From Babies to Robots: The Contribution of Developmental Robotics to Developmental Psychology

The latest developments in AI and machine learning, and the parallel advances in robotics, have very recently contributed to a shift in the approach to modeling human intelligence. These innovations, accompanied by the new emphasis on embodied and grounded cognition in AI and psychology, have led to the establishment of the field of Developmental Robotics. This is the interdisciplinary approach, built on the close collaboration of the disciplines of cognitive robotics and child psychology, to the autonomous design of behavioral and cognitive capabilities in artificial cognitive agents, such as robots, which takes direct inspiration from the developmental principles and mechanisms observed in children. We illustrate the benefits of this approach by presenting a detailed baby robot case study of the role of embodiment during early word learning, as well as an overview of several developmental robotics model of perceptual, social and language development. Introduction Computational models of cognition have significantly contributed to the definition, testing, and validation of psychology and neuroscience theories, including developmental psychology. Such computational approaches, ranging from symbolic rule-based systems, connectionist neural networks, and Bayesian models, have typically resulted from scientific and technological developments in artificial intelligence (AI) and its attempt to reproduce and simulate the uniqueness and complexity of human-like adult symbolic intelligence. However, since the origins of AI, there have been proposals to study the full spectrum of child development, rather than adult-like intelligence. This is for example what Alan Turing proposed in 1950: “Instead of trying to produce a programme to simulate the adult mind, why not rather try to produce one which simulates the child’s? If this were then subjected to an appropriate course of education one would obtain the adult brain.” Turing (1, page 440). The latest developments in AI and machine learning, and the parallel advances in robotics, have contributed to a shift in the approach to modeling human intelligence. These innovations have been accompanied by an increased emphasis on embodied and grounded cognition in AI (2) and psychology (3,4). This has permitted the first attempts to realize Turing’s vision, i.e. the idea that an embodied agent (e.g. robot), using a set of intrinsic motivation principles regulating the real-time interaction between its body, brain and environment, can autonomously acquire and develop an increasingly This is the author's accepted manuscript. The final published version of this work is published by John Wiley in Child Development Perspectives available at DOI 10.1111/cdep.12282. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher's policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. complex set of sensorimotor and mental capabilities, grounded in the interaction with its

[1]  David Klahr,et al.  An information processing analysis of some piagetian experimental tasks , 1970 .

[2]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[3]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[4]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[5]  T. Kohonen Self-organized formation of topographically correct feature maps , 1982 .

[6]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On learning the past-tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[8]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Elephants don't play chess , 1990, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[9]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[10]  G. Butterworth The ontogeny and phylogeny of joint visual attention. , 1991 .

[11]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  ROBOTS AS SOCIAL ACTORS: AURORA AND THE CASE OF AUTISM , 1999 .

[12]  Minoru Asada,et al.  Cognitive developmental robotics as a new paradigm for the design of humanoid robots , 2001, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[13]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Autonomous Mental Development by Robots and Animals , 2001, Science.

[14]  A. Pentland,et al.  Artificial intelligence. Autonomous mental development by robots and animals. , 2001, Science.

[15]  Minoru Asada,et al.  A constructive model for the development of joint attention , 2003, Connect. Sci..

[16]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  Developmental robotics: a survey , 2003, Connect. Sci..

[17]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  Merrill Harmin,et al.  Inspiring active learning : a complete handbook for today's teachers , 2006 .

[19]  Minoru Asada,et al.  Learning for joint attention helped by functional development , 2006, Adv. Robotics.

[20]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Learning by selection: visual search and object perception in young infants. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[21]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Simulating Infants' Gaze Patterns during the Development of Perceptual Completion , 2007 .

[22]  L. Barsalou Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Epigenetic Robotics Architecture (ERA) , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.

[24]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  The iCub humanoid robot: An open-systems platform for research in cognitive development , 2010, Neural Networks.

[25]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Grounding Word Learning in Space , 2011, PloS one.

[26]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Modeling U Shaped Performance Curves in Ongoing Development , 2011, CogSci.

[27]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Mapping the Landscape of Human-Level Artificial General Intelligence , 2012, AI Mag..

[28]  B. Scassellati,et al.  Robots for use in autism research. , 2012, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[29]  Tomoaki Nakamura,et al.  Long-term learning of concept and word by robots: Interactive learning framework and preliminary results , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[30]  Yiannis Demiris,et al.  A Humanoid Robot Companion for Wheelchair Users , 2013, ICSR.

[31]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Computational Grounded Cognition: a new alliance between grounded cognition and computational modeling , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[32]  Fabio Tesser,et al.  Multimodal child-robot interaction: building social bonds , 2013, HRI 2013.

[33]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  Two routes to actorhood: lexicalized potency to act and identification of the actor role , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[34]  A. Cangelosi,et al.  Developmental Robotics: From Babies to Robots , 2015 .

[35]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  A review: Can robots reshape K-12 STEM education? , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO).

[36]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Posture Affects How Robots and Infants Map Words to Objects , 2015, PloS one.

[37]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  A Cognitive Neural Architecture Able to Learn and Communicate through Natural Language , 2015, PloS one.

[38]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Children’s referent selection and word learning:insights from a developmental robotic system , 2016 .

[39]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Why Are There Developmental Stages in Language Learning? A Developmental Robotics Model of Language Development. , 2017, Cognitive science.

[40]  Kathryn E. Merrick,et al.  Value systems for developmental cognitive robotics: A survey , 2017, Cognitive Systems Research.

[41]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  What do we learn about development from baby robots? , 2015, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.