Flexible optimization decision for product design agility with embedded real options

One of the evolving trends in today’s marketplace is that consumers are demanding ever more innovative goods that are tailored to their specific needs. This requires that companies need to create products that either can be rapidly evolved or can be customized to meet specified personal requirements. On the other hand, the scale of economy brought by mass production is also desired. An approach called mass customization (MC) has been proposed to solve these two conflicting criteria. An important way to achieve MC is through modular product design and shared product platform development. In this paper, a flexible modular product design optimization decision model is proposed. To address the different attributes of customers’ demands, the optimization model is decomposed into profit, cost, value, and demand sub-models. In order to be adaptive to the changes in customer requirements two levels of flexibility are endowed within the model. The first level of flexibility consists in embedded options. Small adjustments to a product can be made using these options. When the customer demands a radical change to a product or there are several concurrent small changes that need to be made then the product design model needs an optimization decision route to guide the reconfiguration. This is the second level of flexibility that indicates an evolution within the scope of the overall structure of the product design. The flexible decision-making procedures are iterative in order to make the product design to evolve from one generation to another. A notebook computer example is used to illustrate the proposed concepts. Numerical experiments on mobile phone designs are used to verify the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

[1]  H. E. Cook,et al.  On the valuation of goods and selection of the best design alternative , 2001 .

[2]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Multi-attribute utility analysis in set-based conceptual design , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..

[3]  Jörn Mehnen,et al.  Evolutionary multi-objective design optimisation with real life uncertainty and constraints , 2009 .

[4]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Generalized models of design iteration using signal flow graphs , 1995 .

[5]  Yong Zeng,et al.  A science-based approach to product design theory Part I: formulation and formalization of design process , 1999 .

[6]  Janis Terpenny,et al.  Design for adaptability (DFAD)-a new concept for achieving sustainable design , 2007 .

[7]  Eun Suk Suh,et al.  Design for Flexibility: Performance and Economic Optimization of Product Platform Components , 2004 .

[8]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development , 1994 .

[9]  Andrew Olewnik,et al.  A decision support framework for flexible system design , 2006 .

[10]  Ali A. Yassine,et al.  Optimal platform investment for product family design , 2008, J. Intell. Manuf..

[11]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  A Theory of Complexity, Periodicity and the Design Axioms , 1999 .

[12]  Beebe Nelson,et al.  Flexible Product Development: Building Agility for Changing Markets by Preston G. Smith , 2008 .

[13]  Stefan H. Thomke,et al.  Managing Experimentation in the Design of New Products , 1998 .

[14]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Generalised models of design interation using signal flow graphs , 1997 .

[15]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[16]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A predictive model of sequential iteration in engineering design , 1997 .

[17]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Product Evolution: A Reverse Engineering and Redesign Methodology , 1998 .

[18]  Yong Zeng,et al.  A science-based approach to product design theory Part II: formulation of design requirements and products , 1999 .

[19]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Using Parameterized Pareto Sets to Model Design Concepts , 2007 .

[20]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  Axiomatic Design Theory for Systems , 1998 .

[21]  Mitchell M. Tseng,et al.  Evolutionary product line design balancing customer needs and product commonality , 2009 .

[22]  Michele Germani,et al.  A structured agile design approach to support customisation in wellness product development , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[23]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Holistic Customer Requirements and the Design-Select Decision , 1999 .

[24]  Mei Cao,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Product concept and prototype flexibility in manufacturing : Implications for customer satisfaction , 2015 .

[25]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Designing the design process , 1990 .