Trends in science coverage: a content analysis of three US newspapers

This paper describes a content analysis of science news reporting in three major daily newspapers, the New York Times, the Chicago Tribune, and the Washington Post, during the last three decades. It was found that although science articles represent only a small percentage of the total number of articles printed, this percentage has steadily increased with each time period. The results also show that, at least in the newspapers analysed, science coverage does not differ substantially in terms of the range of topics covered, as well as information that has been both included and omitted from science news accounts. Although there were some differences between articles appearing in the different time frames, in general science news reporting has not changed significantly in terms of the comprehensiveness of accounts. An especially significant finding is that articles frequently omitted methodological and contextual information, features most often mentioned as critical for a complete journalistic account of science.

[1]  Michael Ryan A Factor Analytic Study of Scientists' Responses to Errors , 1975 .

[2]  Accuracy of Health Research Reported in the Popular Press: Breast Cancer and Mammography , 1995 .

[3]  K. E. Rowan Moving beyond the What to the Why: Differences in Professional and Popular Science Writing , 1989 .

[4]  Sharon Dunwoody,et al.  Scientists as Mass Media Sources , 1982 .

[5]  Renate G. Bader,et al.  How Science News Sections Influence Newspaper Science Coverage: A Case Study , 1990 .

[6]  S. Priest,et al.  Science content and social context , 1995 .

[7]  M. Long Scientific explanation in US newspaper science stories , 1995 .

[8]  Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al.  Was There Really a Popular Science “Boom”? , 1987 .

[9]  R. Goodell Problems with the Press: Who's Responsible? , 1985 .

[10]  William R. Elliott,et al.  Science Coverage in Three Newspapers and Three Supermarket Tabloids , 1989 .

[11]  Eleanor Singer,et al.  A Question of Accuracy: How Journalists and Scientists Report Research on Hazards. , 1990 .

[12]  D. Lynn Pulford,et al.  Follow-Up of Study of Science News Accuracy , 1976 .

[13]  Carroll J. Glynn,et al.  Communication and Energy Conservation , 1987 .

[14]  Jonathon T. Rich A Measure of Comprehensiveness in Newsmagazine Science Coverage , 1981 .

[15]  J. Patterson A Q Study of Attitudes of Young Adults about Science and Science News , 1982 .

[16]  William Evans The Mundane and the Arcane: Prestige Media Coverage of Social and Natural Science , 1995 .

[17]  Sharon Dunwoody,et al.  A question of accuracy , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[18]  Jocelyn Steinke,et al.  Reaching Readers , 1995 .

[19]  H. Meissner,et al.  How sources of health information relate to knowledge and use of cancer screening exams , 1992, Journal of community health.

[20]  Scientific Sources' Perceptions of Network News Accuracy , 1985 .

[21]  P. J. Tichenor,et al.  Mass Communication Systems and Communication Accuracy in Science News Reporting , 1970 .

[22]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Public understanding of science: from contents to processes , 1988 .

[23]  W. A. Scott,et al.  Reliability of Content Analysis ; The Case of Nominal Scale Cording , 1955 .

[24]  F. Molitor Accuracy in Science News Reporting by Newspapers: The Case of Aspirin for the Prevention of Heart Attacks , 1993 .

[25]  C. Z. Nunn Readership and Coverage of Science and Technology in Newspapers , 1979 .

[26]  Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al.  Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology , 1988 .

[27]  S. Friedman,et al.  Alar and apples: newspapers, risk and media responsibility , 1996, Public understanding of science.

[28]  Edward Caudill,et al.  The New England Journal of Medicine as News Source , 1989 .

[29]  James W. Tankard,et al.  News Source Perceptions of Accuracy of Science Coverage , 1974 .

[30]  Allan Mazur,et al.  Media Coverage and Public Opinion on Scientific Controversies , 1981 .

[31]  A. Ferri,et al.  Scientists' Reasons for Consenting to Mass Media Interviews: A National Survey , 1991 .

[32]  Carroll J. Glynn,et al.  Sensationalism in Science Issues: A Case Study , 1982 .