Nature to Independent 'Object/s' The Mutability of Biotechnology Patents: From Unwieldy Products of
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] B. Joerges. Do Politics Have Artefacts? , 1999 .
[2] Marianne de Laet,et al. The Zimbabwe Bush Pump , 2000 .
[3] A. Mol. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice , 2003 .
[4] T. Kuhn,et al. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .
[5] Nick Lee,et al. Otherness and the Actor Network , 1994 .
[6] R. Nozick,et al. Anarchy, State, and Utopia , 1978 .
[7] Sheila Jasanoff,et al. Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science , 2003 .
[8] L. Winner. The Whale and the Reactor , 2020 .
[9] John Law,et al. Globalisation in practice: On the politics of boiling pigswill , 2008 .
[10] John Law,et al. Objects and Spaces , 2002 .
[11] Rachel Schurman,et al. Fighting “Frankenfoods”: Industry Opportunity Structures and the Efficacy of the Anti-Biotech Movement in Western Europe , 2004 .
[12] B. Latour. We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .
[13] Marc Berg,et al. Differences in Medicine: Unraveling Practices, Techniques, and Bodies , 1999 .
[14] M. Biagioli. Patent Republic: Representing Inventions, Constructing Rights and Authors , 2006 .
[15] G. Zweiger. Transducing the Genome: Information, Anarchy, and Revolution in the Biomedical Sciences , 2001 .
[16] D. Kevles. A history of patenting life in the United States with comparative attention to Europe and Canada: a report to the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies , 2002 .
[17] M. Carolan. From patent law to regulation: the ontological gerrymandering of biotechnology , 2008 .
[18] M. Mulkay. Norms and ideology in science , 1976 .
[19] Rebecca S. Eisenberg,et al. How Can You Patent Genes? , 2002, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.
[20] S. Prudham. The Fictions of Autonomous Invention: Accumulation by Dispossession, Commodification and Life Patents in Canada , 2007 .
[21] F. Buttel. The Environmental and Post-Environmental Politics of Genetically Modified Crops and Foods , 2005 .
[22] Lori B. Andrews,et al. Genes and patent policy: rethinking intellectual property rights , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[23] Steve Woolgar,et al. Do Artefacts Have Ambivalence , 1999 .
[24] Brian Wynne,et al. Reflexing Complexity , 2005 .
[25] K. Bakker. The “Commons” Versus the “Commodity”: Alter‐globalization, Anti‐privatization and the Human Right to Water in the Global South , 2007 .
[26] S. Jasanoff. Contested Boundaries in Policy-Relevant Science , 1987 .
[27] Opposite Thermodynamic Arrows of Time , 1999, cond-mat/9911101.
[28] T. Gieryn. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional , 1983 .
[29] R. Eisenberg,et al. Re-examining the role of patents in appropriating the value of DNA sequences. , 2000, Emory law journal.
[30] S. Benowitz. French challenge to BRCA1 patent underlies European discontent. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[31] Rebecca S. Eisenberg,et al. Patents and data-sharing in public science , 2006 .
[32] M. Strathern. Cutting the Network , 1996 .
[33] M. Walzer. I. Liberalism and the Art of Separation , 1984 .
[34] J J Doll,et al. The Patenting of DNA , 1998, Science.