Common Ground and Small Group Interaction in Large Virtual World Gatherings

Virtual worlds can allow conversational participants to achieve common ground in situations where the information volume and need for clarification is low. We argue in favor of this assertion through an examination of a semi-structured activity among hundreds of users held in a virtual world. Through the idea of implicit grounding, we argue that the affordances of contextualized space, knowledge of the social occasion, and creative self presentation allowed attendees to achieve common ground in a low information volume, low clarification need activity. We use the success of the event to reexamine and extend Clark and Brennan??s work on grounding in communication.

[1]  Steve Benford,et al.  Fragmented interaction: establishing mutual orientation in virtual environments , 1998, CSCW '98.

[2]  Steve Benford,et al.  User embodiment in collaborative virtual environments , 1995, CHI '95.

[3]  Helena M. Mentis,et al.  Supporting content and process common ground in computer-supported teamwork , 2009, CHI.

[4]  Steve Benford,et al.  MASSIVE: a collaborative virtual environment for teleconferencing , 1995, TCHI.

[5]  Steve Benford,et al.  Supporting awareness and interaction through collaborative virtual interfaces , 1999, UIST '99.

[6]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Perception of Shared Visual Space: Establishing Common Ground in Real and Virtual Environments , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[7]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Visual Information as a Conversational Resource in Collaborative Physical Tasks , 2003, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[8]  Steve Benford,et al.  Introducing Third Party Objects into the Spatial Model of Interaction , 1997, ECSCW.

[9]  B. Webber,et al.  Elements of Discourse Understanding , 1983 .

[10]  John L. Arnott,et al.  Using spatial cues to improve videoconferencing , 1992, CHI.

[11]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Referring as a Collaborative Process , 2003 .

[12]  Sara A. Bly,et al.  Media spaces: bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment , 1993, CACM.

[13]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Re-space-ing place: "place" and "space" ten years on , 2006, CSCW '06.

[14]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[15]  John Bowers,et al.  Talk and embodiment in collaborative virtual environments , 1996, CHI.

[16]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Action as language in a shared visual space , 2004, CSCW.

[17]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[18]  Ilona Heldal,et al.  Successes and Failures in Co-Present Situations , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[19]  David R. Traum,et al.  Embodied agents for multi-party dialogue in immersive virtual worlds , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[20]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Distributed Work , 2002 .

[21]  Xiaolan Fu,et al.  Video helps remote work: speakers who need to negotiate common ground benefit from seeing each other , 1999, CHI '99.

[22]  Daniel B. Horn,et al.  Grounding needs: achieving common ground via lightweight chat in large, distributed, ad-hoc groups , 2005, CHI.

[23]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  --Understanding Effects of Proximity on Collaboration : Implications for Technologies to Support Remote Collaborative Work , 2001 .

[24]  N. Sadat Shami,et al.  Synchronous interaction among hundreds: an evaluation of a conference in an avatar-based virtual environment , 2011, CHI.