Improving the real-time probabilistic channel flood forecasting by incorporating the uncertainty of inflow using the particle filter

An accurate and reliable real-time flood forecast is crucial for mitigating flood disasters. The errors associated with the inflow boundary forcing data are considered as an important source of uncertainties in hydraulic model. In this paper, a real-time probabilistic channel flood forecasting model is developed with a novel function to incorporate the uncertainty of the forcing inflow. This new approach couples a hydraulic model with the particle filter (PF) data assimilation algorithm, a sequential Bayesian Monte Carlo method. The stage observations at hydrological stations are assimilated at each time step to update the model states in order to improve the next time step’s forecasting. This new approach is tested against a real flood event occurred in the upper Yangtze River. As compared with the open loop simulations, the evaluations of model performance with several deterministic and probabilistic metrics indicate that the accuracy of the ensemble mean prediction and the reliability of the uncertainty quantification are improved pronouncedly as a result of the PF assimilation. Further assessment of the prediction results at different lead times shows that the improvement of model performance deteriorates with the increase of the lead time due to the gradual diminishing of the updating effect for the initial conditions. Based on the analyses of the number of particles and the assimilation frequency, we find that the optimal number of particles can be determined by balancing the model performance and the computation cost, while a high assimilation frequency is preferred to incorporate the emerging observations to update the model states to match the real conditions.

[1]  Faming Liang,et al.  Explicitly integrating parameter, input, and structure uncertainties into Bayesian Neural Networks for probabilistic hydrologic forecasting , 2011 .

[2]  P. Bates,et al.  Progress in integration of remote sensing–derived flood extent and stage data and hydraulic models , 2009 .

[3]  Hongxiang Yan,et al.  A probabilistic drought forecasting framework: A combined dynamical and statistical approach , 2017 .

[4]  Ming Wang,et al.  Dual state-parameter optimal estimation of one-dimensional open channel model using ensemble Kalman filter , 2013 .

[5]  R. De Keyser,et al.  Towards the sequential assimilation of SAR-derived water stages into hydraulic models using the Particle Filter: proof of concept , 2010 .

[6]  S. Noh,et al.  Simultaneous estimation of inflow and channel roughness using 2D hydraulic model and particle filters , 2013 .

[7]  Jan Magnusson,et al.  Improving physically based snow simulations by assimilating snow depths using the particle filter , 2017 .

[8]  Fangjian Wang,et al.  An Improved Particle Filter Algorithm Based on Ensemble Kalman Filter and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[9]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Prospects for river discharge and depth estimation through assimilation of swath‐altimetry into a raster‐based hydrodynamics model , 2007 .

[10]  Zhongbo Yu,et al.  Coupled Hydraulic and Kalman Filter Model for Real-Time Correction of Flood Forecast in the Three Gorges Interzone of Yangtze River, China , 2013 .

[11]  Hamid Moradkhani,et al.  Towards an improved ensemble precipitation forecast: A probabilistic post-processing approach , 2017 .

[12]  A. Weerts,et al.  On noise specification in data assimilation schemes for improved flood forecasting using distributed hydrological models , 2013 .

[13]  M. Canty,et al.  Hydraulic parameter estimation by remotely-sensed top soil moisture observations with the particle filter , 2011 .

[14]  Peyman Abbaszadeh,et al.  Enhancing hydrologic data assimilation by evolutionary Particle Filter and Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 2018 .

[15]  John Turner,et al.  State of the Antarctic and Southern Ocean climate system , 2009 .

[16]  P. Bates,et al.  Optimal Cross-Sectional Spacing in Preissmann Scheme 1D Hydrodynamic Models , 2009 .

[17]  G. Lannoy,et al.  Assimilating SAR-derived water level data into a hydraulic model: A case study , 2011 .

[18]  David R. Maidment,et al.  GeoFlood: Large‐Scale Flood Inundation Mapping Based on High‐Resolution Terrain Analysis , 2018, Water Resources Research.

[19]  Hongwu Tang,et al.  Prediction of the future flood severity in plain river network region based on numerical model: A case study , 2017 .

[20]  M. W. Dunlop,et al.  Nonstationarity and reformation of high‐Mach‐number quasiperpendicular shocks: Cluster observations , 2007 .

[21]  Hongxiang Yan,et al.  Improving Soil Moisture Profile Prediction With the Particle Filter-Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Lei Huang,et al.  A real-time probabilistic channel flood-forecasting model based on the Bayesian particle filter approach , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[23]  Hamid Moradkhani,et al.  Toward a reliable prediction of seasonal forecast uncertainty: Addressing model and initial condition uncertainty with ensemble data assimilation and Sequential Bayesian Combination , 2014 .

[24]  V. Merwade,et al.  Estimation of uncertainty propagation in flood inundation mapping using a 1‐D hydraulic model , 2015 .

[25]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  Near‐Real‐Time Assimilation of SAR‐Derived Flood Maps for Improving Flood Forecasts , 2018, Water Resources Research.