Characterisation by Gaussian processes of finite substrate size effects on gain patterns of microstrip antennas

A procedure is presented for characterising the effects of varying finite substrate/ground plane size on the gain properties of microstrip antennas by means of Gaussian process regression (GPR). Two kinds of microstrip antenna were considered, namely a probe-fed patch antenna on both thin and thick dielectric substrates, and an L-probe-fed patch on a thick air substrate. CST Microwave Studio was used to generate training and test data for the GPR models. Frontal E and H-plane gain patterns could be predicted with normalised root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) of <1.8% for the thin-substrate probe-fed patch and the L-probe-fed patch; for the thick-substrate probe-fed patch, RMSEs were 2.1 and 2.8% for the two principal plane gain patterns, respectively. Furthermore, the GPR models could predict patterns at least two orders of magnitude faster than it took to obtain them via direct simulation in CST. Such models are expected to be useful in CAD-based environments for rapidly obtaining estimates of substrate/ground-plane size effects on gain characteristics in lieu of time-consuming full-wave simulations.

[1]  S. Koziel,et al.  Two-Stage Framework for Efficient Gaussian Process Modeling of Antenna Input Characteristics , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[2]  J. Huang,et al.  The finite ground plane effect on the microstrip antenna radiation patterns , 1983 .

[3]  Asok De,et al.  Estimation of radiation characteristics of different slotted microstrip antennas using a knowledge‐based neural networks model , 2014 .

[4]  Hao Ling,et al.  Application of Artificial Neural Networks to Broadband Antenna Design Based on a Parametric Frequency Model , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[5]  J. P. Jacobs Bayesian Support Vector Regression With Automatic Relevance Determination Kernel for Modeling of Antenna Input Characteristics , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[6]  M. Cacciola,et al.  Microwave Devices and Antennas Modelling by Support Vector Regression Machines , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[7]  A. Dadgarnia,et al.  A Fast Systematic Approach for Microstrip Antenna Design and Optimization using ANFIS and GA , 2010 .

[8]  Kwai-Man Luk,et al.  L-probe fed thick-substrate patch antenna mounted on a finite ground plane , 2003 .

[9]  J. P. Jacobs,et al.  Efficient Resonant Frequency Modeling for Dual-Band Microstrip Antennas by Gaussian Process Regression , 2015, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[10]  Mehmet Erler,et al.  Calculation of bandwidth for electrically thin and thick rectangular microstrip antennas with the use of multilayered perceptrons , 1999 .

[11]  F. E. Gardiol,et al.  Radiation pattern computation of microstrip antennas on finite size ground planes , 1992 .

[12]  Seref Sagiroglu,et al.  Neural computation of resonant frequency of electrically thin and thick rectangular microstrip antennas , 1999 .

[13]  Seref Sagiroglu,et al.  Generalized neural method to determine resonant frequencies of various microstrip antennas , 2002 .

[14]  J. W. Odendaal,et al.  The Effect of Manufacturing and Assembling Tolerances on the Performance of Double-Ridged Horn Antennas , 2010 .

[15]  A. K. Bhattacharyya Effects of finite ground plane on the radiation characteristics of a circular patch antenna , 1990 .