Electrodermal activity as a measure of cognitive load: a methodological approach

Electrodermal activity (EDA) is commonly utilized as a tool for validating psychological constructs such as emotions, affect, or cognitive load. The assumptions underlying EDA signal usefulness for psychological research is still being debated. There is a need of one, coherent methodological framework which convincingly explains the correspondence between the outcomes expected by the theory, and the actual features of the signal obtained from experiments. Thus, the scope of our work was to estimate what signal analysis workflow, and which signal features are the most appropriate for studying psychological and/or cognitive factors. We designed an experiment to detect the presence of the cognitive load during performing a task (as compared to no-task condition). The obtained data represented one of the three cognitive states: 1) baseline rest (listening to the sounds of the forest); 2) faster breathing (cognitively easy, but forcing EDA response); and 3) playing a video game (a demanding task which should elicit EDA signal increase). The analysis revealed that EDA may be successfully adapted to indirect estimation of cognitive load for given psychological state, however, further research is required in order to exactly estimate which signal features most accurately differentiate between task vs. no-task conditions.

[1]  J. Westerink,et al.  Considerations for emotion-aware consumer products. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  Slava Kalyuga Cognitive Load Theory: How Many Types of Load Does It Really Need? , 2011 .

[3]  Anton van Boxtel,et al.  Differences in autonomic physiological responses between good and poor inductive reasoners , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[4]  A. Mihailidis,et al.  A cardiorespiratory classifier of voluntary and involuntary electrodermal activity , 2010, Biomedical engineering online.

[5]  Martin Page,et al.  Galvanic skin responses from asking stressful questions. , 2007, British journal of nursing.

[6]  W. Boucsein Electrodermal activity, 2nd ed. , 2012 .

[7]  Jan-Louis Kruger,et al.  Measuring the impact of subtitles on cognitive load: eye tracking and dynamic audiovisual texts , 2013, ETSA '13.

[8]  K. Byth,et al.  Decrement of the skin conductance response to repeated volitional inspiration , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  D. Leutner,et al.  Direct Measurement of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[10]  Juan-Manuel Belda-Lois,et al.  EMG and GSR signals for evaluating user's perception of different types of ceramic flooring. , 2009 .

[11]  S. Levenstein,et al.  Development of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: a new tool for psychosomatic research. , 1993, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[12]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Electrodermal Activity in Psychological Research , 1973 .

[14]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Inferring psychological significance from physiological signals. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[15]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Instructional benefits of spoken words: A review of cognitive load factors , 2012 .

[16]  G. Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Habituation of the orienting response to complex sequences of stimuli. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[17]  Howard Rosenbaum,et al.  Effects of reading proficiency on embedded stem priming in primary school children , 2021 .