Biotope patterns and abundance of meadow plant species in a Norwegian rural landscape

The main purpose of this study was to describe the relative importance of hay meadows and other types of semi-natural grasslands for species diversity and to focus on the impact of the fragmentation of hay meadows on species diversity. The study area was the rural districts of Hjartdal and Seljord in the county of Telemark, southern Norway. Interrelationships between the landscape and vegetation were revealed by combining research at three hierarchical levels, i.e. the landscape, biotope and species levels. A descriptive and analytical technique based on CIR aerial photo interpretation was developed for the landscape mesoscale. The historical background of the landscape and former biotope patterns were described, since traditional and sustained management is an important parameter in the landscape ecological analysis. The vegetation of different grassland biotopes was classified and numerically analysed. The results of the aerial photo interpretation revealed a landscape with considerable complexity and high biodiversity both at landscape level and at biotope and species level, due to the many traditional hay meadows and pastures still left in this area. The results also showed that the remaining fragments of traditional hay meadows are of vital importance for biological diversity. They had the highest average number of species per subplot and furthermore contained species that did not occur in any other grassland biotopes. In addition, the largest populations of several grassland species were found in the traditionally managed hay meadows. Unfertilised pastures and verges along small roads were also species-rich but were not in this connection substitutes for the hay meadows, nor were the `modern' hay meadows or the verges along the main roads. The spatial distribution and configuration of the biotopes and the abundance of meadow plant species within the study area suggest that in order to maintain species diversity it may be important to preserve and manage all the remaining fragments of traditional hay meadows. The surrounding environment, the matrix, should also be managed appropriately.

[1]  M. Ihse,et al.  Biological values of the Nordic cultural landscape: Different perspectives , 1995 .

[2]  S. M. Glenn,et al.  A HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS OF SPECIES' ABUNDANCE PATTERNS , 1990 .

[3]  J. Hodgson.  Commonness and rarity in plants with special reference to the Sheffield flora Part I: The identity, distribution and habitat characteristics of the common and rare species , 1986 .

[4]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  Update notes: Canoco, version 3.10 , 1990 .

[5]  S. Handel.  CHAPTER 8 – Pollination Ecology, Plant Population Structure, and Gene Flow , 1983 .

[6]  T. Økland,et al.  Data manipulation and gradient length estimation in DCA ordination , 1990 .

[7]  M. Turner,et al.  Changes in landscape patterns in Georgia, USA , 1988, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  J. Oostermeijer,et al.  Pollination ecology and patch-dependent reproductive success of the rare perennial Gentiana pneumonanthe L. , 1995, The New phytologist.

[9]  Henry Howe,et al.  Ecology of Seed Dispersal , 1982 .

[10]  J. Olesen,et al.  Temporal changes in pollen flow and neighbourhood structure in a population of Saxifraga hirculus L. , 1989, Oecologia.

[11]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  CANOCO - a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [etrended] [canonical] correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1) , 1988 .

[12]  M. Zobel,et al.  High species richness in an Estonian wooded meadow , 1991 .

[13]  A. García.  Conserving the species-rich meadows of Europe , 1992 .

[14]  M. Ihse,et al.  Swedish agricultural landscapes : patterns and changes during the last 50 years, studied by aerial photos , 1995 .

[15]  J. Oostermeijer,et al.  Pollination ecology and constraints on seed set of the rare perennial Gentiana cruciata L. in The Netherlands , 1995 .

[16]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships , 1958 .

[17]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  Partial canonical correspondence analysis , 1988 .

[18]  Arthur S. Lieberman,et al.  Landscape Ecology , 1994, Springer New York.

[19]  O. Eriksson,et al.  Species abundance patterns of plants in Swedish semi-natural pastures , 1995 .

[20]  D. Levin.  Dispersal Versus Gene Flow in Plants , 1981 .

[21]  F. Rohlf,et al.  NTSYS-pc Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, version 2.1: Owner manual , 1992 .

[22]  A. Norderhaug.  Mating systems of three meadow plant species , 1995 .

[23]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Indices of landscape pattern , 1988, Landscape Ecology.

[24]  J. Oostermeijer.  Myrmecochory in Polygala vulgaris L., Luzula campestris (L.) DC. and Viola curtisii Forster in a Dutch dune area , 1989, Oecologia.

[25]  H. Sjörs.  Slåtterängar i Grangärde finnmark , 1954 .

[26]  O. Bastian,et al.  Anthropogenic landscape changes in Central Europe and the role of bioindication , 1993, Landscape Ecology.

[27]  M. W. Eijck,et al.  Offspring fitness in relation to population size and genetic variation in the rare perennial plant species Gentiana pneumonanthe (Gentianaceae) , 1994, Oecologia.

[28]  Felix Kienast,et al.  Analysis of historic landscape patterns with a Geographical Information System — a methodological outline , 1993, Landscape Ecology.

[29]  D. Levin,et al.  Gene Flow in Seed Plants , 1974 .

[30]  K. Holsinger,et al.  The application of minimum viable population theory to plants. , 1991 .

[31]  H. Andrén,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review , 1994 .

[32]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .