Nonsmooth analysis of the impact between successive skew bridge-segments

Skew bridges with in-deck joints belong to the most common types of existing bridges worldwide. Empirical evidence from past earthquakes indicates that such, multi-segment, skew bridges often rotate in the horizontal plane, increasing the chances of deck unseating. The present paper studies the oblique in-deck impact between successive bridge segments, which triggers this peculiar rotation mechanism. The analysis employs a nonsmooth rigid body approach and utilizes set-valued force laws. A key feature of this approach is the linear complementarity problem (LCP) which encapsulates all physically feasible post-impact states. The LCP results in pertinent closed-form solutions which capture each of these states, and clarifies the conditions under which each post-impact state appears. In this context, a rational method to avoid the singularities arising from dependent constraints is coined. The results confirm theoretically the observed tendency of skew (bridge deck) segments to bind in their obtuse corners and rotate in such a way that the skew angle increases. Further, the study offers equations which describe the contact kinematics between two adjacent skew planar rigid bodies. The same equations can be used to treat successively as many pairs of skew bridge-segments as necessary.

[1]  B. Brogliato Nonsmooth Mechanics: Models, Dynamics and Control , 1999 .

[2]  Gokhan Pekcan,et al.  Seismic response of skewed RC box-girder bridges , 2008 .

[3]  Alp Caner,et al.  Improved Seismic Response of Multisimple-Span Skewed Bridges Retrofitted with Link Slabs , 2009 .

[4]  Gakuho Watanabe,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF CABLE-RESTRAINER FOR MITIGATING ROTATION OF A SKEWED BRIDGE SUBJECTED TO STRONG GROUND SHAKING , 2001 .

[5]  Elias G. Dimitrakopoulos,et al.  Analysis of a frictional oblique impact observed in skew bridges , 2010 .

[6]  G. Stavroulakis Multibody Dynamics with Unilateral Contacts by Friedrich Pfeiffer and Christoph Glocker, Wiley, New York, 1996 , 1998 .

[7]  Alexandros A. Taflanidis,et al.  Optimal probabilistic design of seismic dampers for the protection of isolated bridges against near-fault seismic excitations , 2011 .

[8]  Mohsen Amjadian,et al.  An approximate method for dynamic analysis of skewed highway bridges with continuous rigid deck , 2010 .

[9]  Christoph Glocker,et al.  Oblique Frictional Impact of a Bar: Analysis and Comparison of Different Impact Laws , 2005 .

[10]  Gupta,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF HIGHLY SKEWED P/C I-GIRDER BRIDGE. TECHNICAL NOTE , 2001 .

[11]  P. D. Panagiotopoulos,et al.  Dynamic and incremental variational inequality principles, differential inclusions and their applications to co-existent phases problems , 1981 .

[12]  Andrew Scanlon,et al.  Skewed concrete box girder bridge static and dynamic testing and analysis , 2012 .

[13]  Hua Zhang,et al.  EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF A SKEW BRIDGE IN WENCHUAN 2008 EARTHQUAKE , 2012 .

[14]  Farzin Zareian,et al.  Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete bridges with skew-angled seat-type abutments , 2012 .

[15]  Friedrich Pfeiffer,et al.  Multibody Dynamics with Unilateral Contacts , 1996 .

[16]  Shervin Maleki Seismic Modeling of Skewed Bridges with Elastomeric Bearings and Side Retainers , 2005 .

[17]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Effects of Pounding and Skewness on Seismic Responses of Typical Multispan Highway Bridges Using the Fragility Function Method , 2013 .

[18]  Emmanuel A. Maragakis,et al.  Analytical models for the rigid body motions of skew bridges , 1987 .

[19]  James Michael LaFave,et al.  Seismic vulnerability assessment of wall pier supported highway bridges using nonlinear pushover analyses , 2005 .

[20]  C. Glocker,et al.  Application of the nonsmooth dynamics approach to model and analysis of the contact-impact events in cam-follower systems , 2012 .

[21]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Dimensional Analysis of the Earthquake Response of a Pounding Oscillator , 2010 .

[22]  David J. Wagg,et al.  13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering , 2004 .

[23]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Dimensional analysis of the earthquake-induced pounding between inelastic structures , 2011 .

[24]  Elias G. Dimitrakopoulos Seismic response analysis of skew bridges with pounding deck–abutment joints , 2011 .

[25]  M. Ala Saadeghvaziri,et al.  Seismic behavior and capacity/demand analyses of three multi-span simply supported bridges , 2008 .

[26]  C. Glocker Set-valued force laws , 2001 .

[27]  Paul C. Jennings,et al.  Engineering features of the San Fernando earthquake of February 9, 1971 , 1971 .

[28]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Dimensional analysis of the earthquake‐induced pounding between adjacent structures , 2009 .

[29]  A. Lovett,et al.  Research Institute. , 2006, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[30]  G. Stavroulakis,et al.  Nonconvex Optimization in Mechanics: Algorithms, Heuristics and Engineering Applications , 1997 .

[31]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  The Maule (Chile) earthquake of February 27, 2010: Development of hazard, site specific ground motions and back-analysis of structures , 2012 .

[32]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges , 1996 .

[33]  Eric M. Lui,et al.  Torsional effects on short-span highway bridges , 2000 .

[34]  Kazuhiko Kawashima,et al.  Effect of Nonlinear Seismic Torsion on the Performance of Skewed Bridge Piers , 2008 .