Role of Anterior Segment OCT for Descemet Membrane Stripping During Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Eyes With Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy.

PURPOSE To report the utility of preoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) in decision-making for stripping of the Descemet membrane (DM) during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in eyes with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED). METHODS ASOCT was performed in eyes with CHED undergoing DMEK. Host DM was retained if the DM appearance was normal on ASOCT. Outcomes of DMEK with or without DM stripping (non DM stripping [DMEK]) were analyzed and compared regarding graft adhesion, graft clarity, visual acuity, and complications. RESULTS Twelve eyes of 8 patients were included in the series. Of these, 6 eyes (mean age, 6 ± 2.6 years, range 3-8 years) underwent nDMEK and 6 eyes (mean age, 23.6 ± 10.2 years, range 13-39 years) underwent standard DMEK. There were no intraoperative complications in either group. During the early postoperative period, one eye in the nDMEK group had donor detachment that was successfully managed by repeat air injection. The mean preoperative and postoperative corrected visual acuities were 1.15 and 0.37 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) in the nDMEK group, and 0.95 and 0.25 LogMAR in the DMEK group (P 0.39 and 0.06). Average endothelial cell counts were 1826 ± 318 cell/mm in the nDMEK group (32.3% loss), and 1708 ± 271 cells/mm in the DMEK group (33.6% loss) at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative anterior segment OCT is useful in decision-making regarding stripping of host DM during DMEK in eyes with CHED. The outcomes of nDMEK were similar to DMEK in this small series.

[1]  Tatsuya Inoue,et al.  Comparison of 5-Year Clinical Results of Descemet and Non-Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2019, Cornea.

[2]  Anthony N Kuo,et al.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Safety and Outcomes: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. , 2017, Ophthalmology.

[3]  C. Murphy,et al.  Outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy , 2017, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[4]  P. Vaddavalli,et al.  Paired-eye comparison of Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in children with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy , 2013, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[5]  S. Chaurasia,et al.  Endothelial keratoplasty without Descemet's stripping in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. , 2013, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[6]  K. Sugiyama,et al.  Clinical evaluation of non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (nDSAEK) , 2012, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

[7]  H. Anwar,et al.  Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy , 2012, Clinical ophthalmology.

[8]  V. Scorcia,et al.  Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. , 2011, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  V. Mittal,et al.  Successful Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty in Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy , 2011, Cornea.

[10]  Yan Li,et al.  Clinical and research applications of anterior segment optical coherence tomography – a review , 2009, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[11]  M. Terry,et al.  Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Simplified Technique to Minimize Graft Dislocation, Iatrogenic Graft Failure, and Pupillary Block , 2008 .

[12]  T. Møller-Pedersen,et al.  A morphological and functional study of Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy. , 1998, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[13]  A. E. Maumenee,et al.  Further studies of congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy of the cornea. , 1973, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  K. Kenyon,et al.  The pathogenesis of congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy of the cornea. , 1971, American journal of ophthalmology.