Systematic and Random Method Effects . Estimating Method Bias and Method Variance

Two lines of research have been followed to assess the effect of the method of measurement on data quality. Split-ballot experiments allowed researchers to assess the effect of the measurement method on the marginal distribution of the responses and to make assessments of relative bias. Structural equation models allowed researchers to assess the effect of the method on reliability and validity. This paper develops and illustrates a strategy based on fitting mean-andcovariance structure models to multitrait-multimethod data, which allows researchers to assess relative bias, reliability and validity simultaneously. Two major advantages of this approach over split-ballot designs are that relative bias is assessed after partialling out the effects of measurement errors and that alternative definitions of relative bias are possible. A complete sequence of statistical tests of relative unbiasedness of methods is provided and applied.

[1]  J. Conley Asking questions: A practical guide to questionnaire design , 1983 .

[2]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  The Reliability of Survey Attitude Measurement , 1991 .

[3]  Hubert M. Blalock,et al.  Estimating Measurement Error Using Multiple Indicators and Several Points in Time , 1970 .

[4]  A. C. Scherpenzeel A Question of Quality. Evaluating survey questions by multitrait-multimethod studies , 1995 .

[5]  W. Saris,et al.  Stability of Three-Wave Simplex Estimates of Reliability. , 1999 .

[6]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Estimation Problems in the Block-Diagonal Model of the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix , 1990 .

[7]  Willem E. Saris,et al.  A comparative Study of Satisfaction with Life in Europe , 1996 .

[8]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Survey Errors and Survey Costs , 1990 .

[9]  Neal Schmitt,et al.  Methodology Review: Analysis of Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices , 1986 .

[10]  W. R. Dillon,et al.  An Integrative Look at the Use of Additive and Multiplicative Covariance Structure Models in the Analysis of MTMM Data , 1992 .

[11]  F. M. Andrews Construct Validity and Error Components of Survey Measures: A Structural Modeling Approach , 1984 .

[12]  Willem E. Saris,et al.  Evaluation of Measurement Instruments Using a Structural Modeling Approach , 2011 .

[13]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Analysis of the multitrait^multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis , 1992 .

[14]  D. Sörbom A GENERAL METHOD FOR STUDYING DIFFERENCES IN FACTOR MEANS AND FACTOR STRUCTURE BETWEEN GROUPS , 1974 .

[15]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications , 1988 .

[16]  D. R. Heise Separating reliability and stability in test-retest correlation. , 1969 .

[17]  D. Alwin Approaches to the Interpretation of Relationships in the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix , 1973 .

[18]  Andreas Ritter,et al.  Structural Equations With Latent Variables , 2016 .

[19]  Albert Satorra,et al.  Asymptotic robust inferences in the analysis of mean and covariance structures , 1992 .

[20]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  An empirical application of confirmatory factor analysis to the multitrait-multimethod matrix , 1976 .

[21]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices in Consumer Research , 1991 .

[22]  Frank Diederich Response Behaviour In The Survey Interview , 2016 .

[23]  Jaak Billiet,et al.  Het survey-interview onderzocht. Effecten van het ontwerp en gebruik van vragenlijsten op de kwaliteit van de antwoorden , 1984 .

[24]  H. Marsh Confirmatory Factor Analyses of Multitrait-Multimethod Data: Many Problems and a Few Solutions , 1989 .

[25]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality , 1976 .

[26]  Robert L. Linn,et al.  Path analysis: Psychological examples. , 1970 .