The chicken egg and skull model of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery improves trainee drilling skills

BackgroundWe verified the effectiveness of training in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (eETSS) techniques using chicken eggs and a skull model. MethodsWe verified the area of eggshell removed by drilling when five residents and four experts used the chicken eggs and a skull model.ResultsWhen residents performed drilling on 10 eggs, a mean (± standard deviation [SD]) area of 31.2 ± 17.5 mm2 was removed from the first egg, and 104.8 ± 3.3 mm2 from the tenth and final egg, representing an increase in area and a decrease in SD. The experts performed the same drilling operation on a single egg, and removed a mean area of 257± 31.7 mm2. These results demonstrated that skills improved as a result of this training, and suggested that this method was also capable of overcoming the initial individual differences in the amount of force applied and ability. An obvious difference between residents and experts was seen in the area removed (p = 0.00011); however, this was attributed to differences in endoscopic manipulation, rather than drilling skill.ConclusionOur findings suggest that this training method could be adequate for acquiring eETSS techniques. Although experts showed superior endoscopic manipulation, residents may also be able to acquire adequate endoscopic skills through further training, and our training method appears to offer an effective means of improving eETSS techniques.

[1]  P. Gardner,et al.  ENDOSCOPIC RECONSTRUCTION OF THE CRANIAL BASE USING A PEDICLED NASOSEPTAL FLAP , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[2]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Optimal port locations for endoscopic intracorporeal knotting , 1997, Surgical Endoscop.

[3]  M. Grady,et al.  Erratum to "Comparison of endoscopic and microscopic removal of pituitary adenomas: Single-surgeon experience and the learning curve" [Neurosurg Focus 25, 6, (2008) E10] , 2008 .

[4]  Julian R. E. Davis,et al.  Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery: Evidence of an Operative Learning Curve , 2010, Neurosurgery.

[5]  A. Hino,et al.  Training in Microvascular Surgery Using a Chicken Wing Artery , 2003, Neurosurgery.

[6]  R. Carrau,et al.  Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: experience with 50 patients. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  S. Ceylan,et al.  The learning curve in endoscopic pituitary surgery and our experience , 2006, Neurosurgical Review.

[8]  J. Auque,et al.  How i do it: Head and neck and plastic surgery: Endoscopic pituitary tumor surgery , 1992, The Laryngoscope.

[9]  Amami Kato,et al.  Training in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery using a skull model and eggs , 2010, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[10]  M. Bergsneider,et al.  Making the transition from microsurgery to endoscopic trans-sphenoidal pituitary neurosurgery. , 2010, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[11]  Kuniaki Saito,et al.  Effectiveness of suturing training with 10-0 nylon under fixed and maximum magnification (x 20) using desk type microscope. , 2006, Surgical neurology.

[12]  M. Grady,et al.  Comparison of endoscopic and microscopic removal of pituitary adenomas: single-surgeon experience and the learning curve. , 2008, Neurosurgical focus.

[13]  João Flávio Nogueira,et al.  Building a Real Endoscopic Sinus and Skull-Base Surgery Simulator , 2008, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[14]  Bulent Duz,et al.  Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: analysis of complications in the authors' initial 800 patients. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery.