SPATIAL STRUCTURES AS GENERALISATION SUPPORT SERVICES

While standards for automated access and presentation of cartographic data over the internet are defined, services for automated generalisation and the transfer and storage of the data involved are not yet standardised. Web service technologies can be used to establish an interoperable framework between different generalisation systems. The service architectures can be distinguished into middleware services, which are delivering original and/or pre-generalised data from a database through a WMS or WFS, and research platforms which provide only access to the generalisation operators and can be used with own data. Three categories of generalisation web services are identified. Support services are enriching the raw input data with additional information or expressing structural and spatial relationships. Operator services deliver the functionalities of individual generalisation operators and take enriched data as input. And finally, process services use the two other service types in order to control the generalisation process. The modelling of structural and spatial relationships is critical for the understanding of the role of cartographic features and thus for the automated generalisation. On one hand the relationships can be hierarchical structures between map features or feature classes. On the other hand there can be relations between the features themselves which can be expressed by matrices or graphs. This paper aims to discuss and define which types of support services can be established for enriching the raw input data and how the complex output of such services can be represented and used in a web services environment.

[1]  Robert Weibel,et al.  Modelling the Overall Process of Generalisation , 2007 .

[2]  Emmanuel Fritsch,et al.  The Importance of Geometric Modeling in Linear Feature Generalization , 1995 .

[3]  Monika Sester,et al.  Real-time generalisation and multiple representation in the GiMoDig mobile service , 2004 .

[4]  Anura Gurugé,et al.  Universal Description, Discovery, and Integration , 2004 .

[5]  Robert Weibel,et al.  Building displacement over a ductile truss , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Robert Weibel Models and Experiments for Adaptive Computer-Assisted Terrain Generalization , 1992 .

[7]  D. Box,et al.  Simple object access protocol (SOAP) 1.1 , 2000 .

[8]  Monika Sester,et al.  Multiple representation and interoperability of spatial data , 2006 .

[9]  Robert B McMaster,et al.  Generalization in Digital Cartography , 2008 .

[10]  Robert B Mc Master,et al.  Generalization in Digital Cartography Resource Publications in Geography , 1992 .

[11]  Klaus Greve,et al.  Building SDIs with Free Software - the deegree project , 2004 .

[12]  Robert Weibel,et al.  Data Enrichment for Adaptive Generalisation , 2004 .

[13]  Christopher B. Jones,et al.  Automated map generalization with multiple operators: a simulated annealing approach , 2003, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Karl-Heinrich Anders,et al.  Parameterfreies hierarchisches Graph-Clustering-Verfahren zur Interpretation raumbezogener Daten , 2004 .

[15]  Leila De Floriani,et al.  Hierarchical triangulation for multiresolution surface description , 1995, TOGS.

[16]  J.W.N. van Smaalen,et al.  Automated aggregation of geographic objects: A new approach to the conceptual generalisation of geographic databases , 2003 .

[17]  Nicolas Regnauld SPATIAL STRUCTURES TO SUPPORT AUTOMATIC GENERALISATION , 2005 .

[18]  Robert Weibel,et al.  Generalization Services on the Web—Classification and an Initial Prototype Implementation , 2005 .

[19]  L. Harrie,et al.  Map generalisation technology: addressing the need for a common research platform , 2003 .

[20]  Robert Weibel,et al.  Using an Energy Minimization Technique for Polygon Generalization , 2003 .

[21]  K. Ridgway,et al.  Geological Society of America Bulletin , 1997 .

[22]  Monika Sester GENERALIZATION BASED ON LEAST SQUARES ADJUSTMENT , 2000 .

[23]  Sabine Timpf,et al.  Hierarchical Structures in Map Series , 1998 .

[24]  W. Mackaness,et al.  Use of Graph Theory to Support Map Generalization , 1993 .

[25]  Anne Ruas,et al.  A Method vor Building Displacement in Automated Map Generalisation , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[26]  Moritz Neun,et al.  Web Services for an Open Generalisation Research Platform , 2005 .

[27]  Lars Harrie,et al.  The Constraint Method for Solving Spatial Conflicts in Cartographic Generalization , 1999 .

[28]  B. Moulin,et al.  WHAT IS SPATIAL CONTEXT IN CARTOGRAPHIC GENERALISATION , 2002 .

[29]  A. N. Strahler DYNAMIC BASIS OF GEOMORPHOLOGY , 1952 .

[30]  P. Højholt Solving Space Conflicts in Map Generalization: Using a Finite Element Method , 2000 .

[31]  Andy Schürr,et al.  GXL: toward a standard exchange format , 2000, Proceedings Seventh Working Conference on Reverse Engineering.

[32]  C. Werner Formal Analysis of Ridge and Channel Patterns in Maturely Eroded Terrain , 1988 .

[33]  R. Horton EROSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF STREAMS AND THEIR DRAINAGE BASINS; HYDROPHYSICAL APPROACH TO QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY , 1945 .