A Bayesian Random Effects Discrete-Choice Model for Resource Selection: Population-Level Selection Inference

Abstract Modeling the probability of use of land units characterized by discrete and continuous measures, we present a Bayesian random-effects model to assess resource selection. This model provides simultaneous estimation of both individual- and population-level selection. Deviance information criterion (DIC), a Bayesian alternative to AIC that is sample-size specific, is used for model selection. Aerial radiolocation data from 76 adult female caribou (Rangifer tarandus) and calf pairs during 1 year on an Arctic coastal plain calving ground were used to illustrate models and assess population-level selection of landscape attributes, as well as individual heterogeneity of selection. Landscape attributes included elevation, NDVI (a measure of forage greenness), and land cover-type classification. Results from the first of a 2-stage model-selection procedure indicated that there is substantial heterogeneity among cow–calf pairs with respect to selection of the landscape attributes. In the second stage, selection of models with heterogeneity included indicated that at the population-level, NDVI and land cover class were significant attributes for selection of different landscapes by pairs on the calving ground. Population-level selection coefficients indicate that the pairs generally select landscapes with higher levels of NDVI, but the relationship is quadratic. The highest rate of selection occurs at values of NDVI less than the maximum observed. Results for land cover-class selections coefficients indicate that wet sedge, moist sedge, herbaceous tussock tundra, and shrub tussock tundra are selected at approximately the same rate, while alpine and sparsely vegetated landscapes are selected at a lower rate. Furthermore, the variability in selection by individual caribou for moist sedge and sparsely vegetated landscapes is large relative to the variability in selection of other land cover types. The example analysis illustrates that, while sometimes computationally intense, a Bayesian hierarchical discrete-choice model for resource selection can provide managers with 2 components of population-level inference: average population selection and variability of selection. Both components are necessary to make sound management decisions based on animal selection.

[1]  Patrick D. Gerard,et al.  Habitat selection models for eastern wild turkeys in central Mississippi. , 2000 .

[2]  Joshua J. Millspaugh,et al.  Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates , 1999 .

[3]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[4]  F. Ramsey,et al.  Habitat selection models to account for seasonal persistence in radio telemetry data , 2007, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[5]  DANA L. THOMAS,et al.  Study Designs and Tests for Comparing Resource Use and Availability II , 2006 .

[6]  Walter R. Gilks,et al.  A Language and Program for Complex Bayesian Modelling , 1994 .

[7]  Nicholas J. Aebischer,et al.  Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use From Animal Radio-Tracking Data , 1993 .

[8]  S P Brooks,et al.  On the Bayesian Analysis of Ring‐Recovery Data , 2000, Biometrics.

[9]  Joseph G. Ibrahim,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods in Bayesian Computation , 2000 .

[10]  Hammou El Barmi,et al.  Testing ordered hypotheses in animal resource selection studies , 2000 .

[11]  Kenneth P. Burnham,et al.  Evaluation of some random effects methodology applicable to bird ringing data , 2002 .

[12]  B. Manly,et al.  Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. , 1994 .

[13]  Aki Vehtari Discussion to "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit" by Spiegelhalter, D.J., Best, N.G., Carlin, B.P., and van der Linde, A. , 2002 .

[14]  R. Powell,et al.  KERNELHR: A program for estimating animal home ranges , 1998 .

[15]  N. Dasgupta,et al.  A Chi‐square Goodness‐of‐Fit Analysis of Dependent Resource election Data , 2000, Biometrics.

[16]  C. J. Tucker,et al.  Relationship between atmospheric CO2 variations and a satellite-derived vegetation index , 1986, Nature.

[17]  R. Powell,et al.  An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Kernel Density Estimators for Home Range Analysis , 1996 .

[18]  ELIZABETH M. GLENN,et al.  SPOTTED OWL HOME-RANGE AND HABITAT USE IN YOUNG FORESTS OF WESTERN OREGON , 2004 .

[19]  Jennifer A Hoeting,et al.  Autoregressive Models for Capture‐Recapture Data: A Bayesian Approach , 2003, Biometrics.

[20]  Fred L Ramsey,et al.  Persistence and heterogeneity in habitat selection studies using radio telemetry. , 2003, Biometrics.

[21]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[22]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[23]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  The Use of Discrete-Choice Models for Evaluating Resource Selection , 1998 .

[24]  C. Tucker Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation , 1979 .

[25]  Joshua J. Millspaugh,et al.  THE APPLICATION OF DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS TO WILDLIFE RESOURCE SELECTION STUDIES , 1999 .

[26]  Robert G. White,et al.  The porcupine caribou herd , 2002 .

[27]  Nairanjana Dasgupta,et al.  A Multivariate χ 2 Analysis of Resource Selection Data , 1998 .

[28]  John Geweke,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments , 1991 .

[29]  J. Nichols,et al.  OF BUGS AND BIRDS: MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO FOR HIERARCHICAL MODELING IN WILDLIFE RESEARCH , 2002 .

[30]  Jerry Nedelman,et al.  Book review: “Bayesian Data Analysis,” Second Edition by A. Gelman, J.B. Carlin, H.S. Stern, and D.B. Rubin Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2004 , 2005, Comput. Stat..

[31]  Christopher K. Wikle,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian Models for Predicting The Spread of Ecological Processes , 2003 .

[32]  J. R. Alldredge,et al.  Comparison of some statistical techniques for analysis of resource selection , 1986 .

[33]  Ronald P. Barry,et al.  A Bayesian multinomial model for analyzing categorical habitat selection data , 2004 .

[34]  John Aitchison,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data , 1986 .

[35]  M. Boyce Statistics as viewed by biologists , 2002 .

[36]  Nairanjana Dasgupta,et al.  A single-step method for identifying individual resources , 2002 .

[37]  Gary C. White,et al.  Analysis of Wildlife Radio-Tracking Data , 1990 .

[38]  Charles F. Manski,et al.  Alternative Estimators and Sample Designs for Discrete Choice Analysis , 1981 .