Infrastructure design is always a very complex task because of the many variables involved. Rail design, in particular, takes on considerable importance (together with the socioeconomic variables) among the environmental variables. The latter is a factor that contributes strongly to the definition of design choices. This paper proposes a method for optimizing the choice of the corridors/line of “high speed rail” (HSR). In particular, the method is based on “multi criteria analysis” with geographic information system (GIS) support. The method was applied to a real case in order to evaluate its economic feasibility, social and environmental impact. Three possible corridors (conservative, compromise and innovative) are considered for the construction of high-speed rail lines in an area located in the south of Italy. The analysis performed gave the following results: (1) a conservative point of view: the better hypothesis was a corridor near the coast but more tortuous; this solution preserves the environment but involves higher costs and greater "travel time"; (2) an innovative point of view and a compromised point of view: the better hypothesis was a corridor crossing the territory in the central part (central park zone of great importance for the environment). In this case the corridor gives higher speeds and lower “travel times”; however for this solution the environmental components are jeopardized to a greater degree.
[1]
M. Sharifi,et al.
Spatial multiple criteria decision analysis in integrated planning for public transport and land use development study in Klang Valley, Malaysia
,
2006
.
[2]
Laurence Turcksin,et al.
The Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis (MAMCA) application in the Flemish long-term decision making process on mobility and logistics
,
2010
.
[3]
Theodor J. Stewart,et al.
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis
,
2001
.
[4]
Kim Bang Salling,et al.
MCDA and risk analysis in transport infrastructure appraisals: The Rail Baltica case
,
2011
.
[5]
S. S. Keshkamat,et al.
The formulation and evaluation of transport route planning alternatives: a spatial decision support system for the Via Baltica project, Poland
,
2009
.
[6]
Ricardo Mateus,et al.
Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA): Central Porto high-speed railway station
,
2008,
Eur. J. Oper. Res..
[7]
Monique Monville-Burston,et al.
The development of oral expression skills at first year university level: Use of simulations
,
1985
.
[8]
David Banister,et al.
Assessment of large transport infrastructure projects: The CBA-DK model
,
2009
.
[9]
Ming Zhang,et al.
High-Speed Rail Project Development Processes in the United States and China
,
2010
.