Stage 4S Neuroblastoma

Stage 4S neuroblastoma (4SNB) is associated with spontaneous tumor regression and an excellent prognosis. However, a small group of the patients have a poor prognosis. One hundred eighty-five stage 4SNB cases filed at the Children’s Oncology Group Neuroblastoma Pathology Reference Laboratory were studied. MYCN oncogene status [non-amplified (NA) vs. Amplified (A)] determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization, MYC-family (MYCN/MYC) protein expression [no-overexpression(−)/(+/−) vs. overexpression(+)] by immunohistochemistry and histopathology by International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification [Favorable Histology (FH) vs. Unfavorable Histology (UH)] with particular attention to nucleolar hypertrophy [NH(−) vs. (+)] were assessed with patient survival. One hundred forty-seven (79.5%) tumors were MYCN-NA, FH, MYC-family protein(−)/(+/−), and NH(−) with a good prognosis [88.5±3.1% 3-y event-free survival (EFS); 94.1±2.3% 3-y overall survival (OS)]. Among MYCN-NA tumors, 11 demonstrated MYCN protein(+) with a moderate and uniform (M/U) staining pattern: they were FH(10/11), NH(−), 1 showed MYC protein(+) simultaneously, and all patients are alive. Also found were 5 MYC protein(+) and MYCN(−)/(+/−) tumors; they were FH without NH (4/5), and all patients are alive. Among MYCN-A tumors, 18 had MYCN protein(+) with a strong and heterogeneous (S/H) staining pattern, 9 had UH (44.4±23.4% EFS/OS) and 9 had FH (68.6±19.2% EFS/OS), and 15 showed NH(+). Two tumors had MYCN protein(−)/(+/−) despite MYCN-A; both were FH and NH(−), and 1 patient died. S/H staining pattern of MYCN protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry was associated with MYCN amplification, NH(+) and a poor prognosis. In contrast, the M/U staining pattern was associated with MYCN nonamplification and NH(−), and had no adverse prognostic effects for the stage 4SNB patients.

[1]  A. Naranjo,et al.  Defining Risk Factors for Chemotherapeutic Intervention in Infants With Stage 4S Neuroblastoma: A Report From Children's Oncology Group Study ANBL0531. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  J. Maris,et al.  Rare MYC-amplified Neuroblastoma With Large Cell Histology , 2018, Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society.

[3]  G. Brodeur Spontaneous regression of neuroblastoma , 2018, Cell and Tissue Research.

[4]  A. Look,et al.  MYC-family protein overexpression and prominent nucleolar formation represent prognostic indicators and potential therapeutic targets for aggressive high-MKI neuroblastomas: a report from the children’s oncology group , 2017, Oncotarget.

[5]  A. Look,et al.  Augmented expression of MYC and/or MYCN protein defines highly aggressive MYC-driven neuroblastoma: a Children's Oncology Group study , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  H. Beltran The N-myc Oncogene: Maximizing its Targets, Regulation, and Therapeutic Potential , 2014, Molecular Cancer Research.

[7]  A. Look,et al.  Neuroblastoma of undifferentiated subtype, prognostic significance of prominent nucleolar formation, and MYC/MYCN protein expression: A report from the Children's Oncology Group , 2013, Cancer.

[8]  C. Dang MYC, metabolism, cell growth, and tumorigenesis. , 2013, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine.

[9]  A. Look,et al.  Peripheral neuroblastic tumors with genotype–phenotype discordance: A report from the Children's Oncology Group and the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Committee , 2013, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[10]  Jan Koster,et al.  Functional MYCN signature predicts outcome of neuroblastoma irrespective of MYCN amplification , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  R. Stallings,et al.  LIN28B induces neuroblastoma and enhances MYCN levels via let-7 suppression , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[12]  S. Monti,et al.  Immunohistochemical Detection of MYC-driven Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  J Khan,et al.  International consensus for neuroblastoma molecular diagnostics: report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Biology Committee , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  R. Beijersbergen,et al.  Stabilization of N-Myc is a critical function of Aurora A in human neuroblastoma. , 2009, Cancer cell.

[15]  F. Méchinaud,et al.  Treatment of stage 4s neuroblastoma – report of 10 years' experience of the French Society of Paediatric Oncology (SFOP) , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  Hiroyuki Shimada,et al.  Morphologic features of neuroblastoma (Schwannian stroma‐poor tumors) in clinically favorable and unfavorable groups , 2002, Cancer.

[17]  D. Stram,et al.  Favorable biology and outcome of stage IV-S neuroblastoma with supportive care or minimal therapy: a Children's Cancer Group study. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  Hiroyuki Shimada,et al.  Terminology and morphologic criteria of neuroblastic tumors , 1999, Cancer.

[19]  K K Matthay,et al.  The International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (the Shimada system) , 1999, Cancer.

[20]  K. Matthay Stage 4S neuroblastoma: what makes it special? , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  A. Look,et al.  Prognostic significance of age, MYCN oncogene amplification, tumor cell ploidy, and histology in 110 infants with stage D(S) neuroblastoma: the pediatric oncology group experience--a pediatric oncology group study. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Max M. van Noesel,et al.  Neuroblastoma 4S , 1997, Cancer.

[23]  A. Evans,et al.  Hepatomegaly in neuroblastoma stage 4s: criteria for treatment of the vulnerable neonate. , 1996, Medical and pediatric oncology.

[24]  J. Hata,et al.  Stage IVS neuroblastoma: a clinical, histological, and biological analysis of 45 cases. , 1996, Human pathology.

[25]  F. Berthold,et al.  Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging and response to treatment. , 1993, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[26]  P. Bruzzi,et al.  Disseminated neuroblastoma (stage IV and IV‐S) in the first year of life. Outcome related to age and stage , 1992, Cancer.

[27]  C. R. Pinkerton,et al.  International criteria for diagnosis, staging and response to treatment in patients with neuroblastoma. , 1988, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[28]  K. Matthay,et al.  Complete pathologic maturation and regression of stage ivs neuroblastoma without treatment , 1988, Cancer.

[29]  R. Kennett,et al.  Identification and characterization of the NMYC gene product in human neuroblastoma cells by monoclonal antibodies with defined specificities. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  B. A. Cook,et al.  The prognostic significance of age and pattern of metastases in stage IV‐S neuroblastoma , 1986, Cancer.

[31]  M. Pike,et al.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples. , 1977, British Journal of Cancer.

[32]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .