Pedagogy for Addressing the Worldview Challenge in Sustainable Development of Agriculture

Agriculture is offering new forms of support to society, as evidenced by rapid development of an agricultural "bio-economy," and increasing emphasis on production of ecological services in farmed landscapes. The advent of these innovations will engage agricultural professionals in critical civic debates about matters that are complex and that will often be controversial, and thus demand new sets of professional capacities that extend significantly beyond technical expertise. Specifically, agriculturalists will need a capacity to facilitating challenges to, and where appropriate, changes in prevailing worldviews--their own as well as those of others. In this article we report on pedagogy that aims to build such capacity, via a semester-length course on critical engagement in sustainable development of agricultural and other managed ecosystems. In the course we aimed to help prepare students to engage as professionals in critical discourse under circumstances where prevailing worldviews about agricultural development vary significantly among different stakeholders. We used experiential learning to encourage students to critically examine individual and collective worldviews and "mental models" relevant to sustainable development challenges. Experiential learning was particularly featured in an extended exercise in "scenario planning," a method of systemic analysis of alternative scenarios of future development in which the students began to function as a critical learning system. In reflective and evaluative essays, students indicated favorable evaluations of their learning experience and provided evidence of increased capacities highly relevant to civic professionalism within the context of the quest for sustainability as agriculture offers new forms of life support to society.

[1]  William M. Sullivan,et al.  Work and integrity : the crisis and promise of professionalism in America , 1995 .

[2]  C. Folke.  RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES , 2006 .

[3]  S. Stagl.  Theoretical foundations of learning processes for sustainable development , 2007 .

[4]  D. Yankelovich,et al.  Coming to public judgment : making democracy work in a complex world , 1992 .

[5]  H. Maturana,et al.  The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding , 2007 .

[6]  S. Daniels,et al.  Working Through Environmental Conflict: The Collaborative Learning Approach , 2001 .

[7]  Nicholas R. Jordan,et al.  New Concepts in Agroecology: A Service-Learning Course. , 2005 .

[8]  L. Milbrath,et al.  Envisioning a sustainable society : learning our way out , 1989 .

[9]  J. Pretty.  Social Capital and the Collective Management of Resources , 2003, Science.

[10]  P Sandoe,et al.  Staying good while playing god--the ethics of breeding farm animals. , 1999, Animal welfare.

[11]  Karen Strohm Kitchner.  Cognition, Metacognition, and Epistemic Cognition , 1983 .

[12]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[13]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Network Power in Collaborative Planning , 2000 .

[14]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/casp.774 Processes of Social Learning in Integrated Resources Management , 2022 .

[15]  Marcia Salner.  Adult cognitive and epistemological development in systems education , 1986 .

[16]  E. Barham,et al.  Civil society and agricultural sustainability , 1998 .

[17]  R. J. Salvador,et al.  Agroecology: The Ecology of Food Systems , 2003 .

[18]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The implications of complexity for integrated resources management , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[19]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Scenario Planning: a Tool for Conservation in an Uncertain World , 2003, Conservation Biology.

[20]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking , 2007 .

[21]  Keith Douglass Warner,et al.  Sustainable Development of the Agricultural Bio-Economy , 2007, Science.

[22]  R. Bawden,et al.  Knowing Systems and the Environment , 2007 .

[23]  Keith Douglass Warner,et al.  Extending agroecology: Grower participation in partnerships is key to social learning , 2006, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

[24]  L. B. Delind.  Place, work, and civic agriculture: Common fields for cultivation , 2002 .

[25]  Pier Paolo Roggero,et al.  Combining social learning with agro-ecological research practice for more effective management of nitrate pollution , 2007 .

[26]  Peter Schwartz,et al.  The art of the long view , 1991 .

[27]  R. Bawden,et al.  LEARNING TO PERSIST A Systemic View of Development , 1997 .

[28]  Jeffrey L. Gunsolus,et al.  Public scholarship—linking weed science with public work , 2002, Weed Science.

[29]  Frank A. Fear,et al.  Coming to Critical Engagement: An Autoethnographic Exploration , 2006 .

[30]  N. Röling,et al.  Ecological Knowledge System , 1996 .