Mobile health application for remote oral cancer surveillance.

BACKGROUND To determine the effectiveness of a mobile phone-based remote oral cancer surveillance program (Oncogrid) connecting primary care dental practitioners and frontline health care workers (FHW) with oral cancer specialists. METHODS The study population (N = 3,440) included a targeted cohort (n = 2,000) and an opportunistic cohort (n = 1,440) screened by FHW and dental professionals, respectively. The authors compared the screening efficacy in both groups, with specialist diagnosis considered the reference standard. The outcomes measured were lesion detection and capture of interpretable images of the oral cavity. RESULTS In the targeted cohort, among 51 of 81 (61%) interpretable images, 23 of 51 (45%) of the lesions were confirmed by specialists, while the opportunistic cohort showed 100% concordance with the specialists (106 of 106). Sixty-two of 129 (48%) of the recommended patients underwent biopsy; 1 of 23 (4%) were in the targeted cohort, and 61 of 106 (57%) were in the opportunistic cohort. Ninety percent of the lesions were confirmed to be malignant or potentially malignant. CONCLUSIONS The mobile health-based approach adopted in this study aided remote early detection of oral cancer by primary care dental practitioners in a resource-constrained setting. Further optimization of this program is required to adopt the system for FHW. Evaluation of its efficacy in a larger population is also warranted. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS The increased efficiency of early detection by dentists, when assisted by a remote mobile health-based approach, is a step toward a more effective oral cancer screening program.

[1]  Philip Sloan,et al.  Evaluation of a new binary system of grading oral epithelial dysplasia for prediction of malignant transformation. , 2006, Oral oncology.

[2]  C. Letellier,et al.  Detection of lung cancer relapse using self-reported symptoms transmitted via an Internet Web-application: pilot study of the sentinel follow-up , 2014, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[3]  S. Fedele,et al.  The World Cancer Report and the burden of oral cancer. , 2004, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[4]  U. Menon,et al.  A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effect of Two Phone-Based Interventions on Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence , 2011, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[5]  Malcolm Clarke,et al.  Global forum on telemedicine: connecting the world through partnerships. , 2008, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[6]  S. Feig Screening mammography: a successful public health initiative. , 2006, Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health.

[7]  D. Hailey,et al.  Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of telemedicine , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[8]  L. Satyamurthy,et al.  Indian Space Research Organization and telemedicine in India. , 2009, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[9]  M. Sperandio,et al.  Factors predicting malignant transformation in oral potentially malignant disorders among patients accrued over a 10-year period in South East England. , 2011, Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology.

[10]  N. Concin,et al.  Specific serologic response to genital human papillomavirus types in patients with vulvar precancerous and cancerous lesions. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  G. Thomas,et al.  Effect of screening on oral cancer mortality in Kerala, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial , 2005, The Lancet.

[12]  Ken Russell Coelho Challenges of the Oral Cancer Burden in India , 2012, Journal of cancer epidemiology.

[13]  K. Stoltze,et al.  Long-term treatment outcome of oral premalignant lesions. , 2006 .

[14]  Saroj Kanta Mishra,et al.  Telemedicine in India: current scenario and the future. , 2009, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[15]  L. Barnes,et al.  Pathology and genetics of head and neck tumours , 2005 .

[16]  A. Piattelli,et al.  bcl-2 expression and apoptotic bodies in 13-cis-retinoic acid (isotretinoin)-topically treated oral leukoplakia: a pilot study. , 1999, Oral oncology.

[17]  Justin Starren,et al.  Telemedicine for retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis: evaluation and challenges. , 2009, Survey of ophthalmology.

[18]  P. Davis,et al.  Videoconferences for rural physicians’ continuing health education , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[19]  J. Epstein,et al.  Topical application of vitamin A to oral leukoplakia – a clinical case series , 2000 .

[20]  J. Baeten,et al.  Molecular Imaging of Oral Premalignant and Malignant Lesions Using Fluorescently Labeled Lectins , 2014, Translational oncology.

[21]  F. Bray,et al.  Cancer mortality in India: a nationally representative survey , 2012, The Lancet.

[22]  G. Thomas,et al.  Long term effect of visual screening on oral cancer incidence and mortality in a randomized trial in Kerala, India. , 2013, Oral oncology.

[23]  A. Suresh,et al.  Mouth self-examination to improve oral cancer awareness and early detection in a high-risk population. , 2011, Oral oncology.

[24]  A. Brown,et al.  Predictive Value of Dysplasia Grading and DNA Ploidy in Malignant Transformation of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders , 2013, Cancer Prevention Research.

[25]  Jeffrey M. Ashburner,et al.  A Cluster-Randomized Trial of a Primary Care Informatics-Based System for Breast Cancer Screening , 2011, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[26]  V. Patel,et al.  Suicide mortality in India: a nationally representative survey , 2012, The Lancet.

[27]  S. Warnakulasuriya Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. , 2009, Oral oncology.