Self‐monitoring in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta‐analysis

SUMMARY

[1]  N. Black,et al.  The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[2]  G. Rutten,et al.  Feasibility and effects of a diabetes type II protocol with blood glucose self-monitoring in general practice. , 1990, Family practice.

[3]  D A Katerndahl,et al.  Variability in meta-analytic results concerning the value of cholesterol reduction in coronary heart disease: a meta-meta-analysis. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  J. Wylie-Rosett,et al.  Implementation of Treatment Protocols in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial , 1995, Diabetes Care.

[5]  R. Holman,et al.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. , 1998 .

[6]  D. Kerr,et al.  Comparison of blood or urine testing by patients with newly diagnosed non-insulin dependent diabetes: patient survey after randomised crossover trial , 1997, BMJ.

[7]  R. Holman,et al.  Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 1999, The Lancet.

[9]  S J Pocock,et al.  Repeated measures in clinical trials: analysis using mean summary statistics and its implications for design. , 1992, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  K. Alberti,et al.  Intensive attention improves glycaemic control in insulin-dependent diabetes without further advantage from home blood glucose monitoring: results of a controlled trial. , 1982 .

[11]  M. Gallichan.  Self‐monitoring by patients receiving oral hypoglycaemic agents: A survey and a comparative trial , 1994 .

[12]  Thomas J. Steichen,et al.  Tests for publication bias in meta-analysis , 1998 .

[13]  E. DeLong,et al.  Impact of Glucose Self-Monitoring on Non-lnsulin-Treated Patients With Type II Diabetes Mellitus: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Blood and Urine Testing , 1990, Diabetes Care.

[14]  M Gallichan,et al.  Self monitoring of glucose by people with diabetes: evidence based practice , 1997, BMJ.

[15]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[16]  G. Slama,et al.  Is glucose self-monitoring beneficial in non-insulin-treated diabetic patients? Results of a randomized comparative trial. , 1989, Diabete & metabolisme.

[17]  F. Schellevis,et al.  The Efficacy of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in NIDDM subjects: A criteria-based literature review , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[18]  Uk-Prospective-Diabetes-Study-Group.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) , 1998, The Lancet.

[19]  D. Ruta,et al.  Frequency of blood glucose monitoring in relation to glycaemic control: observational study with diabetes database , 1999, BMJ.

[20]  L. Epstein,et al.  Does self-monitoring of blood glucose levels improve dietary compliance for obese patients with type II diabetes? , 1986, The American journal of medicine.

[21]  M. Gulliford,et al.  Monitoring blood glucose control in diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. , 2000, Health technology assessment.

[22]  K. Mann,et al.  Follow-up Intervention: Its Effect on Compliance Behavior to a Diabetes Regimen , 1990, The Diabetes educator.

[23]  The Relationship of Glycemic Exposure (HbA1c) to the Risk of Development and Progression of Retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial , 1995, Diabetes.