The 'PROCESO' index: a new methodology for the evaluation of operational safety in the chemical industry

Abstract The acknowledgement of industrial installations as complex systems in the early 1980s outstands as a milestone in the path to operational safety. Process plants are social–technical complex systems of a dynamic nature, whose properties depend not only on their components, but also on the inter-relations among them. A comprehensive assessment of operational safety requires a systemic approach, i.e. an integrated framework that includes all the relevant factors influencing safety. Risk analysis methodologies and safety management systems head the list of methods that point in this direction, but they normally require important plant resources. As a consequence, their use is frequently restricted to especially dangerous processes often driven by compliance with legal requirements. In this work a new safety index for the chemical industry, termed the ‘Proceso’ Index (standing for the Spanish terms for PROCedure for the Evaluation of Operational Safety), has been developed. PROCESO is based on the principles of systems theory, has a tree-like structure and considers 25 areas to guide the review of plant safety. The method uses indicators whose respective weight values have been obtained via an expert judgement technique. This paper describes the steps followed to develop this new Operational Safety Index, explains its structure and illustrates its application to process plants.

[1]  J. N. Sørensen,et al.  Safety culture: a survey of the state-of-the-art , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  G. Baumont,et al.  Quantifying human and organizational factors in accident management using decision trees: the HORAAM method , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  George Apostolakis,et al.  The work process analysis model (WPAM) , 1994 .

[4]  Joaquim Casal,et al.  Hazard index for runaway reactions , 1991 .

[5]  Tommy Jansson,et al.  Safety, Health and Environment in Small Process Plants—Results from a European Survey , 2000 .

[6]  J P Doidge,et al.  Successful health and safety management , 1997, Perfusion.

[7]  Trevor Kletz,et al.  The Origins and History of Loss Prevention , 1999 .

[8]  G Zwetsloot,et al.  Encouraging inherently safer production in European firms: a report from the field. , 2000, Journal of hazardous materials.

[9]  Lorraine Pajerek.  Processes and organizations as systems: when the processors are people, not pentiums , 2000 .

[10]  María Rosario Solá Farré.  Actuación humana y riesgo nuclear , 2001 .

[11]  J. N. O'Brien,et al.  Influence of organizational factors on performance reliability , 1991 .

[12]  Linda P. Beckerman.  Application of complex systems science to systems engineering , 2000 .

[13]  Knut Øien.  Risk indicators as a tool for risk control , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Daniela Fogli,et al.  Benchmark exercise on expert judgment techniques in PSA Level 2 , 2001 .

[15]  Ana Sánchez,et al.  The use of maintenance indicators to evaluate the effects of maintenance programs on NPP performance and safety , 1999 .

[16]  M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell,et al.  Human and management factors in probabilistic risk analysis: the SAM approach and observations from recent applications , 1996 .

[17]  Jaime Santos-Reyes,et al.  Assessing safety management systems , 2002 .

[18]  J. S. Duffield,et al.  Seveso II as an instrument for the introduction of formalised safety management systems in small and medium enterprises , 2001 .

[19]  F. Guldenmund.  The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research , 2000 .

[20]  O. Salvi,et al.  Safety Management Systems in application of the Seveso II Directive—Lessons learnt from implementation in SMEs , 2001 .

[21]  Wu Zhongwang.  Operational safety performance indicators for nuclear power plants , 2006 .

[22]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[23]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  A methodology for the prioritization of operating experience in nuclear power plants , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  Knut Øien,et al.  A framework for the establishment of organizational risk indicators , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..