Detecting a Vector Based on Linear Measurements

We consider a situation where the state of a system is represented by a real-valued vector. Under normal circumstances, the vector is zero, while an event manifests as non-zero entries in this vector, possibly few. Our interest is in the design of algorithms that can reliably detect events (i.e., test whether the vector is zero or not) with the least amount of information. We place ourselves in a situation, now common in the signal processing literature, where information about the vector comes in the form of noisy linear measurements. We derive information bounds in an active learning setup and exhibit some simple near-optimal algorithms. In particular, our results show that the task of detection within this setting is at once much easier, simpler and different than the tasks of estimation and support recovery.

[1]  Xiaoming Huo,et al.  Near-optimal detection of geometric objects by fast multiscale methods , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[2]  Zhu Han,et al.  Sparse event detection in wireless sensor networks using compressive sensing , 2009, 2009 43rd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[3]  Ting Sun,et al.  Single-pixel imaging via compressive sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[4]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Sparse Signal Detection from Incoherent Projections , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings.

[5]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Compressive distilled sensing: Sparse recovery using adaptivity in compressive measurements , 2009, 2009 Conference Record of the Forty-Third Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[6]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Distilled sensing: selective sampling for sparse signal recovery , 2009, AISTATS.

[7]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Compressive Sampling for Signal Detection , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP '07.

[8]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  E. Candès,et al.  Global testing under sparse alternatives: ANOVA, multiple comparisons and the higher criticism , 2010, 1007.1434.

[10]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[11]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Finding needles in noisy haystacks , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[12]  D. Donoho,et al.  Higher criticism for detecting sparse heterogeneous mixtures , 2004, math/0410072.

[13]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  On the Fundamental Limits of Adaptive Sensing , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[14]  Yu. I. Ingster,et al.  Nonparametric Goodness-of-Fit Testing Under Gaussian Models , 2002 .

[15]  Yu. I. Ingster,et al.  Detection boundary in sparse regression , 2010, 1009.1706.