Capture–recapture models with heterogeneity to study survival senescence in the wild

Detecting senescence in wild populations and estimating its strength raise three challenges. First, in the presence of individual heterogeneity in survival probability, the proportion of high-survival individuals increases with age. This increase can mask a senescence-related decrease in survival probability when the probability is estimated at the population level. To accommodate individual heterogeneity we use a mixture model structure (discrete classes of individuals). Second, the study individuals can elude the observers in the field, and their detection rate can be heterogeneous. To account for detectability issues we use capture-mark-recapture (CMR) methodology, mixture models and data that provide information on indi-viduals' detectability. Last, emigration to non-monitored sites can bias survival estimates, because it can occur at the end of the individuals' histories and mimic earlier death. To model emigration we use Markovian transitions to and from an unobservable state. These different model structures are merged together using hidden Markov chain CMR models, or multievent models. Simulation studies illustrate that reliable evidence for survival senescence can be obtained using highly heterogeneous data from non site-faithful individuals. We then design a tailored application for a dataset from a colony of black-headed gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus. Survival probabilities do not appear individually variable, but evidence for survival senescence becomes significant only when accounting for other sources of heterogeneity. This result suggests that not accounting for heterogeneity leads to flawed inference and/or that emigration heterogeneity mimics survival heteroge-neity and biases senescence estimates.

[1]  A. N. Arnason,et al.  Parameter estimates from mark-recapture experiments on two populations subject to migration and death , 1972, Researches on Population Ecology.

[2]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Estimation of sex‐specific survival with uncertainty in sex assessment , 2008 .

[3]  Roger Pradel,et al.  U‐CARE: Utilities for performing goodness of fit tests and manipulating CApture–REcapture data , 2009 .

[4]  Roger Pradel,et al.  RE-EVALUATION OF ADULT SURVIVAL OF BLACK-HEADED GULLS (LARUS RIDIBUNDUS) IN PRESENCE OF RECAPTURE HETEROGENEITY , 1998 .

[5]  S. Wanless,et al.  Increased adult mortality and reduced breeding success with age in a population of common guillemot Uria aalge using marked birds of unknown age , 2006 .

[6]  S. Amstrup,et al.  Effects of Earlier Sea Ice Breakup on Survival and Population Size of Polar Bears in Western Hudson Bay , 2007 .

[7]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Individual variation in reproductive costs of reproduction: high-quality females always do better. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[8]  A. Yashin,et al.  Heterogeneity's ruses: some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics. , 1985, The American statistician.

[9]  M. Bester,et al.  A longitudinal study of senescence in a pinniped , 2002 .

[10]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Web-based Supplementary Materials for “ Modeling Individual Effects in the Cormack-Jolly-Seber Model : A State-space Formulation ” , 2010 .

[11]  Jean Clobert,et al.  Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[12]  G. E. Woolfenden,et al.  Consequences of heterogeneity in survival probability in a population of Florida scrub-jays. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[13]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Multievent: An Extension of Multistate Capture–Recapture Models to Uncertain States , 2005, Biometrics.

[14]  Evan G. Cooch,et al.  Multistate capture–recapture analysis under imperfect state observation: an application to disease models , 2009 .

[15]  D. Peart,et al.  Dealing with death data: individual hazards, mortality and bias , 2003 .

[16]  Roger Pradel,et al.  ESTIMATING SURVIVAL AND TEMPORARY EMIGRATION IN THE MULTISTATE CAPTURE–RECAPTURE FRAMEWORK , 2004 .

[17]  J. K. Miller,et al.  Escaping senescence: demographic data from the three-toed box turtle (Terrapene carolina triunguis) , 2001, Experimental Gerontology.

[18]  James E. Hines,et al.  ESTIMATION OF SEX-SPECIFIC SURVIVAL FROM CAPTURE-RECAPTURE DATA WHEN SEX IS NOT ALWAYS KNOWN , 2004 .

[19]  J. Gaillard,et al.  The estimation of age-specific breeding probabilities from recaptures or resightings in vertebrate populations: II. Longitudinal models. , 1990, Biometrics.

[20]  J. Lebreton,et al.  Marked Individuals in the Study of Bird Population , 1993 .

[21]  J. Clobert,et al.  Social personalities influence natal dispersal in a lizard , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Anne Lohrli Chapman and Hall , 1985 .

[23]  Hal Caswell,et al.  A GENERAL APPROACH TO TEMPORARY EMIGRATION IN MARK–RECAPTURE ANALYSIS , 2002 .

[24]  M. Conroy,et al.  Modeling demographic processes in marked populations , 2009 .

[25]  Calyampudi R. Rao,et al.  Linear statistical inference and its applications , 1965 .

[26]  L. Kruuk,et al.  The rate of senescence in maternal performance increases with early-life fecundity in red deer. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[27]  J. Lebreton Régulation par le recrutement chez la mouette rieuse Larus ridibundus , 1987, Revue d'Écologie. Supplément.

[28]  H. Whitehead,et al.  Heterogeneity and the markrecapture assessment of the Scotian Shelf population of northern bottlenose whales (Hyperoodon ampullatus) , 2005 .

[29]  Roger Pradel,et al.  CAPTURE-RECAPTURE SURVIVAL MODELS TAKING ACCOUNT OF TRANSIENTS , 1997 .

[30]  James E. Hines,et al.  TESTS FOR SENESCENT DECLINE IN ANNUAL SURVIVAL PROBABILITIES OF COMMON POCHARDS, AYTHYA FERINA , 1997 .

[31]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Program E-Surge: A Software Application for Fitting Multievent Models , 2009 .

[32]  P. Switzer Past reproductive success affects future habitat selection , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[33]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Senescence rates are determined by ranking on the fast-slow life-history continuum. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[34]  Carl J. Schwarz,et al.  Estimating migration rates using tag-recovery data , 1993 .

[35]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Fitness consequences of avian personalities in a fluctuating environment , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  J. Congdon,et al.  Testing hypotheses of aging in long-lived painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) , 2003, Experimental Gerontology.

[37]  S. Verhulst,et al.  Age‐Dependent Traits: A New Statistical Model to Separate Within‐ and Between‐Individual Effects , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[38]  Kenneth H Pollock,et al.  Open Capture–Recapture Models with Heterogeneity: II. Jolly–Seber Model , 2010, Biometrics.

[39]  P. Medawar UNSOLVED problem of biology. , 1953, The Medical journal of Australia.

[40]  P. Greenwood Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  S. Pledger Unified Maximum Likelihood Estimates for Closed Capture–Recapture Models Using Mixtures , 2000, Biometrics.

[42]  Roger Pradel,et al.  A general framework for modeling memory in capture—Recapture data , 2009 .

[43]  Roger Pradel,et al.  The Risk of Flawed Inference in Evolutionary Studies When Detectability Is Less than One , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[44]  Intermittent breeding in the Herring Gull Larus argentatus and the Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus , 2008 .

[45]  Lain L. MacDonald,et al.  Hidden Markov and Other Models for Discrete- valued Time Series , 1997 .

[46]  W. Link,et al.  Individual Covariation in Life‐History Traits: Seeing the Trees Despite the Forest , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[47]  Marco Festa-Bianchet,et al.  AGE‐SPECIFIC SURVIVAL IN FIVE POPULATIONS OF UNGULATES: EVIDENCE OF SENESCENCE , 1999 .

[48]  Roger Pradel,et al.  The Stakes of Capture–Recapture Models with State Uncertainty , 2009 .

[49]  Caleb E. Finch,et al.  Longevity, senescence, and the genome , 1990 .

[50]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Is heterogeneity of catchability in capture–recapture studies a mere sampling artifact or a biologically relevant feature of the population? , 2008, Population Ecology.

[51]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  Life-history trade-offs favour the evolution of animal personalities , 2007, Nature.

[52]  Shirley Pledger,et al.  The Performance of Mixture Models in Heterogeneous Closed Population Capture–Recapture , 2005, Biometrics.

[53]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Modeling Survival and Testing Biological Hypotheses Using Marked Animals: A Unified Approach with Case Studies , 1992 .

[54]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[55]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Principles and interest of GOF tests for multistate capture-recapture models , 2005, Animal Biodiversity and Conservation.

[56]  A. N. Arnason,et al.  The estimation of population size, migration rates and survival in a stratified population , 1973, Researches on Population Ecology.

[57]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Mark-resighting analysis of a California gull population , 1995 .