Monaural speech intelligibility and detection in maskers with varying amounts of spectro-temporal speech features.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Birger Kollmeier | Thomas Brand | Stephan D Ewert | Wiebke Schubotz | B. Kollmeier | T. Brand | S. Ewert | Wiebke Schubotz
[1] Stuart Rosen,et al. Listening to speech in a background of other talkers: effects of talker number and noise vocoding. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] Martin Cooke,et al. A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] Birger Kollmeier,et al. Development and analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS) , 2010, International journal of audiology.
[4] G. Kidd,et al. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] Douglas S Brungart,et al. Cocktail party listening in a dynamic multitalker environment , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.
[6] Brian C J Moore,et al. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[7] Birger Kollmeier,et al. Tools to predict binaural speech intelligibility in complex listening environments for normal and hearing‐impaired listeners. , 2011 .
[8] Irwin Pollack,et al. Auditory informational masking , 1975 .
[9] S. Rosen,et al. Uncomodulated glimpsing in "checkerboard" noise. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] T Houtgast,et al. A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] B. Shinn-Cunningham. Object-based auditory and visual attention , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[12] Michael A. Akeroyd,et al. Variations in the Slope of the Psychometric Functions for Speech Intelligibility: A Systematic Survey , 2014, Trends in hearing.
[13] Deliang Wang,et al. Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al. Informational masking: counteracting the effects of stimulus uncertainty by decreasing target-masker similarity. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] Jesper Jensen,et al. An Algorithm for Intelligibility Prediction of Time–Frequency Weighted Noisy Speech , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.
[16] T. Houtgast,et al. The concept of signal-to-noise ratio in the modulation domain and speech intelligibility. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] K. S. Rhebergen,et al. A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] Torsten Dau,et al. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] A S Bregman,et al. Auditory grouping based on fundamental frequency and formant peak frequency. , 1990, Canadian journal of psychology.
[20] R A Lutfi,et al. How much masking is informational masking? , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] T. Dau,et al. Characterizing frequency selectivity for envelope fluctuations. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] Torsten Dau,et al. Modeling comodulation masking release using an equalization-cancellation mechanism. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] Jon Barker,et al. Modelling speaker intelligibility in noise , 2007, Speech Commun..
[24] Torsten Dau,et al. Modeling within- and across-channel processes in comodulation masking release. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] Joseph W. Hall,et al. Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] K. S. Rhebergen,et al. Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al. Note on informational masking (L) , 2003 .
[28] D S Brungart,et al. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] Birger Kollmeier,et al. Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] Torsten Dau,et al. A multi-resolution envelope-power based model for speech intelligibility. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] Lynn R. Gilbertson,et al. The information-divergence hypothesis of informational masking. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] Guy J. Brown,et al. Separation of Speech by Computational Auditory Scene Analysis , 2005 .
[33] H. Levitt. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] Informational masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2000, Acta oto-laryngologica.
[35] T. Houtgast. Frequency selectivity in amplitude-modulation detection. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[36] Thomas Brand,et al. Comparison of Different Short-Term Speech Intelligibility Index Procedures in Fluctuating Noise for Listeners with Normal and Impaired Hearing , 2013 .
[37] Brian C J Moore,et al. Notionally steady background noise acts primarily as a modulation masker of speech. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.