Attention is a critical component of perception. However, the mechanisms by which attention modulates neuronal communication to guide behaviour are poorly understood. To elucidate the synaptic mechanisms of attention, we developed a sensitive assay of attentional modulation of neuronal communication. In alert monkeys performing a visual spatial attention task, we probed thalamocortical communication by electrically stimulating neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the thalamus while simultaneously recording shock-evoked responses from monosynaptically connected neurons in primary visual cortex. We found that attention enhances neuronal communication by increasing the efficacy of presynaptic input in driving postsynaptic responses, by increasing synchronous responses among ensembles of postsynaptic neurons receiving independent input, and by decreasing redundant signals between postsynaptic neurons receiving common input. The results demonstrate that attention finely tunes neuronal communication at the synaptic level by selectively altering synaptic weights, enabling enhanced detection of salient events in the noisy sensory environment. Selective attention is a powerful brain mechanism that enables enhanced processing of relevant information while preventing interference from distracting events. Many studies in humans and animals have established that visual attention can influence sensory information processing in visual cortex and subcortical visual areas. Attention directed towards stimuli within the receptive field of a neuron in visual cortex generally results in increases in neuronal firing rate and synchrony. More recent work indicates that visual attention can also alter the correlation structure, variability and/or response gain of neuronal activity. However, the fundamental mechanisms by which visual attention alters communication in neural circuits, at the synaptic level, remain a mystery. Moreover, it is unclear how attention-mediated alterations in neuronal population activity translate into improvements in perception. To elucidate the synaptic mechanisms of attention, we developed a sensitive electrophysiological assay of neuronal communication involving stimulation of thalamocortical neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of the thalamus and simultaneous recordings from monosynaptically connected (that is, postsynaptic) neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) of macaque monkeys performing a spatial attention task. First, we tested whether visual attention alters the efficacy of synaptic communication between the LGN and V1, defined here as the probability that presynaptic stimulation evokes a postsynaptic action potential. Second, we examined whether attention alters both signal and noise in correlated activity among ensembles of postsynaptic target neurons. Two monkeys were trained to maintain central fixation while covertly focusing their attention on one of two drifting gratings in order to report a contrast change in the attended stimulus (Fig. 1). One of the gratings was positioned over the receptive fields of recorded neurons and the other was located at an equivalent eccentricity away from the receptive fields. Trials in which attention was directed towards (attendtowards condition) and away (attend-away condition) from the receptive fields of recorded neurons were organized into blocks and cued by the colour of the central fixation dot. In a random 5% of the trials the cue instruction was invalid, such that the contrast change occurred at the unattended location. Animals were rewarded for correct detection of the contrast change in validly and invalidly cued trials. Behavioural measures of spatial attention were derived by comparisons of accuracy (percentage of trials completed correctly) and reaction times in validly and invalidly cued trials. For both monkeys, accuracy was significantly greater (P , 0.03) and reaction times were significantly faster (P , 0.05; Fig. 1b) for validly versus invalidly cued trials, indicating that animals were covertly attending to the specified location. In each animal, we implanted stimulating electrodes in the magnocellular and parvocellular layers of the LGN (Fig. 2a), so that weak electrical shocks applied to thalamocortical neurons in these layers evoked suprathreshold, shortand fixed-latency monosynaptic spikes in recorded (postsynaptic) thalamocortical-recipient (TCR) neurons, located in layer 4C of V1 (Fig. 2a, b). Importantly, stimulation levels were set so that stimulation evoked a postsynaptic spike in only a fraction of trials (Supplementary Fig. 1a). We recorded visually evoked activity in response to drifting sinusoidal gratings in order to characterize the physiological responses of all recorded TCR neurons. TCR neurons (n 5 61) were grouped into those receiving input from the magnocellular layers and from the parvocellular layers (we refer to these as magnocellular-recipient (n 5 36) and parvocellular-recipient (n 5 25) populations, respectively) based on the stimulus contrast required to evoke a half-maximum response (Fig. 2c). Magnocellularand parvocellular-recipient neurons differed across several physiological
[1]
Daniel Yoshor,et al.
Spatial Attention Does Not Strongly Modulate Neuronal Responses in Early Human Visual Cortex
,
2007,
The Journal of Neuroscience.
[2]
Alexandre Zénon,et al.
Attention deficits without cortical neuronal deficits
,
2012,
Nature.
[3]
H. Spitzer,et al.
Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance.
,
1988,
Science.
[4]
C. Gilbert,et al.
Attention Modulates Contextual Influences in the Primary Visual Cortex of Alert Monkeys
,
1999,
Neuron.
[5]
B. C. Motter.
Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli.
,
1993,
Journal of neurophysiology.
[6]
A. B. Bonds,et al.
Classifying simple and complex cells on the basis of response modulation
,
1991,
Vision Research.
[7]
W. Usrey,et al.
Parallel Processing in the Corticogeniculate Pathway of the Macaque Monkey
,
2009,
Neuron.
[8]
R. Reid,et al.
Synaptic Interactions between Thalamic Inputs to Simple Cells in Cat Visual Cortex
,
2000,
The Journal of Neuroscience.
[9]
John H. R. Maunsell,et al.
Attention to both space and feature modulates neuronal responses in macaque area V4.
,
2000,
Journal of neurophysiology.
[10]
Louise S. Delicato,et al.
Acetylcholine contributes through muscarinic receptors to attentional modulation in V1
,
2008,
Nature.
[11]
M. Pinsk,et al.
Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus
,
2002,
Nature Neuroscience.
[12]
Farran Briggs,et al.
A Fast, Reciprocal Pathway between the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus and Visual Cortex in the Macaque Monkey
,
2007,
The Journal of Neuroscience.
[13]
M. Gazzaniga,et al.
Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans
,
1994,
Nature.
[14]
S. Hillyard,et al.
Visual evoked potentials and selective attention to points in space
,
1977
.
[15]
W. Usrey.
The role of spike timing for thalamocortical processing
,
2002,
Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[16]
Jude F. Mitchell,et al.
Spatial Attention Decorrelates Intrinsic Activity Fluctuations in Macaque Area V4
,
2009,
Neuron.
[17]
C. Brody.
Slow covariations in neuronal resting potentials can lead to artefactually fast cross-correlations in their spike trains.
,
1998,
Journal of neurophysiology.
[18]
R. Desimone,et al.
Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex.
,
1985,
Science.
[19]
Ehud Zohary,et al.
Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance
,
1994,
Nature.
[20]
G A Orban,et al.
Attention-dependent suppression of metabolic activity in the early stages of the macaque visual system.
,
2000,
Cerebral cortex.
[21]
K. Martin,et al.
Excitatory synaptic inputs to spiny stellate cells in cat visual cortex
,
1996,
Nature.
[22]
J Bullier,et al.
Ordinal position and afferent input of neurons in monkey striate cortex
,
1980,
The Journal of comparative neurology.
[23]
Pieter R. Roelfsema,et al.
Additive Effects of Attention and Stimulus Contrast in Primary Visual Cortex
,
2009,
Cerebral cortex.
[24]
M. Hawken,et al.
Gain Modulation by Nicotine in Macaque V1
,
2007,
Neuron.
[25]
G. Karmos,et al.
Entrainment of Neuronal Oscillations as a Mechanism of Attentional Selection
,
2008,
Science.
[26]
R. Reid,et al.
Attention Modulates the Responses of Simple Cells in Monkey Primary Visual Cortex
,
2005,
The Journal of Neuroscience.
[27]
J. Maunsell,et al.
Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations
,
2009,
Nature Neuroscience.
[28]
R. Desimone,et al.
Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex.
,
1997,
Journal of neurophysiology.
[29]
D. Heeger,et al.
Attentional Enhancement via Selection and Pooling of Early Sensory Responses in Human Visual Cortex
,
2011,
Neuron.
[30]
R. Wurtz,et al.
Guarding the gateway to cortex: attention in visual thalamus
,
2008,
Nature.
[31]
John J. Foxe,et al.
Spatial attention modulates initial afferent activity in human primary visual cortex.
,
2008,
Cerebral cortex.
[32]
R. Desimone,et al.
Modulation of Oscillatory Neuronal Synchronization by Selective Visual Attention
,
2001,
Science.