Mutation rate analysis via parent–progeny sequencing of the perennial peach. I. A low rate in woody perennials and a higher mutagenicity in hybrids

Mutation rates vary between species, between strains within species and between regions within a genome. What are the determinants of these forms of variation? Here, via parent–offspring sequencing of the peach we ask whether (i) woody perennials tend to have lower per unit time mutation rates compared to annuals, and (ii) hybrid strains have high mutation rates. Between a leaf from a low heterozygosity individual, derived from an intraspecific cross, to a leaf of its selfed progeny, the mutation rate is 7.77 × 10−9 point mutations per bp per generation, similar to Arabidopsis thaliana (7.0–7.4 × 10−9 point mutations per bp per generation). This suggests a low per unit time mutation rate as the generation time is much longer in peach. This is supported by our estimate of 9.48 × 10−9 point mutations per bp per generation from a 200-year-old low heterozygosity peach to its progeny. From a more highly heterozygous individual derived from an interspecific cross to its selfed progeny, the mutation rate is 1.38 × 10−8 mutations per site per generation, consistent with raised rates in hybrids. Our data thus suggest that (i) peach has an approximately order of magnitude lower mutation rate per unit time than Arabidopsis, consistent with reports of low evolutionary rates in woody perennials, and (ii) hybridization may, indeed, be associated with increased mutation rates as considered over a century ago.

[1]  J. Dvorak,et al.  Synteny analysis in Rosids with a walnut physical map reveals slow genome evolution in long-lived woody perennials , 2015, BMC Genomics.

[2]  L. Hurst,et al.  Parent–progeny sequencing indicates higher mutation rates in heterozygotes , 2015, Nature.

[3]  L. Hurst,et al.  Why Selection Might Be Stronger When Populations Are Small: Intron Size and Density Predict within and between-Species Usage of Exonic Splice Associated cis-Motifs , 2015, Molecular biology and evolution.

[4]  Kateryna D. Makova,et al.  The effects of chromatin organization on variation in mutation rates in the genome , 2015, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[5]  N. Colegrave,et al.  Extensive de novo mutation rate variation between individuals and across the genome of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii , 2015, bioRxiv.

[6]  Yeisoo Yu,et al.  Uncovering the novel characteristics of Asian honey bee, Apis cerana, by whole genome sequencing , 2015, BMC Genomics.

[7]  P. Keightley,et al.  Estimation of the Spontaneous Mutation Rate in Heliconius melpomene , 2014, Molecular biology and evolution.

[8]  S. Tishkoff,et al.  Biased gene conversion skews allele frequencies in human populations, increasing the disease burden of recessive alleles. , 2014, American journal of human genetics.

[9]  U. Grossniklaus,et al.  Hybridization Alters Spontaneous Mutation Rates in a Parent-of-Origin-Dependent Fashion in Arabidopsis1[W] , 2014, Plant Physiology.

[10]  T. Gradziel,et al.  Heterogeneity in the entire genome for three genotypes of peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] as distinguished from sequence analysis of genomic variants , 2013, BMC Genomics.

[11]  Daniel R. Schrider,et al.  Rates and Genomic Consequences of Spontaneous Mutational Events in Drosophila melanogaster , 2013, Genetics.

[12]  W. Amos Variation in Heterozygosity Predicts Variation in Human Substitution Rates between Populations, Individuals and Genomic Regions , 2013, PloS one.

[13]  Christina E. Wells,et al.  The high-quality draft genome of peach (Prunus persica) identifies unique patterns of genetic diversity, domestication and genome evolution , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[14]  Heng Li Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM , 2013, 1303.3997.

[15]  Helga Thorvaldsdóttir,et al.  Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration , 2012, Briefings Bioinform..

[16]  Christopher A. Miller,et al.  VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. , 2012, Genome research.

[17]  Alan Hodgkinson,et al.  Variation in the mutation rate across mammalian genomes , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[18]  M. DePristo,et al.  A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[19]  Dan Wang,et al.  Genome-wide investigation reveals high evolutionary rates in annual model plants , 2010, BMC Plant Biology.

[20]  P. Arús,et al.  Genetic variation, population structure and linkage disequilibrium in peach commercial varieties , 2010, BMC Genetics.

[21]  William Amos,et al.  Even small SNP clusters are non-randomly distributed: is this evidence of mutational non-independence? , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Richard M. Clark,et al.  The Rate and Molecular Spectrum of Spontaneous Mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2010, Science.

[23]  W. Amos Heterozygosity and mutation rate: evidence for an interaction and its implications , 2010, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[24]  Laurent Duret,et al.  Biased gene conversion and the evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes. , 2009, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[25]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Rates of Molecular Evolution Are Linked to Life History in Flowering Plants , 2008, Science.

[26]  Daniele Bassi,et al.  The Peach: Botany, Production and Uses , 2008 .

[27]  Laurent Duret,et al.  The Impact of Recombination on Nucleotide Substitutions in the Human Genome , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[28]  C. Baer,et al.  Does Mutation Rate Depend on Itself? , 2008, PLoS biology.

[29]  Rodrigo Lopez,et al.  Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0 , 2007, Bioinform..

[30]  L. Hurst,et al.  Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[31]  M. Lynch,et al.  Comparative evolutionary genetics of spontaneous mutations affecting fitness in rhabditid nematodes. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  C. Ticconi,et al.  Isolation and characterization of a maintenance DNA-methyltransferase gene from peach (Prunus persica [L.] Batsch): transcript localization in vegetative and reproductive meristems of triple buds. , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.

[33]  Martin J Lercher,et al.  Human SNP variability and mutation rate are higher in regions of high recombination. , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[34]  Martin J Lercher,et al.  Regional similarities in polymorphism in the human genome extend over many megabases. , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[35]  U. Grossniklaus,et al.  The art and design of genetic screens: Arabidopsis thaliana , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[36]  N. Barton,et al.  SELECTION FOR RECOMBINATION IN SMALL POPULATIONS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  J. Relethford Mutation rate and excess African heterozygosity. , 1997, Human biology.

[38]  G. Bell,et al.  Mammalian chiasma frequencies as a test of two theories of recombination , 1987, Nature.

[39]  W. F. Thompson,et al.  Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. , 1980, Nucleic acids research.

[40]  N. Johnson,et al.  High mutability in male hybrids of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1980, Genetics.

[41]  J. N. Thompson,et al.  Increased mutation in crosses between geographically separated strains of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  R. F. Lyman,et al.  Intraspecific hybridisation and the release of mutator activity , 1979, Nature.

[43]  R. C. Woodruff,et al.  Mutator genes—pacemakers of evolution , 1978, Nature.

[44]  P. Dale,et al.  Chiasmata and variability in Lolium and Festuca populations , 1974, Chromosoma.

[45]  G. Magni ORIGIN AND NATURE OF SPONTANEOUS MUTATIONS IN MEIOTIC ORGANISMS. , 1964, Journal of cellular and comparative physiology.

[46]  R. V. von Borstel,et al.  Different Rates of Spontaneous Mutation during Mitosis and Meiosis in Yeast. , 1962, Genetics.

[47]  A. Sturtevant High Mutation Frequency Induced by Hybridization. , 1939, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  M. L. Belgovsky A comparison of the frequency of induced mutations in drosophila simulans and in its hybrid with D. Melanogaster , 1937, Genetica.

[49]  M. Demerec Rate of Instability of Miniature-3 Gamma Gene of Drosophila Virilis in the Males in the Homozygous and in the Heterozygous Females. , 1932, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  M. Demerec CHANGES IN THE RATE OF MUTABILITY OF THE MUTABLE MINIATURE GENE OF DROSOPHILA VIRILIS. , 1929, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  R. Emerson The Frequency of Somatic Mutation in Variegated Pericarp of Maize. , 1929, Genetics.

[52]  F. Duncan An Attempt to Produce Mutations Through Hybridization , 1915, The American Naturalist.

[53]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[54]  Alex Gildzen The Year Book , 1975 .