Antithrombin III in critically ill patients: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Objective To evaluate the benefits and harms of antithrombin III in critically ill patients. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Data sources CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, International Web of Science, LILACS, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and CINHAL (to November 2006); hand search of reference lists, contact with authors and experts, and search of registers of ongoing trials. Review methods Two reviewers independently selected parallel group randomised clinical trials comparing antithrombin with placebo or no intervention and extracted data related to study methods, interventions, outcomes, bias risk, and adverse events. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Trials in any type of critically ill patients in intensive care were eligible. All trials, irrespective of blinding or language status, that compared any antithrombin III regimen with no intervention or placebo were included. Trials were considered to be at low risk of bias if they had adequate randomisation procedure, blinding, and used intention to treat analysis. Risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated with fixed and random effects models according to heterogeneity. Main outcome measures Mortality, length of stay in intensive care or hospital, quality of life, severity of sepsis, respiratory failure, duration of mechanical ventilation, incidence of surgical intervention, intervention effect among various populations, and adverse events (such as bleeding). Results 20 trials randomly assigning 3458 patients met inclusion criteria. Eight trials had low risk of bias. Compared with placebo or no intervention, antithrombin III did not reduce overall mortality (relative risk 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.03). No subgroup analyses on risk of bias, populations of patients, or with and without adjuvant heparin yielded significant results. Antithrombin III increased the risk of bleeding events (1.52, 1.30 to 1.78). Heterogeneity was observed in only a few analyses. Conclusion Antithrombin III cannot be recommended for critically ill patients based on the available evidence.

[1]  B. Zehnbauer,et al.  A META‐ANALYSIS OF CONTROLLED TRIALS OF ANTICOAGULANT THERAPIES IN PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS , 2003, Shock.

[2]  L. Gluud Bias in clinical intervention research. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  T. van der Poll,et al.  New treatment strategies for disseminated intravascular coagulation based on current understanding of the pathophysiology , 2004, Annals of medicine.

[5]  P. Gøtzsche,et al.  Why we need a broad perspective on meta-analysis , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  S. Opal,et al.  Quality of life effects of antithrombin III in sepsis survivors: results from the KyberSept trial [ISRCTN22931023] , 2002, Critical care.

[7]  J Ean,et al.  Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  S. Opal,et al.  Antithrombin, heparin, and heparan sulfate , 2002, Critical care medicine.

[9]  B. Schmidt,et al.  Antithrombin for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[10]  P. Periti Current treatment of sepsis and endotoxaemia , 2000, Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy.

[11]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  K. Thorlund,et al.  Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[13]  J. Römisch,et al.  The anti-inflammatory actions of antithrombin--a review. , 2002, Acta medica Austriaca.

[14]  G. Clermont,et al.  Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[15]  K. K. Lan,et al.  Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials , 1983 .