Emergy evaluations of three aquaculture systems on wetlands surrounding the Pearl River Estuary, China

Emergy and economic analysis, accompanied by sensitivity analysis, were used to evaluate the ecological economic characteristics of three fish aquaculture systems on wetlands surrounding the Pearl River Estuary in China. The sustainability of these systems was compared to two aquaculture systems and two wetland systems, to provide reference conditions for the best use of limited wetland areas. We found that the three systems studied had similar emergy characteristics, despite their very different economic characteristics. Counter intuitively, the high economic input and output mode did not have higher environmental impact or lower sustainability compared with low economic input and output mode. Apparently, the sustainability of an intensive aquaculture system is determined mainly by how many natural renewable resources are exploited. The large differences in economic benefit and environmental impacts between the mangrove reserve and the aquaculture systems demonstrated the important role of nature reserves on preserving the sustainability of an estuary. Transformity (TR) and Emergy Yield Ratio (EYR) are both indicators of system efficiency, but from different points of view, and they produced opposite results in assessing the efficiency of the same system in this study. The ratio of EYR to TR might be used in addition to the EYR and transformity as a discreet perspective on overall system production efficiency.

[1]  Lei Li,et al.  New emergy indices for sustainable development. , 2003, Journal of environmental sciences.

[2]  Mark T. Brown,et al.  Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation , 1997 .

[3]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Emergy analysis for the environmental sustainability of an inshore fish farming system , 2007 .

[4]  H. Odum,et al.  Self-Organization, Transformity, and Information , 1988, Science.

[5]  P. Qin,et al.  Emergy evaluation of Mai Po mangrove marshes , 2000 .

[6]  Odum,et al.  Modeling for All Scales: An Introduction to System Simulation , 2000 .

[7]  刘新茂,et al.  Energy Flow and Emergy Analysis of the Agroecosystems of China , 1998 .

[8]  N. Polunin.  Ecosystem Theory and Application , 1986 .

[9]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Emergy Evaluation of Salmon Pen Culture , 2001 .

[10]  M. Cuadra,et al.  Assessment of economic and ecological carrying capacity of agricultural crops in Nicaragua , 2007 .

[11]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making , 1995 .

[12]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Emergy evaluation and the management of systems towards sustainability: A response to Sholto Maud , 2007 .

[13]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Emergy assessment of integrated production systems of grains, pig and fish in small farms in the South Brazil , 2006 .

[14]  Stewart A.W. Diemont,et al.  Emergy evaluation of the performance and sustainability of three agricultural systems with different scales and management , 2006 .

[15]  Elisabeth C. Odum.  Emergy analysis of shrimp mariculture in Ecuador: a review , 2004 .

[16]  Jie Chen,et al.  Conservation and economic viability of nature reserves: An emergy evaluation of the Yancheng Biosphere Reserve , 2007 .

[17]  Charles A. S. Hall,et al.  Maximum power : the ideas and applications of H.T. Odum , 1996 .

[18]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Emergy Analysis and Environmental Accounting , 2004 .

[19]  Hai Ren,et al.  Emergy and economic evaluations of four fruit production systems on reclaimed wetlands surrounding the Pearl River Estuary, China , 2009 .

[20]  H. Odum.  Ecological and general systems : an introduction to systems ecology , 1994 .