Registration and fusion quantification of augmented reality based nasal endoscopic surgery

HighlightsThe impacts of registration and fusion display errors on the navigation accuracy are quantitively studied on a custom ARNES.Accuracy level of a calibrated endoscope is redefined by using a calibration tool with improved structural reliability.A point cloud‐based hybrid tracking method is proposed to rapidly shorten the duration of intraoperative recalibration.The dynamic endoscopic vision expansion, hierarchical rendering, is validated thoroughly in model studies and clinical trials. ABSTRACT This paper quantifies the registration and fusion display errors of augmented reality‐based nasal endoscopic surgery (ARNES). We comparatively investigated the spatial calibration process for front‐end endoscopy and redefined the accuracy level of a calibrated endoscope by using a calibration tool with improved structural reliability. We also studied how registration accuracy was combined with the number and distribution of the deployed fiducial points (FPs) for positioning and the measured registration time. A physically integrated ARNES prototype was customarily configured for performance evaluation in skull base tumor resection surgery with an innovative approach of dynamic endoscopic vision expansion. As advised by surgical experts in otolaryngology, we proposed a hierarchical rendering scheme to properly adapt the fused images with the required visual sensation. By constraining the rendered sight in a known depth and radius, the visual focus of the surgeon can be induced only on the anticipated critical anatomies and vessel structures to avoid misguidance. Furthermore, error analysis was conducted to examine the feasibility of hybrid optical tracking based on point cloud, which was proposed in our previous work as an in‐surgery registration solution. Measured results indicated that the error of target registration for ARNES can be reduced to 0.77 ± 0.07 mm. For initial registration, our results suggest that a trade‐off for a new minimal time of registration can be reached when the distribution of five FPs is considered. For in‐surgery registration, our findings reveal that the intrinsic registration error is a major cause of performance loss. Rigid model and cadaver experiments confirmed that the scenic integration and display fluency of ARNES are smooth, as demonstrated by three clinical trials that surpassed practicality. Graphical abstract Figure. No caption available.

[1]  Mitsuo Umezu,et al.  Clinical Application of a Surgical Navigation System for Thoracoabdominal Aortic Replacement , 2007 .

[2]  R.J. Maciunas,et al.  An automatic technique for finding and localizing externally attached markers in CT and MR volume images of the head , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Ichiro Sakuma,et al.  Augmented Reality Navigation With Automatic Marker-Free Image Registration Using 3-D Image Overlay for Dental Surgery , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Li Liu,et al.  Surgical instrument recognition and calibration for optical tracking system , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[5]  Huazhong Shu,et al.  Artifact Suppressed Dictionary Learning for Low-Dose CT Image Processing , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  J M Fitzpatrick,et al.  The role of registration in accurate surgical guidance , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[7]  M. Fried,et al.  The use of image‐guided surgery in endoscopic sinus surgery: an evidence‐based review with recommendations , 2013, International forum of allergy & rhinology.

[8]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality image registration techniques , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[9]  Michael T Lawton,et al.  Novel embalming solution for neurosurgical simulation in cadavers. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  R. Marmulla,et al.  Image-to-patient registration techniques in head surgery. , 2006, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[11]  Makoto Hashizume,et al.  Augmented reality navigation system for laparoscopic splenectomy in children based on preoperative CT image using optical tracking device , 2012, Pediatric Surgery International.

[12]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Clinical application of a surgical navigation system based on virtual laparoscopy in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer , 2016, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[13]  Hongen Liao,et al.  3-D Augmented Reality for MRI-Guided Surgery Using Integral Videography Autostereoscopic Image Overlay , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Yonghuai Liu,et al.  Convex Hull Aided Registration Method (CHARM) , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[15]  Jay B. West,et al.  Designing optically tracked instruments for image-guided surgery , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Leo Joskowicz,et al.  Fiducial Optimization for Minimal Target Registration Error in Image-Guided Neurosurgery , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Jaana M. Hartikainen,et al.  RAD51B in Familial Breast Cancer , 2016, PloS one.

[18]  Chen Ling The Surgical Navigation System , 2003 .

[19]  Thomas Wendler,et al.  Image navigation as a means to expand the boundaries of fluorescence-guided surgery , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Yue Liu,et al.  Augmented reality based surgery navigation system , 2009, International Conference on Optical Instruments and Technology.

[21]  Takayuki Kitasaka,et al.  Externally Navigated Bronchoscopy Using 2-D Motion Sensors: Dynamic Phantom Validation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Amin B. Kassam,et al.  Neuronavigation in Endonasal Pituitary and Skull Base Surgery Using an Auto-Registration Mask without Head Fixation: An Assessment of Accuracy and Practicality , 2012 .

[23]  O. Ratib,et al.  Augmented reality and image overlay navigation with OsiriX in laparoscopic and robotic surgery: not only a matter of fashion , 2011, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.

[24]  Makoto Hashizume,et al.  An augmented reality navigation system for pediatric oncologic surgery based on preoperative CT and MRI images. , 2013, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[25]  Daniel Mirota,et al.  Architecture of a high-performance surgical guidance system based on C-arm cone-beam CT: software platform for technical integration and clinical translation , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[26]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Intraoperative Laparoscope Augmentation for Port Placement and Resection Planning in Minimally Invasive Liver Resection , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  Michael J. Daly,et al.  A surgical navigation system for non-contact diffuse optical tomography and intraoperative cone-beam CT , 2014, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[28]  Matthias Gondan,et al.  Navigation system for minimally invasive esophagectomy: experimental study in a porcine model , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[29]  J. Marescaux,et al.  Augmented reality in laparoscopic surgical oncology. , 2011, Surgical oncology.

[30]  Leila Besharati Tabrizi,et al.  Augmented reality-guided neurosurgery: accuracy and intraoperative application of an image projection technique. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery.

[31]  Qiang Zhao,et al.  Magnetic Navigation for Thoracic Aortic Stent-graft Deployment Using Ultrasound Image Guidance , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  Maki Sugimoto Recent advances in visualization, imaging, and navigation in hepatobiliary and pancreatic sciences , 2010, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.

[33]  David E. Breen,et al.  Calibration Requirements and Procedures for a Monitor-Based Augmented Reality System , 1995, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[34]  Daniel Mirota,et al.  Evaluation of a System for High-Accuracy 3D Image-Based Registration of Endoscopic Video to C-Arm Cone-Beam CT for Image-Guided Skull Base Surgery , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[35]  Leo Joskowicz,et al.  Localization and registration accuracy in image guided neurosurgery: a clinical study , 2008, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[36]  Danni Ai,et al.  3-Points Convex Hull Matching (3PCHM) for fast and robust point set registration , 2016, Neurocomputing.

[37]  H. Meinzer,et al.  Augmented reality visualization during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2011, Journal of endourology.

[38]  Yongtian Wang,et al.  Kinect based real-time position calibration for nasal endoscopic surgical navigation system , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[39]  Federico Hernández-Alfaro,et al.  3D planning in orthognathic surgery: CAD/CAM surgical splints and prediction of the soft and hard tissues results - our experience in 16 cases. , 2012, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[40]  Luc Soler,et al.  An augmented reality system for liver thermal ablation: Design and evaluation on clinical cases , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[41]  M. Feuerstein,et al.  Navigation in endoscopic soft tissue surgery: perspectives and limitations. , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[42]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Comparison of different registration methods for surgical navigation in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. , 2008, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[43]  Weijian Cong,et al.  Automatic radial distortion correction for endoscope image , 2013, 2013 6th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP).

[44]  Armin Kanitsar,et al.  Intra-operative virtual endoscopy for image guided endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery , 2010, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[45]  Daniel Mirota,et al.  A System for Video-Based Navigation for Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[46]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[47]  Jan Egger,et al.  Development of a surgical navigation system based on augmented reality using an optical see-through head-mounted display , 2015, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[48]  Jian Yang,et al.  A Novel Augmented Reality Navigation System for Endoscopic Sinus and Skull Base Surgery: A Feasibility Study , 2016, PloS one.

[49]  Nicholas A. Giovinco,et al.  A Heads-Up Display for Diabetic Limb Salvage Surgery , 2014, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[50]  L. Joskowicz,et al.  Target and Trajectory Clinical Application Accuracy in Neuronavigation , 2011, Neurosurgery.

[51]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[52]  Naoki Suzuki,et al.  Clinical application of navigation surgery using augmented reality in the abdominal field , 2015, Surgery Today.

[53]  Michael J. Daly,et al.  Augmented Real-Time Navigation with Critical Structure Proximity Alerts for Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery , 2012 .

[54]  David E. Breen,et al.  Calibration Requirements and Procedures for Augmented Reality , 1997 .