Multi-fidelity design optimization of transonic airfoils using physics-based surrogate modeling and shape-preserving response prediction

Abstract A computationally efficient design methodology for transonic airfoil optimization has been developed. In the optimization process, a numerically cheap physics-based low-fidelity surrogate (the transonic small-disturbance equation) is used in lieu of an accurate, but computationally expensive, high-fidelity (the compressible Euler equations) simulation model. Correction of the low-fidelity model is achieved by aligning its corresponding airfoil surface pressure distribution with that of the high-fidelity model using a shape-preserving response prediction technique. The resulting method requires only a single high-fidelity simulation per iteration of the design process. The method is applied to airfoil lift maximization in two-dimensional inviscid transonic flow, subject to constraints on shock-induced pressure drag and airfoil cross-sectional area. The results showed that more than a 90% reduction in high-fidelity function calls was achieved when compared to direct high-fidelity model optimization using a pattern-search algorithm.

[1]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Surrogate-based Analysis and Optimization , 2005 .

[2]  I. H. Abbott,et al.  Theory of Wing Sections , 1959 .

[3]  Marcus Redhe,et al.  Using space mapping and surrogate models to optimize vehicle crashworthiness design , 2002 .

[4]  Theresa Dawn Robinson,et al.  Surrogate-Based Optimization Using Multifidelity Models with Variable Parameterization and Corrected Space Mapping , 2008 .

[5]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Metamodels for Computer-based Engineering Design: Survey and recommendations , 2001, Engineering with Computers.

[6]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  First-Order Model Management With Variable-Fidelity Physics Applied to Multi-Element Airfoil Optimization , 2000 .

[7]  A. Jameson,et al.  Design Optimization of High-Lift Configurations Using a Viscous Continuous Adjoint Method , 2002 .

[8]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Numerical optimization techniques for engineering design , 1999 .

[9]  Slawomir Koziel Efficient optimization of microwave circuits using shape-preserving response prediction , 2009, 2009 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest.

[10]  S. Koziel,et al.  A Space-Mapping Framework for Engineering Optimization—Theory and Implementation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[11]  S. Koziel,et al.  Space mapping , 2008, IEEE Microwave Magazine.

[12]  A. Jameson,et al.  Control theory based airfoil design for potential flow and a finite volume discretization , 1994 .

[13]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Viscous Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Wings including Planform Variables , 2003 .

[14]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Control theory based airfoil design using the Euler equations , 1994 .

[15]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A tutorial on support vector regression , 2004, Stat. Comput..

[16]  Tang Zhi,et al.  Control theory based airfoil design using Euler equations , 2001 .

[17]  M. J. Rimlinger,et al.  Constrained Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using an Adjoint Formulation and Parallel Computers , 1997 .

[18]  R. M. Hicks,et al.  An assessment of airfoil design by numerical optimization , 1974 .

[19]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic design via control theory , 1988, J. Sci. Comput..

[20]  Bernard Grossman,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization of a strut-braced wing transonic transport , 2000 .

[21]  Goutam Saha,et al.  Hydrodynamic optimization of ship hull forms in shallow water , 2004 .

[22]  Hongwu Zhang,et al.  Study on aerodynamic design optimization of turbomachinery blades , 2005 .

[23]  J.W. Bandler,et al.  Space mapping: the state of the art , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.