Effectiveness and policies analysis of pool testing method for COVID-19

PurposeThis research aims to figure out whether the pool testing method of SARS-CoV-2 for COVID-19 is effective and the optimal sample size is in one bunch. Additionally, since the infection rate was unknown at the beginning, this research aims to propose a multiple sampling approach that enables the pool testing method to be utilized successfully.Design/methodology/approachThe authors verify that the pool testing method of SARS-CoV-2 for COVID-19 is effective under the situation of the shortage of nucleic acid detection kits based on probabilistic modeling. In this method, the testing is performed on several samples of the cases together as a bunch. If the test result of the bunch is negative, then it is shown that none of the cases in the bunch has been infected with the novel coronavirus. On the contrary, if the test result of the bunch is positive, then the samples are tested one by one to confirm which cases are infected.FindingsIf the infection rate is extremely low, while the same number of detection kits is used, the expected number of cases that can be tested by the pool testing method is far more than that by the one-by-one testing method. The pool testing method is effective only when the infection rate is less than 0.3078. The higher the infection rate, the smaller the optimal sample size in one bunch. If N samples are tested by the pool testing method, while the sample size in one bunch is G, the number of detection kits required is in the interval (N/G, N).Originality/valueThis research proves that the pool testing method is not only suitable for the situation of the shortage of detection kits but also the situation of the overall or sampling detection for a large population. More importantly, it calculates the optimal sample size in one bunch corresponding to different infection rates. Additionally, a multiple sampling approach is proposed. In this approach, the whole testing process is divided into several rounds in which the sample sizes in one bunch are different. The actual infection rate is estimated gradually precisely by sampling inspection in each round.

[1]  R. Pandey,et al.  National sero-surveillance to monitor the trend of SARS-CoV-2 infection transmission in India: Protocol for community-based surveillance , 2020, The Indian journal of medical research.

[2]  B. Singer,et al.  Impact of international travel and border control measures on the global spread of the novel 2019 coronavirus outbreak , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  M. Loeffelholz,et al.  Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of serology tests for COVID-19: impact of assay design and post-symptom-onset intervals , 2020, Emerging microbes & infections.

[4]  Yandre M. G. Costa,et al.  COVID-19 identification in chest X-ray images on flat and hierarchical classification scenarios , 2020, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine.

[5]  David Cyranoski,et al.  What China’s coronavirus response can teach the rest of the world , 2020, Nature.

[6]  C. Thompson,et al.  Diagnostic Characteristics of Serological-Based COVID-19 Testing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2020, Clinics.

[7]  M. Bachmann,et al.  Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China , 2020, Nature Communications.

[8]  Alimuddin Zumla,et al.  Passengers' destinations from China: low risk of Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) transmission into Africa and South America , 2020, Epidemiology and Infection.

[9]  A. Sunjaya,et al.  Pooled Testing for Expanding COVID-19 Mass Surveillance , 2020, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.

[10]  Sanyi Tang,et al.  Effects of media reporting on mitigating spread of COVID-19 in the early phase of the outbreak. , 2020, Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE.

[11]  Chayu Yang,et al.  A mathematical model for the novel coronavirus epidemic in Wuhan, China , 2020, Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE.

[12]  Mauricio Olivares,et al.  Optimizing RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 for developing countries using pool testing , 2020, medRxiv.

[13]  P. Klepac,et al.  Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts , 2020, The Lancet Global Health.

[14]  H. Kirking,et al.  First known person-to-person transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the USA , 2020, The Lancet.

[15]  E. Theel,et al.  Performance Characteristics of Four High-Throughput Immunoassays for Detection of IgG Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[16]  Diego A. Huyke,et al.  Electric field-driven microfluidics for rapid CRISPR-based diagnostics and its application to detection of SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Maged N. Kamel Boulos,et al.  Geographical tracking and mapping of coronavirus disease COVID-19/severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic and associated events around the world: how 21st century GIS technologies are supporting the global fight against outbreaks and epidemics , 2020, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[18]  Jian-ming Wang,et al.  Clinical characteristics of 24 asymptomatic infections with COVID-19 screened among close contacts in Nanjing, China , 2020, Science China Life Sciences.

[19]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  The scientific literature on Coronaviruses, COVID-19 and its associated safety-related research dimensions: A scientometric analysis and scoping review , 2020, Safety Science.

[20]  M. Maejima,et al.  Pooling RT-qPCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 in 1000 individuals of healthy and infection-suspected patients , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[21]  S. Duong,et al.  Analytical and Clinical Comparison of Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Detection , 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[22]  Fu Lian Yin,et al.  COVID-19 information propagation dynamics in the Chinese Sina-microblog. , 2020, Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE.