Fatores que afetam as características produtivas e reprodutivas de fêmeas suínas

This review collect information related to various factors that affect the productive and reproductive characteristics of sows, with the purpose of get information to assist and promote the maximization of reproductive performance of sows. The swine production is one of the most advanced areas of the livestock sector, especially by their high increase, efficiency and competitiveness and, in the last decades, the sows passed by an enormous increment in their capacity to produce piglets, accompanied by profound physiological changes, behavioral and consequently management production. Currently, the genetic selection of sows and the crossing prioritizes characteristics related to increase productivity, aiming use the best available races, in conjunction with genetic improvement by selection and crossbreeding systems, are the principal means to improve reproductive and productive efficiency of sows. With the advent of new technologies developed in modern swine production, the genetic improvement programs have advanced substantially in order to contribute to greater productive and reproductive efficiency of pigs, but also for industry profitability. However, continuous research in the area should be carried out in order to maximize the productivity of female and reduce the economic losses.

[1]  M. Elzo,et al.  Genetic and environmental factors affecting weaning-to-first service interval in a landrace-large white swine population in Northern Thailand. , 2009 .

[2]  G. Shurson,et al.  Lactational and subsequent reproductive responses of lactating sows to dietary lysine (protein) concentration. , 2000, Journal of animal science.

[3]  M. Bernardi,et al.  Factors associated with return to estrus in first service swine females. , 2009, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[4]  L. Rydhmer Genetics of sow reproduction, including puberty, oestrus, pregnancy, farrowing and lactation , 2000 .

[5]  K. Dzama,et al.  Genetic determination of mothering ability and piglet growth in indigenous Mukota sows of Zimbabwe , 2008 .

[6]  L Canario,et al.  Between-breed variability of stillbirth and its relationship with sow and piglet characteristics. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[7]  Fernando Pandolfo Bortolozzo,et al.  Estratégias ao desmame das primíparas para um bom desempenho subseqüente , 2007 .

[8]  M. Chimonyo Evaluation of the Production and Genetic Potential of Indigenous Mukota and their Crosses with Large White Pigs in Zimbabwe. , 2012 .

[9]  L. G. Albuquerque,et al.  Resposta à Seleção para Características de Desempenho em um Rebanho de Seleção de Suínos , 2001 .

[10]  W. Marsh,et al.  Estimation of lifetime productivity of female swine. , 1999, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[11]  P. H. Rolfs,et al.  Estudo da divergência genética entre linhas de suínos utilizando técnicas de análise multivariada , 2000 .

[12]  Nathalie Quiniou,et al.  Variation of piglets’ birth weight and consequences on subsequent performance , 2002 .

[13]  M. Elzo,et al.  Estimation of Genetic Parameters and Trends for Weaning-to-first Service Interval and Litter Traits in a Commercial Landrace-Large White Swine Population in Northern Thailand , 2010 .

[14]  G. Dulac,et al.  Towards the Control of Emerging Bluetongue Disease , 1993 .

[15]  R. Fonseca,et al.  Estudo da divergencia genetica entre as racas suinas Duroc, Landrace e Large White, utilizando tecnicas de analise multivariada , 2002 .

[16]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Molecular approaches to improved pig fertility. , 2020, Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement.

[17]  W. Marsh,et al.  Influence of imposed feed intake patterns during lactation on reproductive performance and on circulating levels of glucose, insulin, and luteinizing hormone in primiparous sows. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[18]  M. Diekman,et al.  Effects of lactation length and an exogenous progesterone and estradiol-17beta regimen during embryo attachment on endogenous steroid concentrations and embryo survival in sows. , 2002, Theriogenology.

[19]  B Kemp,et al.  Effects of time of insemination relative to ovulation, as determined by ultrasonography, on fertilization rate and accessory sperm count in sows. , 1995, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[20]  M. Sevón-Aimonen,et al.  Genetic associations of prolificacy with performance, carcass, meat quality, and leg conformation traits in the Finnish Landrace and Large White pig populations. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[21]  W. Flowers,et al.  Factors affecting temporal relationships between estrus and ovulation in commercial sow farms. , 2004, Animal reproduction science.

[22]  Ford Sp Embryonic and fetal development in different genotypes in pigs. , 2020, Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement.

[23]  A. Valros,et al.  Reproductive endocrinology and postweaning performance in the multiparous sow. Part 2. Influence of nursing behavior. , 2002, Theriogenology.

[24]  L. Rydhmer,et al.  Genetic parameters for reproduction and production traits of Landrace sows in Thailand. , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[25]  Y. Koketsu,et al.  Longevity, lifetime pig production and productivity, and age at first conception in a cohort of gilts observed over six years on commercial farms. , 1999, The Journal of veterinary medical science.

[26]  E. Tholen,et al.  The genetic foundation of fitness and reproduction traits in Australian pig populations. 2. Relationships between weaning to conception interval, farrowing interval, stayability, and other common reproduction and production traits. , 1996 .

[27]  Guosheng Su,et al.  Aggressive behaviour of sows at mixing and maternal behaviour are heritable and genetically correlated traits , 2005 .

[28]  E. Poleze,et al.  Consequences of variation in weaning-to-estrus interval on reproductive performance of swine females , 2006 .

[29]  S. Meding,et al.  Fertility of long-term-stored boar semen: Influence of extender (Androhep and Kiev), storage time and plasma droplets in the semen , 1994 .

[30]  L. A. den Hartog,et al.  The effect of the weaning to oestrus interval on litter size, live born piglets and farrowing rate in sows , 1994 .

[31]  K. Koehler,et al.  Genetic parameters and trends for litter traits in U.S. Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace pigs. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[32]  Y. Koketsu Within-farm variability in age structure of breeding-female pigs and reproductive performance on commercial swine breeding farms. , 2005, Theriogenology.

[33]  R. Filho,et al.  Desempenho reprodutivo de vacas Nelore no Norte e Nordeste do Brasil , 2006 .

[34]  D. Lay,et al.  Preweaning survival in swine , 2002 .

[35]  M. Wilson,et al.  Development of Meishan and Yorkshire littermate conceptuses in either a Meishan or Yorkshire uterine environment to day 90 of gestation and to term. , 1998, Biology of reproduction.

[36]  Fernando Pandolfo Bortolozzo,et al.  Reflexo do período de lactação na produtividade de porcas primíparas e multíparas , 2018, Acta Scientiae Veterinariae.

[37]  A. L. do Amaral,et al.  Boas práticas de produção de suínos. , 2006 .

[38]  M. Bernardi,et al.  Body reserve mobilization during lactation in first parity sows and its effect on second litter size , 2010 .

[39]  G D Dial,et al.  Factors influencing the postweaning reproductive performance of sows on commercial farms. , 1997, Theriogenology.