Multivariate cross-frequency coupling via generalized eigendecomposition

This paper presents a new framework for analyzing cross-frequency coupling in multichannel electrophysiological recordings. The generalized eigendecomposition-based cross-frequency coupling framework (gedCFC) is inspired by source-separation algorithms combined with dynamics of mesoscopic neurophysiological processes. It is unaffected by factors that confound traditional CFC methods—such as non-stationarities, non-sinusoidality, and non-uniform phase angle distributions—attractive properties considering that brain activity is neither stationary nor perfectly sinusoidal. The gedCFC framework opens new opportunities for conceptualizing CFC as network interactions with diverse spatial/topographical distributions. Five specific methods within the gedCFC framework are detailed, these are validated in simulated data and applied in several empirical datasets. gedCFC accurately recovers physiologically plausible CFC patterns embedded in noise that causes traditional CFC methods to perform poorly. The paper also demonstrates that spike-field coherence in multichannel local field potential data can be analyzed using the gedCFC framework, which provides significant advantages over traditional spike-field coherence analyses. Null-hypothesis testing is also discussed. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21792.001

[1]  E. Walsh Autonomy of alpha rhythm generators studied by multiple channel cross-correlation. , 1958, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  L. Cao Practical method for determining the minimum embedding dimension of a scalar time series , 1997 .

[3]  R. Kass,et al.  Shrinkage Estimators for Covariance Matrices , 2001, Biometrics.

[4]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Blind Source Separation via Generalized Eigenvalue Decomposition , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[5]  A. J. Batista-Leyva,et al.  On the interpretation of , 2004 .

[6]  K. Stadlthanner,et al.  Blind source separation using time-delayed signals , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37541).

[7]  Juha Karhunen,et al.  Advances in blind source separation (BSS) and independent component analysis (ICA) for nonlinear mixtures , 2004, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[8]  Harri Valpola,et al.  Denoising Source Separation , 2005, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[9]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Recipes for the linear analysis of EEG , 2005, NeuroImage.

[10]  S. Makeig,et al.  Imaging human EEG dynamics using independent component analysis , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[11]  Ana Maria Tomé,et al.  The generalized eigendecomposition approach to the blind source separation problem , 2006, Digit. Signal Process..

[12]  Jonathan Z. Simon,et al.  Denoising based on time-shift PCA , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  O. Jensen,et al.  Cross-frequency coupling between neuronal oscillations , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  Srikantan S. Nagarajan,et al.  Source Localization of EEG/MEG Data by Correlating Columns of ICA Solution with Lead Field Matrix , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP '07.

[16]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Hippocampal Network Dynamics Constrain the Time Lag between Pyramidal Cells across Modified Environments , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Behavior-dependent short-term assembly dynamics in the medial prefrontal cortex , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  O. Jensen,et al.  Asymmetric Amplitude Modulations of Brain Oscillations Generate Slow Evoked Responses , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[20]  Adriano B. L. Tort,et al.  Sharp edge artifacts and spurious coupling in EEG frequency comodulation measures , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[21]  O. Jensen,et al.  Gamma Power Is Phase-Locked to Posterior Alpha Activity , 2008, PloS one.

[22]  Biyu J. He,et al.  The Temporal Structures and Functional Significance of Scale-free Brain Activity , 2010, Neuron.

[23]  Alain de Cheveigné,et al.  Time-shift denoising source separation , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[24]  Théodore Papadopoulo,et al.  OpenMEEG: opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics , 2010, Biomedical engineering online.

[25]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Measuring phase-amplitude coupling between neuronal oscillations of different frequencies. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  R. Knight,et al.  The functional role of cross-frequency coupling , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  S. Boker,et al.  Time Delay Embedding Increases Estimation Precision of Models of Intraindividual Variability , 2010, Psychometrika.

[28]  Moritz Grosse-Wentrup,et al.  Multisubject Learning for Common Spatial Patterns in Motor-Imagery BCI , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[29]  Konrad P Kording,et al.  How advances in neural recording affect data analysis , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  A 4 Hz Oscillation Adaptively Synchronizes Prefrontal, VTA, and Hippocampal Activities , 2011, Neuron.

[31]  J. Fell,et al.  The role of phase synchronization in memory processes , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  M. Elam,et al.  Unraveling superimposed EEG rhythms with multi-dimensional decomposition , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[33]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  A novel method for reliable and fast extraction of neuronal EEG/MEG oscillations on the basis of spatio-spectral decomposition , 2011, NeuroImage.

[34]  Theodoros P. Zanos,et al.  Removal of spurious correlations between spikes and local field potentials. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[36]  J. Sprott,et al.  Neural network method for determining embedding dimension of a time series , 2011 .

[37]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar , 2012, PloS one.

[38]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Cross-Frequency Phase–Phase Coupling between Theta and Gamma Oscillations in the Hippocampus , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Multivariate Phase–Amplitude Cross-Frequency Coupling in Neurophysiological Signals , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[40]  M. Kahana,et al.  Phase–Amplitude Coupling in Human Electrocorticography Is Spatially Distributed and Phase Diverse , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  J. Lisman,et al.  The Theta-Gamma Neural Code , 2013, Neuron.

[42]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Interplay of Hippocampus and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory , 2013, Current Biology.

[43]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Dynamic Interactions between Large-Scale Brain Networks Predict Behavioral Adaptation after Perceptual Errors , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[45]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Cross-frequency coupling in real and virtual brain networks , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[46]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  A method for event-related phase/amplitude coupling , 2013, NeuroImage.

[47]  Kun Hu,et al.  Detecting phase-amplitude coupling with high frequency resolution using adaptive decompositions , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[48]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging , 2014, NeuroImage.

[49]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Joint decorrelation, a versatile tool for multichannel data analysis , 2014, NeuroImage.

[50]  Saskia Haegens,et al.  Inter- and intra-individual variability in alpha peak frequency , 2014, NeuroImage.

[51]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Dimensionality reduction for large-scale neural recordings , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Analyzing Neural Time Series Data: Theory and Practice , 2014 .

[53]  A. de Cheveigné,et al.  Scanning for oscillations , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[54]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Phase-clustering bias in phase–amplitude cross-frequency coupling and its removal , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[55]  Supratim Ray Challenges in the quantification and interpretation of spike-LFP relationships , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[56]  M. Wibral,et al.  Untangling cross-frequency coupling in neuroscience , 2014, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[57]  Alexandre Hyafil,et al.  Neural Cross-Frequency Coupling: Connecting Architectures, Mechanisms, and Functions , 2015, Trends in Neurosciences.

[58]  Alexandre Hyafil,et al.  Misidentifications of specific forms of cross-frequency coupling: three warnings , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[59]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Delay Differential Analysis of Time Series , 2015, Neural Computation.

[60]  Shantanu P. Jadhav,et al.  Multiple modes of hippocampal–prefrontal interactions in memory-guided behavior , 2016, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[61]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  Neuronal Oscillations with Non-sinusoidal Morphology Produce Spurious Phase-to-Amplitude Coupling and Directionality , 2016, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[62]  Juan L. P. Soto,et al.  A multivariate method for estimating cross-frequency neuronal interactions and correcting linear mixing in MEG data, using canonical correlations , 2016, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[63]  Eric Maris,et al.  Rhythmic Components in Extracranial Brain Signals Reveal Multifaceted Task Modulation of Overlapping Neuronal Activity , 2016, PloS one.

[64]  Andrew C. Heusser,et al.  Episodic sequence memory is supported by a theta-gamma phase code , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[65]  Bingni W. Brunton,et al.  Extracting spatial–temporal coherent patterns in large-scale neural recordings using dynamic mode decomposition , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[66]  E. Maris,et al.  Physiological Plausibility Can Increase Reproducibility in Cognitive Neuroscience , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[67]  S. Jones When brain rhythms aren't ‘rhythmic’: implication for their mechanisms and meaning , 2016, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[68]  L. Colgin,et al.  Spatial Sequence Coding Differs during Slow and Fast Gamma Rhythms in the Hippocampus , 2016, Neuron.

[69]  Susan G. Wardle,et al.  Decoding Dynamic Brain Patterns from Evoked Responses: A Tutorial on Multivariate Pattern Analysis Applied to Time Series Neuroimaging Data , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[70]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Comparison of linear spatial filters for identifying oscillatory activity in multichannel data , 2016, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[71]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Rhythmic entrainment source separation: Optimizing analyses of neural responses to rhythmic sensory stimulation , 2016, NeuroImage.

[72]  R. Arriaga,et al.  eLIFE , 2019, Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing.