Non-Brownian dynamics and strategy of amoeboid cell locomotion.

Amoeboid cells such as Dictyostelium discoideum and Madin-Darby canine kidney cells show the non-Brownian dynamics of migration characterized by the superdiffusive increase of mean-squared displacement. In order to elucidate the physical mechanism of this non-Brownian dynamics, a computational model is developed which highlights a group of inhibitory molecules for actin polymerization. Based on this model, we propose a hypothesis that inhibitory molecules are sent backward in the moving cell to accumulate at the rear of cell. The accumulated inhibitory molecules at the rear further promote cell locomotion to form a slow positive feedback loop of the whole-cell scale. The persistent straightforward migration is stabilized with this feedback mechanism, but the fluctuation in the distribution of inhibitory molecules and the cell shape deformation concurrently interrupt the persistent motion to turn the cell into a new direction. A sequence of switching behaviors between persistent motions and random turns gives rise to the superdiffusive migration in the absence of the external guidance signal. In the complex environment with obstacles, this combined process of persistent motions and random turns drives the simulated amoebae to solve the maze problem in a highly efficient way, which suggests the biological advantage for cells to bear the non-Brownian dynamics.

[1]  J. Cooper,et al.  Control of actin assembly and disassembly at filament ends. , 2000, Current opinion in cell biology.

[2]  Amit Pathak,et al.  Biophysical regulation of tumor cell invasion: moving beyond matrix stiffness. , 2011, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[3]  Hiroaki Takagi,et al.  Functional Analysis of Spontaneous Cell Movement under Different Physiological Conditions , 2008, PloS one.

[4]  Mehmet Toner,et al.  Directional decisions during neutrophil chemotaxis inside bifurcating channels. , 2010, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[5]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Myosin II contributes to cell-scale actin network treadmilling via network disassembly , 2010, Nature.

[6]  A. Levchenko,et al.  Models of eukaryotic gradient sensing: application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[7]  Pascale G. Charest,et al.  Feedback signaling controls leading-edge formation during chemotaxis. , 2006, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[8]  L. Smilenov,et al.  Focal adhesion motility revealed in stationary fibroblasts. , 1999, Science.

[9]  A. Berger,et al.  MHC class II transport at a glance , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[10]  Masaki Sasai,et al.  Cortical Factor Feedback Model for Cellular Locomotion and Cytofission , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  Julie A. Theriot,et al.  An Adhesion-Dependent Switch between Mechanisms That Determine Motile Cell Shape , 2011, PLoS biology.

[12]  Jean-Jacques Meister,et al.  Comparative Dynamics of Retrograde Actin Flow and Focal Adhesions: Formation of Nascent Adhesions Triggers Transition from Fast to Slow Flow , 2008, PloS one.

[13]  Marc Herant,et al.  Form and function in cell motility: from fibroblasts to keratocytes. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[14]  J. White,et al.  Cortical flow in animal cells. , 1988, Science.

[15]  W. Rappel,et al.  Directional sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis: a balanced inactivation model. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Peter Friedl,et al.  Amoeboid leukocyte crawling through extracellular matrix: lessons from the Dictyostelium paradigm of cell movement , 2001, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[17]  Van Haastert Sensory adaptation of Dictyostelium discoideum cells to chemotactic signals , 1983, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  Ericka Stricklin-Parker,et al.  Ann , 2005 .

[19]  Christopher V. Rao,et al.  A Mathematical Model for Neutrophil Gradient Sensing and Polarization , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  R. Preuss,et al.  Anomalous dynamics of cell migration , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Thomas D Pollard,et al.  Cellular Motility Driven by Assembly and Disassembly of Actin Filaments , 2003, Cell.

[22]  Eshel Ben-Jacob,et al.  Activated Membrane Patches Guide Chemotactic Cell Motility , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Tracking retrograde flow in keratocytes: news from the front. , 2005, Molecular biology of the cell.

[24]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Polarization and Movement of Keratocytes: A Multiscale Modelling Approach , 2006, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[25]  S. Yamada,et al.  Myosin IIA dependent retrograde flow drives 3D cell migration. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[26]  Y. Fukui MECHANISTICS OF AMOEBOID LOCOMOTION: SIGNAL TO FORCES , 2002, Cell biology international.

[27]  J. Small,et al.  The comings and goings of actin: coupling protrusion and retraction in cell motility. , 2005, Current opinion in cell biology.

[28]  W. Choi,et al.  Zigzag Turning Preference of Freely Crawling Cells , 2011, PloS one.

[29]  Julie A. Theriot,et al.  Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells , 2008, Nature.

[30]  M. Gaestel,et al.  A requirement of MAPKAPK2 in the uropod localization of PTEN during FMLP-induced neutrophil chemotaxis. , 2004, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications - BBRC.

[31]  Pablo A Iglesias,et al.  Chemoattractant signaling in dictyostelium discoideum. , 2004, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[32]  A. Coniglio,et al.  Diffusion-limited phase separation in eukaryotic chemotaxis. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  P. Sperryn,et al.  Blood. , 1989, British journal of sports medicine.

[34]  Kazuo Sutoh,et al.  Keratocyte-like locomotion in amiB-null Dictyostelium cells. , 2004, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[35]  P. Vallotton,et al.  Simultaneous mapping of filamentous actin flow and turnover in migrating cells by quantitative fluorescent speckle microscopy. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Peter Friedl,et al.  Amoeboid shape change and contact guidance: T-lymphocyte crawling through fibrillar collagen is independent of matrix remodeling by MMPs and other proteases. , 2003, Blood.

[37]  Deborah Wessels,et al.  PTEN plays a role in the suppression of lateral pseudopod formation during Dictyostelium motility and chemotaxis , 2007, Journal of Cell Science.

[38]  Y. Yanagawa,et al.  Random Walk Behavior of Migrating Cortical Interneurons in the Marginal Zone: Time-Lapse Analysis in Flat-Mount Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  John A. Mackenzie,et al.  Chemotaxis: A Feedback-Based Computational Model Robustly Predicts Multiple Aspects of Real Cell Behaviour , 2011, PLoS biology.

[40]  Masaki Sasai,et al.  Inertia of amoebic cell locomotion as an emergent collective property of the cellular dynamics. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[41]  E. Ben-Jacob,et al.  “Self-Assisted” Amoeboid Navigation in Complex Environments , 2011, PloS one.

[42]  Masaki Sasai,et al.  Modulation of the reaction rate of regulating protein induces large morphological and motional change of amoebic cell. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[43]  D. Knecht,et al.  Actin binding domains direct actin-binding proteins to different cytoskeletal locations , 2008, BMC Cell Biology.

[44]  D. Soll,et al.  Targeted disruption of the ABP-120 gene leads to cells with altered motility , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[45]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Neutrophil chemotaxis in linear and complex gradients of interleukin-8 formed in a microfabricated device , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[46]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[47]  P. Parseval,et al.  Structure of the { 001 } talc surface as seen by atomic force 1 microscopy : Comparison with X-ray and electron diffraction 2 results 3 4 , 2006 .

[48]  H. Benink,et al.  Analysis of cortical flow models in vivo. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[49]  M. Steinmetz,et al.  Cortexillins, Major Determinants of Cell Shape and Size, Are Actin-Bundling Proteins with a Parallel Coiled-Coil Tail , 1996, Cell.