Learning verb alternations in a usage-based Bayesian model

One of the key debates in language acquisition involves the degree to which children’s early linguistic knowledge employs abstract representations. While usage-based accounts that focus on input-driven learning have gained prominence, it remains an open question how such an approach can explain the evidence for children’s apparent use of abstract syntactic generalizations. We develop a novel hierarchical Bayesian model that demonstrates how abstract knowledge can be generalized from usage-based input. We demonstrate the model on the learning of verb alternations, showing that such a usage-based model must allow for the inference of verb class structure, not simply the inference of individual constructions, in order to account for the acquisition of alternations.

[1]  B. MacWhinney The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[2]  Afra Alishahi,et al.  A Probabilistic Model of Early Argument Structure Acquisition , 2005 .

[3]  A. Goldberg Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language , 2006 .

[4]  Cynthia Fisher,et al.  The role of abstract syntactic knowledge in language acquisition: a reply to Tomasello (2000) , 2002, Cognition.

[5]  Hanna Wallach,et al.  Structured Topic Models for Language , 2008 .

[6]  C. Fisher,et al.  Two-year-olds use distributional cues to interpret transitivity-alternating verbs , 2009, Language and cognitive processes.

[7]  Beth Levin,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993 .

[8]  Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer,et al.  2003 Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. , 2022 .

[9]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: an alternative account. , 2001, Journal of child language.

[10]  S. Gries,et al.  Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on `alternations' , 2004 .

[11]  Suzanne Stevenson,et al.  A General Feature Space for Automatic Verb Classification , 2003, EACL.

[12]  E. Conwell,et al.  Early syntactic productivity: Evidence from dative shift , 2007, Cognition.

[13]  M. Tomasello Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition , 2003 .

[14]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Variability, negative evidence, and the acquisition of verb argument constructions. , 2010, Journal of child language.

[15]  Alon Lavie,et al.  High-accuracy Annotation and Parsing of CHILDES Transcripts , 2007 .

[16]  A. L. Campbell,et al.  The acquisition of English dative constructions , 2001, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[17]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Unsupervised and Constrained Dirichlet Process Mixture Models for Verb Clustering , 2009 .

[18]  Susannah Kirby,et al.  A statistical model of the grammatical choices in child production of dative sentences , 2012 .

[19]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes , 2006 .