The paper analyzes the functional relationship between profitability and market share for type of businesses in the PIMS data base. Although a linear relationship has been imposed in other studies, our result shows that empirically it seems a poor representation of the data. In addition, three observations seem to be most evident. First, small-share businesses were not per se less successful than larger business units. In the service market and the market for raw or semi-finished materials small-share businesses were just as profitable or even more profitable than larger business units. Second, some businesses were ‘stuck in the middle’, which was most evident in the service market but also in the retail and wholesale markets. Third, very large-share businesses were often less profitable. A critical market share was identified as between 65 and 70 percent. Beyond that level the ROI decreased.
[1]
R. D. Buzzell,et al.
The PIMS Principles: Linking Strategy to Performance
,
1987
.
[2]
D. Ravenscraft.
Structure-Profit Relationships at the Line of Business and Industry Level
,
1983
.
[3]
P. Geroski.
Specification and Testing the Profits-Concentration Relationship: Some Experiments for the UK
,
1981
.
[4]
Keith Cowling,et al.
PRICE-COST MARGINS AND MARKET STRUCTURE
,
1976
.
[5]
B. Gale,et al.
Market Share and Rate of Return
,
1972
.
[6]
W. G. Shepherd,et al.
The Elements of Market Structure
,
1972
.