Combination of noninvasive neurovascular imaging modalities in stroke patients: patterns of use and impact on need for digital subtraction angiography.

BACKGROUND The diagnostic work-up of acute stroke relies on the use of proper imaging studies. We sought to determine the use of a combination of 2 noninvasive tests, namely magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in diagnosing vascular lesions and the necessity for a subsequent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for the definitive diagnosis. METHODS Patients admitted to 2 comprehensive stroke centers between January 2008 and July 2010 who had an equivocal initial noninvasive test were reviewed. The proportions of patients who underwent CTA and MRA in combination and those who required additional DSA for definitive diagnosis were determined. The diagnostic yield and impact on management in patients with CTA and MRA combination was compared with patients who underwent CTA and MRA followed by DSA. RESULTS Among a total of 1063 patients (mean age ± SD 63 ± 16), 384 (36%) underwent >1 vascular imaging study. There was no difference in the rates of cardiovascular risk factors and stroke subtype between different combination groups. The agreement between CTA and MRA was high (concordance 81%). Among the 164 patients who underwent both CTA and MRA, a DSA was required for resolution/confirmation in only 27 (16%) patients. Among these 27, DSA findings changed the clinical decision-making in 22 (82%) patients (11 stenotic severities and 11 diagnoses of arteriovenous fistula, aneurysm, or dissection). CONCLUSIONS In our experience, a combination of CTA and MRA was frequently used in patients in whom the initial noninvasive imaging was determined insufficient. The combination of findings from CTA and MRA were considered adequate in a large portion of patients resulting in a lower requirement for DSA and higher treatment impact from DSA.

[1]  William Hollingworth,et al.  Cost‐effectiveness of diagnostic strategies prior to carotid endarterectomy , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[2]  E. Larsson,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography , 2002, Neuroradiology.

[3]  Philippe Gailloud,et al.  LIMITATIONS OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSMS , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[4]  A. Divani,et al.  Changes in Cost and Outcome Among US Patients With Stroke Hospitalized in 1990 to 1991 and Those Hospitalized in 2000 to 2001 , 2007, Stroke.

[5]  D. Newell,et al.  Cerebral Aneurysms , 2019, Definitions.

[6]  S. Warach,et al.  Recommendations for imaging of acute ischemic stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. , 2009, Stroke.

[7]  M. Oudkerk,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography in the selection of patients suitable for neurosurgical intervention of ruptured intracranial aneurysms , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[8]  A. Molyneux International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[9]  S. A. Gutnikov,et al.  Reanalysis of the Final Results of the European Carotid Surgery Trial , 2003, Stroke.

[10]  Timo Krings,et al.  Radiologic assessment of brain arteriovenous malformations: what clinicians need to know. , 2010, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[11]  J. Fandino,et al.  High-resolution three-dimensional 3 T magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of experimental aneurysm in the rabbit , 2009, Neurological Research.

[12]  V. Janardhan,et al.  The Value of Computed Tomography Angiography in Determining Treatment Allocation for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage , 2008, Neurocritical care.

[13]  Peter Sandercock,et al.  For Personal Use. Only Reproduce with Permission from the Lancet Publishing Group , 2022 .

[14]  Gary Friday,et al.  2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guideline , 2011, Circulation.

[15]  J. Halperin,et al.  2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guideline , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  K. Lakshminarayan,et al.  Thrombolytic treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke related to underlying arterial dissection in the United States. , 2011, Archives of neurology.

[17]  Isabelle Jars,et al.  Concordance Rate Differences of 3 Noninvasive Imaging Techniques to Measure Carotid Stenosis in Clinical Routine Practice: Results of the CARMEDAS Multicenter Study , 2004, Stroke.