The Chicken Chorioallantoic Membrane as a Low-Cost, High-Throughput Model for Cancer Imaging

Purpose Mouse models are invaluable tools for radiotracer development and validation. They are, however, expensive, low throughput, and are constrained by animal welfare considerations. Here, we assessed the chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) as an alternative to mice for preclinical cancer imaging studies. Methods Growth of NCI-H460 Fluc tumors on the CAM was optimized using a range of physical and chemical supports. Tumor-bearing eggs were imaged by dynamic 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) or (4S)-4-(3-18F-fluoropropyl)-L-glutamate (18F-FSPG) PET/CT following intravenous injection, with mice bearing subcutaneous NCI-H460 Fluc xenografts imaged with 18F-FDG for comparison. The dependence of the transporter system xc- on in ovo 18F-FSPG tumor uptake was determined through treatment with imidazole ketone erastin. Additionally, 18F-FSPG PET/CT was used to monitor treatment response in ovo 24 h following external beam radiotherapy. Results NCI-H460 Fluc cells grown in Matrigel formed vascularized tumors of reproducible size without compromising embryo viability. By designing a simple method for cannulation it was possible to perform dynamic PET imaging in ovo, producing high tumor-to-background signal for both 18F-FDG and 18F-FSPG. 18F-FDG tumor uptake kinetics were similar in ovo and in vivo, with 18F-FSPG providing an early marker of both treatment response and target inhibition in CAM-grown tumors. Conclusions The CAM provides a low-cost alternative to tumor xenograft mouse models which may broaden access to PET and SPECT imaging. Rapid tumor growth and high-quality PET images that can be obtained with this model suggest its potential use for early radiotracer screening, pharmacological studies, and monitoring response to therapy.

[1]  M. Luster,et al.  How to Xenograft Cancer Cells on the Chorioallantoic Membrane of a Fertilized Hen's Egg and Its Visualization by PET/CT and MRI. , 2023, ACS applied bio materials.

[2]  Dimitra K. Georgiou,et al.  Feasibility of [18F]FSPG PET for Early Response Assessment to Combined Blockade of EGFR and Glutamine Metabolism in Wild-Type KRAS Colorectal Cancer , 2023, Tomography.

[3]  T. Helbich,et al.  CAM-Xenograft Model Provides Preclinical Evidence for the Applicability of [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor in CRC Imaging , 2022, Cancers.

[4]  Richard H. T. Edwards,et al.  Radiotracer stereochemistry affects substrate affinity and kinetics for improved imaging of system xC- in tumors , 2022, Theranostics.

[5]  G. Glatting,et al.  Comparison of Quantification of Target-Specific Accumulation of [18F]F-siPSMA-14 in the HET-CAM Model and in Mice Using PET/MRI , 2021, Cancers.

[6]  Y. Ni,et al.  Utilisation of Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane as a Model Platform for Imaging-Navigated Biomedical Research , 2021, Cells.

[7]  Richard H. T. Edwards,et al.  Robust and Facile Automated Radiosynthesis of [18F]FSPG on the GE FASTlab , 2020, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[8]  J. Scoazec,et al.  Exploitation of the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) as a platform for anti-metastatic drug testing , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[9]  J. Fellenberg,et al.  Optimization of the chicken chorioallantoic membrane assay as reliable in vivo model for the analysis of osteosarcoma , 2019, PloS one.

[10]  Z. Nyitrai,et al.  High-Throughput PET/CT Imaging Using a Multiple-Mouse Imaging System , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  M. Lythgoe,et al.  Measurement of Tumor Antioxidant Capacity and Prediction of Chemotherapy Resistance in Preclinical Models of Ovarian Cancer by Positron Emission Tomography , 2019, Clinical Cancer Research.

[12]  M. Lythgoe,et al.  Assessment of Tumor Redox Status through (S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-L-Glutamic Acid PET Imaging of System xc - Activity. , 2018, Cancer research.

[13]  V. Sée,et al.  CDK inhibitors reduce cell proliferation and reverse hypoxia-induced metastasis of neuroblastoma tumours in a chick embryo model , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[14]  S. Horvat,et al.  Transgenic Mouse Models in Cancer Research , 2018, Front. Oncol..

[15]  H. Endepols,et al.  Discovery of 7-[18F]Fluorotryptophan as a Novel Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Probe for the Visualization of Tryptophan Metabolism in Vivo. , 2018, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[16]  D. Ribatti The chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay. , 2017, Reproductive toxicology.

[17]  T. Weil,et al.  The CAM cancer xenograft as a model for initial evaluation of MR labelled compounds , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[18]  D. Ribatti The chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM). A multifaceted experimental model , 2016, Mechanisms of Development.

[19]  C. Waschkies,et al.  Comparison of medetomidine, thiopental and ketamine/midazolam anesthesia in chick embryos for in ovo Magnetic Resonance Imaging free of motion artifacts , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[20]  S. Ametamey,et al.  Investigation of the chick embryo as a potential alternative to the mouse for evaluation of radiopharmaceuticals. , 2015, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[21]  Patrycja Nowak-Sliwinska,et al.  The chicken chorioallantoic membrane model in biology, medicine and bioengineering , 2014, Angiogenesis.

[22]  Claudia Kuntner,et al.  Quantitative preclinical PET imaging: opportunities and challenges , 2014, Front. Physics.

[23]  H. Saluz,et al.  Dynamic behaviour of selected PET tracers in embryonated chicken eggs. , 2013, Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular.

[24]  A. Luxen,et al.  In Vivo PET/CT in a Human Glioblastoma Chicken Chorioallantoic Membrane Model: A New Tool for Oncology and Radiotracer Development , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  M. Rosa-Calatrava,et al.  The chicken chorioallantoic membrane tumor assay as model for qualitative testing of oncolytic adenoviruses , 2011, Cancer Gene Therapy.

[26]  M. Balke,et al.  Morphologic characterization of osteosarcoma growth on the chick chorioallantoic membrane , 2010, BMC Research Notes.

[27]  Marius Raica,et al.  The chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane as a model to study tumor metastasis , 2008, Angiogenesis.

[28]  A. Richmond,et al.  Mouse xenograft models vs GEM models for human cancer therapeutics , 2008, Disease Models & Mechanisms.

[29]  Robert Gurny,et al.  The chick embryo and its chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) for the in vivo evaluation of drug delivery systems. , 2007, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[30]  Andreas Bikfalvi,et al.  Accessing key steps of human tumor progression in vivo by using an avian embryo model. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  R. Kerbel What is the Optimal Rodent Model for Anti-tumor Drug Testing? , 1998, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[32]  J. Quigley,et al.  Tumor Cell Intravasation Alu-cidated The Chick Embryo Opens the Window , 1998, Cell.

[33]  P. Houghton,et al.  Role of murine tumor models in cancer treatment research. , 1986, Cancer research.

[34]  L. S. Gall,et al.  Chemotherapeutic Testing with Sodium Sulfathiazole in the Developing Chick Embryo , 1941 .

[35]  V. Sée,et al.  The Chorioallantoic Membrane of the Chick Embryo to Assess Tumor Formation and Metastasis. , 2016, Methods in molecular biology.

[36]  Meng Yang,et al.  Development of a green fluorescent protein metastatic-cancer chick-embryo drug-screen model , 2004, Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

[37]  S. Schmidt,et al.  Quantitation of angiogenesis in the chick chorioallantoic membrane model using fractal analysis. , 1996, Microvascular research.