Probabilistic Fatigue Life Prediction and Structural Reliability Evaluation of Turbine Rotors Integrating an Automated Ultrasonic Inspection System

The paper presents a general method and procedure for fatigue reliability assessment integrating automated ultrasonic non-destructive inspections. The basic structure of an automated ultrasonic inspection system is presented. Fatigue reliability assessment methodology is developed using uncertainty quantification models for detection, sizing, and fatigue model parameters. The probability of detection model is based on a classical log-linear model coupling the actual flaw size with the ultrasonic inspection reported size. Using probabilistic modeling, the distribution of the actual flaw size is derived. Reliability assessment procedure using ultrasonic inspection data is suggested. A steam turbine rotor example with realistic ultrasonic inspection data is presented to demonstrate the overall method. Calculations and interpretations of assessment results based on risk recommendations for industrial applications are given.

[1]  J. Norton.  Ignorance and Indifference* , 2008, Philosophy of Science.

[2]  K. Maile,et al.  Evaluation of NDT-signals for use in the fracture mechanics safety analysis , 1998 .

[3]  Aie.  World Energy Outlook 2011 , 2001 .

[4]  D. V. Leemans,et al.  Bayesian approaches to using field test data in determining the probability of detection , 2004 .

[5]  Rolf Adams,et al.  Seeded Region Growing , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  Bogdan J. Matuszewski,et al.  CAD model-based inspection and visualisation for 3D non-destructive testing of complex aerostructures , 2004 .

[7]  A. P. Berens,et al.  Risk Analysis for Aging Aircraft Fleets , 1991 .

[8]  J Rudlin,et al.  Review of statistical methods used in quantifying NDT reliability , 2004 .

[9]  Peter Cawley,et al.  A review of non-destructive techniques for the detection of creep damage in power plant steels , 2010 .

[10]  P. Gregory.  Bayesian Logical Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences: A Comparative Approach with Mathematica® Support , 2005 .

[11]  P. Wilcox,et al.  AIP Conference Proceedings , 2012 .

[12]  Ramaswamy Viswanathan,et al.  Life assessment and improvement of turbo-generator rotors for fossil plants , 1985 .

[13]  K. Simola,et al.  Models for non-destructive inspection data , 1998 .

[14]  J. Krautkrämer,et al.  Determination of the size of defects by the ultrasonic impulse echo method , 1959 .

[15]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Role of non-destructive evaluation in time-dependent reliability analysis , 1998 .

[16]  Alfred M. Freudenthal,et al.  The scatter factor in the reliability assessment of aircraft structures , 1977 .

[17]  Ic Moore,et al.  Probabilistic Updating of Flaw Information , 1973 .

[18]  Xuefei Guan,et al.  Model selection, updating, and averaging for probabilistic fatigue damage prognosis , 2011 .

[19]  Dirk P. Kroese,et al.  Simulation and the Monte Carlo method , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[20]  Simon A Neild,et al.  16th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing , 2003 .

[21]  William Q. Meeker,et al.  Joint Estimation of NDE Inspection Capability and Flaw-Size Distribution for In-Service Aircraft Inspections , 2012 .

[22]  Philip C. Gregory,et al.  Bayesian Logical Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences: Acknowledgements , 2005 .

[23]  A. P. Berens,et al.  Risk Analysis for Aging Aircraft Fleets. Volume 1: Analysis , 1991 .

[24]  Jan Drewes Achenbach,et al.  Quantitative nondestructive evaluation , 2000 .

[25]  William Q. Meeker,et al.  Joint estimation of the flaw size distribution and pod function , 2009 .

[26]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Reliability evaluation of engineering systems : concepts and techniques , 1992 .