Radiation-Force Assisted Targeting Facilitates Ultrasonic Molecular Imaging
暂无分享,去创建一个
Susannah H Bloch | Paul A Dayton | Katherine W Ferrara | Mark Borden | Shukui Zhao | P. Dayton | M. Borden | K. Ferrara | D. Kruse | S. H. Bloch | Dustin Kruse | Shukui Zhao
[1] Samuel A Wickline,et al. Targeted ultrasonic contrast agents for molecular imaging and therapy. , 2001, Current problems in cardiology.
[2] J. G. Miller,et al. Targeting of ultrasound contrast material. An in vitro feasibility study. , 1997, Acta radiologica. Supplementum.
[3] P. Dayton,et al. Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.
[4] P. Dayton,et al. Changes in the echoes from ultrasonic contrast agents with imaging parameters , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.
[5] A. Szeri,et al. Coupled dynamics of translation and collapse of acoustically driven microbubbles. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] Jonathan R. Lindner,et al. Imaging Tumor Angiogenesis With Contrast Ultrasound and Microbubbles Targeted to &agr;v&bgr;3 , 2003 .
[7] P. Dayton,et al. Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior: effect of transmitted phase and bubble size , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.
[8] J. Lindner. Evolving applications for contrast ultrasound. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.
[9] Jonathan R. Lindner,et al. Noninvasive Assessment of Angiogenesis by Ultrasound and Microbubbles Targeted to &agr;v-Integrins , 2003, Circulation.
[10] S. Slack,et al. Particle diameter influences adhesion under flow. , 2001, Biophysical journal.
[11] M. Longo,et al. Dissolution behavior of lipid monolayer-coated, air-filled microbubbles: Effect of lipid hydrophobic chain length , 2002 .
[12] T. Leighton. 5 – Effects and Mechanisms , 1994 .
[13] P. Dayton,et al. Acoustic radiation force in vivo: a mechanism to assist targeting of microbubbles. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[14] E. Unger,et al. Targeted-Microbubble Binding Selectively to GPIIb IIIa Receptors of Platelet Thrombi , 2002, Investigative radiology.
[15] P J Lund,et al. Evaluation of new thrombus-specific ultrasound contrast agent. , 1998, Academic radiology.
[16] Paul A Dayton,et al. Targeted imaging using ultrasound , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[17] J. G. Miller,et al. A novel site-targeted ultrasonic contrast agent with broad biomedical application. , 1996, Circulation.
[18] T. Leighton. The Acoustic Bubble , 1994 .
[20] P. Dayton,et al. Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.
[21] E. Unger,et al. In vitro studies of a new thrombus-specific ultrasound contrast agent. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.
[22] Paul A Dayton,et al. The magnitude of radiation force on ultrasound contrast agents. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] K. Nightingale,et al. A preliminary evaluation of the effects of primary and secondary radiation forces on acoustic contrast agents , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.
[24] N. Pandian,et al. Enhanced visualization of intravascular and left atrial appendage thrombus with the use of a thrombus-targeting ultrasonographic contrast agent (MRX-408A1): In vivo experimental echocardiographic studies. , 1999, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.