The role of spatiotemporal edges in visibility and visual masking.

What parts of a visual stimulus produce the greatest neural signal? Previous studies have explored this question and found that the onset of a stimulus's edge is what excites early visual neurons most strongly. The role of inhibition at the edges of stimuli has remained less clear, however, and the importance of neural responses associated with the termination of stimuli has only recently been examined. Understanding all of these spatiotemporal parameters (the excitation and inhibition evoked by the stimulus's onset and termination, as well as its spatial edges) is crucial if we are to develop a general principle concerning the relationship between neural signals and the parts of the stimulus that generate them. Here, we use visual masking illusions to explore this issue, in combination with human psychophysics, awake behaving primate neurophysiology in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the thalamus, and optical recording in the primary visual cortex of anesthetized monkeys. The edges of the stimulus, rather than its interior, generate the strongest excitatory and inhibitory responses both perceptually and physiologically. These edges can be imaged directly by using optical recording techniques. Excitation and inhibition are moreover most powerful when the stimulus turns both on and off (what might be thought of as the stimulus's temporal edges). We thus conclude that there is a general principle that relates the generation of neural signals (excitatory and inhibitory) to the spatiotemporal edges of stimuli in the early visual system.

[1]  D H Hubel,et al.  Visual responses in V1 of freely viewing monkeys. , 1996, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[2]  J. Lisman Bursts as a unit of neural information: making unreliable synapses reliable , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  K Nakayama,et al.  Local adaptation in cat LGN cells: evidence for a surround antagonism. , 1971, Vision research.

[4]  M. Livingstone,et al.  Neuronal correlates of visibility and invisibility in the primate visual system , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  P K Ahnelt,et al.  The photoreceptor mosaic , 1998, Eye.

[6]  E. D. Adrian,et al.  The action of light on the eye , 1927 .

[7]  A. Stoper,et al.  Metacontrast and paracontrast suppression of a contourless area , 1978, Vision Research.

[8]  D. Hubel,et al.  Uniformity of monkey striate cortex: A parallel relationship between field size, scatter, and magnification factor , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Long-range horizontal connections and their role in cortical reorganization revealed by optical recording of cat primary visual cortex , 1995, Nature.

[10]  W A RUSHTON,et al.  The effect upon the rod threshold of bleaching neighbouring rods , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  R. Christopher deCharms,et al.  Primary cortical representation of sounds by the coordination of action-potential timing , 1996, Nature.

[12]  I H WAGMAN,et al.  Neural limitations of visual excitability. IV. Spatial determinants of retrochiasmal interaction. , 1962, The American journal of physiology.

[13]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Functional architecture of cortex revealed by optical imaging of intrinsic signals , 1986, Nature.

[14]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  Edward C. Day PHOTOELECTRIC CURRENTS IN THE EYE OF THE FISH , 1915 .

[16]  S L Macknik,et al.  Optical images of visible and invisible percepts in the primary visual cortex of primates. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  H. K. Hartline,et al.  THE RESPONSES OF LIMULUS OPTIC NERVE FIBERS TO PATTERNS OF ILLUMINATION ON THE RECEPTOR MOSAIC , 1959, The Journal of general physiology.

[18]  Ernst Mach The Analysis of the Sensations: Antimetaphysical , 1890 .

[19]  B. H. Crawford Visual adaptation in relation to brief conditioning stimuli , 1947, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[20]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Visual attention modulates metacontrast masking , 1995, Nature.

[21]  R. W. DITCHBURN,et al.  Vision with a Stabilized Retinal Image , 1952, Nature.

[22]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Brightness perception and filling-in , 1991, Vision Research.

[23]  D Purves,et al.  The extraordinarily rapid disappearance of entoptic images. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Substitution: A New Form of Masking in Unattended Visual Locations , 1997 .

[25]  D. Jameson,et al.  Mach bands : quantitative studies on neural networks in the retina , 1966 .

[26]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  A systematic map of direction preference in primary visual cortex , 1996, Nature.

[27]  B. Boycott,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell density and cortical magnification factor in the primate , 1990, Vision Research.

[28]  M. Livingstone,et al.  Mechanisms of Direction Selectivity in Macaque V1 , 1998, Neuron.

[29]  G. Blasdel,et al.  Differential imaging of ocular dominance and orientation selectivity in monkey striate cortex , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  G. Blasdel,et al.  Voltage-sensitive dyes reveal a modular organization in monkey striate cortex , 1986, Nature.

[31]  D. Purves,et al.  The effects of color on brightness , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  G Westheimer,et al.  Spatial interaction in the human retina during scotopic vision. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  H. Werner Studies on Contour: I. Qualitative Analyses , 1935 .

[34]  D. Hubel,et al.  Sequence regularity and geometry of orientation columns in the monkey striate cortex , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[35]  D. Hubel,et al.  Microsaccadic eye movements and firing of single cells in the striate cortex of macaque monkeys , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  G. Blasdel,et al.  Orientation selectivity, preference, and continuity in monkey striate cortex , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  M. Paradiso,et al.  Filling-in Percepts Produced by Luminance Modulation , 1996, Vision Research.

[38]  D H Hubel,et al.  Effects of varying stimulus size and color on single lateral geniculate cells in Rhesus monkeys. , 1966, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Jay Enoch,et al.  Mach Bands: Quantitative Studies on Neural Networks in the Retina , 1966 .

[40]  D. Hubel,et al.  Spatial and chromatic interactions in the lateral geniculate body of the rhesus monkey. , 1966, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  B. H. Crawford The effect of field size and pattern on the change of visual sensitivity with time , 1940, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[42]  Peter De Weerd,et al.  Responses of cells in monkey visual cortex during perceptual filling-in of an artificial scotoma , 1995, Nature.

[43]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.