Fundamentals of Inverse Problems: Background chapter from Electric Field Imaging Thesis

Inverse problems involve estimating an underlying continuous function from a set of measurements of some aspect of the function. The mapping from the underlying continuous function to the measurements is known as the forward or direct problem. The forward problem must be a well-posed physical problem. If x is an underlying function and y is a set of measurements, then x and y are related by a forward mapping operator F : F (x) = y. Note that x and y are not members of the same space|often x is in nite dimensional and y is nite dimensional. The inverse problem is to recover x from a measured y using the inverse operator F 1 and (as we will see) regularization, or extra information about the underlying function. The reason we need the extra information about x is that inverse problems are typically ill-posed. Strictly speaking, to be well-posed, an inverse problem would have to have the following properties: (1) solutions x must be unique, (2) for any data y a solution must exist, and (3) solutions must be stable, so that small perturbations in the data do not lead to large perturbations in the reconstruction.[Isa89] The second, existence condition is often ignored, since in practical situations the data will have been generated from an actual forward problem, guaranteeing the existence of an inverse. (However, it is conceivable that measurement noise might complicate this.) The real di culties in practice have to do with the rst and third conditions: in some problems, the same data set may have multiple feasible explanations ( rst problem), or two very similar data sets may have very di erent explanations (third problem). In the latter case, the noise inherent

[1]  D. Mackay,et al.  Bayesian methods for adaptive models , 1992 .

[2]  David Isaacson,et al.  Layer stripping: a direct numerical method for impedance imaging , 1991 .

[3]  John G. Webster,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography , 1991 .

[4]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  Measurement and reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography , 1991 .

[5]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes , 1990 .

[6]  Kohn,et al.  Variational constraints for electrical-impedance tomography. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[7]  J. Berryman Stable iterative reconstruction algorithm for nonlinear traveltime tomography , 1990 .

[8]  Victor Isakov,et al.  Inverse Source Problems , 1990 .

[9]  B. Brown,et al.  Applied potential tomography. , 1989, Journal of the British Interplanetary Society.

[10]  J. Berryman,et al.  Fermat's principle and nonlinear traveltime tomography. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[11]  Stephen F. Gull,et al.  Developments in Maximum Entropy Data Analysis , 1989 .

[12]  A Sezginer The inverse source problems of magnetostatics and electrostatics , 1987 .

[13]  J. Sylvester,et al.  A global uniqueness theorem for an inverse boundary value problem , 1987 .

[14]  R. Kohn,et al.  Determining conductivity by boundary measurements II. Interior results , 1985 .

[15]  Robert V. Kohn,et al.  Determining conductivity by boundary measurements , 1984 .

[16]  Robert V. Kohn,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF AN UNKNOWN CONDUCTIVITY BY MEANS OF MEASUREMENTS AT THE BOUNDARY. , 1983 .

[17]  Richard Gordon,et al.  Questions of uniqueness and resolution in reconstruction from projection , 1978 .

[18]  L. B. Slichter The Interpretation of the Resistivity Prospecting Method for Horizontal Structures , 1933 .