Membership function sensitivity of descriptive statistics in fuzzy-set relations

Fuzzy-set theory has provided researchers with a new perspective on many social-scientific problems. In particular, the method of fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) has gained in popularity across various disciplines. However, while the methodological development of fsQCA has progressed on a number of fronts, sensitivity diagnostics have only recently been put on the agenda. This article analyses how coverage as an important descriptive statistic in fsQCA is influenced by the interaction between membership function form and crossover threshold choice. Depending on the relative location of the latter, changes in the former influence coverage in either a negative or a positive direction, and to different magnitudes. This influence is not uniform but varies in relation to cases’ distance from unique peak points. Although the orientation of this article is theoretical, its results have implications for empirical research. Most importantly, the influence of membership functions should become part of routine sensitivity checks.

[1]  Adrian Duşa,et al.  QCA: A Package for Qualitative Comparative Analysis , 2013, R J..

[2]  M. Vink,et al.  Potentials and Pitfalls of Multi-value QCA , 2013 .

[3]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[4]  Alrik Thiem,et al.  Clearly Crisp, and Not Fuzzy , 2013 .

[5]  Kyle C. Longest,et al.  Fuzzy: A Program for Performing Qualitative Comparative Analyses (QCA) in Stata , 2008, The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata.

[6]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: Potential pitfalls and suggestions for solutions , 2012 .

[7]  Sandra Lowe,et al.  Redesigning Social Inquiry Fuzzy Sets And Beyond , 2016 .

[8]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: Contents , 2012 .

[9]  J. Walkup Fuzzy-set social science , 2003 .

[10]  Terry D. Clark,et al.  Applying Fuzzy Mathematics to Formal Models in Comparative Politics , 2008, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.

[11]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets , 2010 .

[12]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Logic for Business, Finance, and Management , 1997, Advances in Fuzzy Systems - Applications and Theory.

[13]  Jon Kvist,et al.  Diversity, Ideal Types and Fuzzy Sets in Comparative Welfare State Research , 2006 .

[14]  T. Risse,et al.  "Constructing Europe? The Evolution of French, British, and German Nation-State Identities" , 1999 .

[15]  M. Vink,et al.  Not quite crisp, not yet fuzzy? Assessing the potentials and pitfalls of multi-value QCA 1 , 2007 .

[16]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using Fuzzy Sets (fsQCA) , 2008 .

[17]  Gary Goertz,et al.  Assessing the Trivialness, Relevance, and Relative Importance of Necessary or Sufficient Conditions in Social Science , 2006 .

[18]  Scott R. Eliason,et al.  Goodness-of-Fit Tests and Descriptive Measures in Fuzzy-Set Analysis , 2009 .

[19]  N. Singpurwalla,et al.  Membership Functions and Probability Measures of Fuzzy Sets , 2004 .

[20]  Jay Verkuilen,et al.  Assigning Membership in a Fuzzy Set Analysis , 2005 .

[21]  Steven Samford,et al.  Averting “Disruption and Reversal”: Reassessing the Logic of Rapid Trade Reform in Latin America , 2010 .

[22]  Adrian Duşa,et al.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis with R: A User's Guide , 2012 .

[23]  T. Banchoff German Identity and European Integration , 1999 .

[24]  H. Trussell,et al.  Constructing membership functions using statistical data , 1986 .

[25]  Ute St. Clair,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory: Foundations and Applications , 1997 .

[26]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis , 2012 .

[27]  Mathias Koenig-Archibugi,et al.  Explaining Government Preferences for Institutional Change in EU Foreign and Security Policy , 2004, International Organization.

[28]  Judith Glaesser,et al.  Paradoxes and Pitfalls in Using Fuzzy Set QCA: Illustrations from a Critical Review of a Study of Educational Inequality , 2011 .

[29]  Barbara Vis,et al.  The Comparative Advantages of fsQCA and Regression Analysis for Moderately Large-N Analyses , 2012 .

[30]  George Bojadziev,et al.  Fuzzy Logic for Business, Finance, and Management - 2nd Edition , 2007, Advances in Fuzzy Systems - Applications and Theory.

[31]  Dirk Berg-Schlosser,et al.  Multi-Value QCA (mvQCA) , 2009 .

[32]  M. Smithson Fuzzy Set Inclusion , 2005 .

[33]  Svend-Erik Skaaning,et al.  Assessing the Robustness of Crisp-set and Fuzzy-set QCA Results , 2011 .

[34]  R. Gott,et al.  The Roles of Substantive and Procedural Understanding in Open-Ended Science Investigations: Using Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to Compare Two Different Tasks , 2009 .

[35]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage , 2006, Political Analysis.

[36]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Fuzzy Sets and Social Research , 2005 .

[37]  Barry Cooper,et al.  Using case‐based approaches to analyse large datasets: a comparison of Ragin’s fsQCA and fuzzy cluster analysis , 2011 .