Adaptive flexibility of the within-hand attentional gradient in touch: An MEG study

&NA; Previous studies have demonstrated the cortical mechanisms for the gradient of spatial attention in vision and audition, whereas those for touch have yet to be elucidated in detail. In order to examine the within‐hand gradient of tactile spatial attention in the cerebral cortex, we used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to record cortical responses to an electrocutaneous stimulation presented randomly to any of the five fingers of the right hand at a random interstimulus interval (750–1250 ms). Participants attended to the index finger, ring finger, or both to detect a rare target stimulus in a sequence of frequent standard stimuli presented to the attended finger(s) by silent counting. Neuromagnetic responses around the contralateral primary and secondary somatosensory cortices (SIc and SIIc) at 50–70 ms and 80–100 ms, respectively, for the stimulation of the index or ring finger were stronger when that finger was attended than when the distant finger was attended or at rest. The amplitude of the SIIc response was also intermediate when the index and ring fingers were simultaneously attended. The SIIc response to the task‐irrelevant stimulation of the thumb or little finger increased when the index or ring finger was attended, respectively, suggesting an across‐finger gradient of tactile attention. Simultaneous attention to the index and ring fingers decreased the SIIc response to the task‐irrelevant stimulation of the intervening middle finger more than that with attention to either one of the two fingers. The earliest attentional sign was observed for the SI M40c response, with the amplitude increasing with the stimulation of the unattended finger. Furthermore, late responses in the temporo‐parietal junction (TPJ) and prefrontal cortex (PFC) were stronger with the stimulation of the unattended finger than with that of the attended finger. Thus, the present study provides cortical evidence for the adaptive control of the within‐hand, across‐finger gradient of tactile attention that depends on whether attention is focused on a single finger or divided into non‐adjacent different fingers.

[1]  D. LaBerge Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  A Pfefferbaum,et al.  The distribution of attention across auditory input channels: an assessment using the human evoked potential. , 1978, Psychophysiology.

[3]  Ralph Huonker,et al.  Reduction of somatosensory evoked fields in the primary somatosensory cortex in a one-back task , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  G. Shulman,et al.  Gradients of spatial attention. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[5]  Hiroki Nakata,et al.  Differential modulation of temporal and frontal components of the somatosensory N140 and the effect of interstimulus interval in a selective attention task. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in an auditory discrimination task. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  John W. Lane,et al.  Receptive Field Properties of the Macaque Second Somatosensory Cortex: Representation of Orientation on Different Finger Pads , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  A. Kok Event-related-potential (ERP) reflections of mental resource̊s: a review and synthesis , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[9]  Hiroshi Shibasaki,et al.  Second somatosensory area (SII) plays a significant role in selective somatosensory attention. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  J C Craig,et al.  Perceptual processing of adjacent and nonadjacent tactile nontargets , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  O. Witte,et al.  Task requirements change signal strength of the primary somatosensory M50: Oddball vs. one-back tasks. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[12]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The spatial distribution of attentional selectivity in touch: evidence from somatosensory ERP components , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Covert attention in touch: behavioral and ERP evidence for costs and benefits. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[14]  S Lakatos,et al.  Time—distance relations in shifting attention between locations on one’s body , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Effects of interstimulus interval on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs): a hypothesis concerning SEF generation at the primary sensorimotor cortex. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  Emi Tanaka,et al.  Common cortical responses evoked by appearance, disappearance and change of the human face , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[17]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Spatial attention to central and peripheral auditory stimuli as indexed by event-related potentials. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[18]  Y. Hamada,et al.  Effect of interstimulus interval on attentional modulation of cortical activities in human somatosensory areas , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  R Näätänen,et al.  Brain mechanism of selective listening reflected by event-related potentials. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  D. Woods,et al.  Signal clustering modulates auditory cortical activity in humans , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Eero Pekkonen,et al.  Modulation of somatosensory evoked fields from SI and SII by acute GABAA-agonism and paired-pulse stimulation , 2008, NeuroImage.

[22]  M Eimer,et al.  Attentional selection and attentional gradients: an alternative method for studying transient visual-spatial attention. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[23]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Common Anatomical and External Coding for Hands and Feet in Tactile Attention: Evidence from Event-related Potentials , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Sensory incongruence leading to hand disownership modulates somatosensory cortical processing , 2014, Cortex.

[25]  John W. Lane,et al.  Receptive Field Properties of the Macaque Second Somatosensory Cortex: Evidence for Multiple Functional Representations , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  D. Somers,et al.  Multiple Spotlights of Attentional Selection in Human Visual Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[27]  B. Röder,et al.  Action goal selection and motor planning can be dissociated by tool use , 2008, Cognition.

[28]  J C Craig,et al.  Attending to two fingers: Two hands are better than one , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Larry E. Roberts,et al.  Functional Organization of Primary Somatosensory Cortex Depends on the Focus of Attention , 2002, NeuroImage.

[30]  D Robertson,et al.  Differential enhancement of early and late components of the cerebral somatosensory evoked potentials during forced‐paced cognitive tasks in man , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  J. Sarvas Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  M. Eimer,et al.  Links between eye movement preparation and the attentional processing of tactile events: An event-related brain potential study , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[33]  C. Wickens,et al.  Applied Attention Theory , 2007 .

[34]  S. Kameyama,et al.  Inhibitory effect of intensity and interstimulus interval of conditioning stimuli on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields , 2016, The European journal of neuroscience.

[35]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Spatial deployment of attention within and across hemifields in an auditory task , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Neural dynamics of attending and ignoring in human auditory cortex , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  Sufen Chen,et al.  Rejection positivity predicts trial-to-trial reaction times in an auditory selective attention task: a computational analysis of inhibitory control , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[38]  T. Kida,et al.  Dual-task repetition alters event-related brain potentials and task performance , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[39]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Load effects in auditory selective attention: Evidence for distinct facilitation and inhibition mechanisms , 2010, NeuroImage.

[40]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Temporal dynamics of lateralized ERP components elicited during endogenous attentional shifts to relevant tactile events. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[41]  Leena Lauronen,et al.  Spatial dynamics of population activities at S1 after median and ulnar nerve stimulation revisited: An MEG study , 2006, NeuroImage.

[42]  J L Lancaster,et al.  Automated Talairach Atlas labels for functional brain mapping , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[43]  S. Hillyard,et al.  The gradient of spatial auditory attention in free field: An event-related potential study , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  Massimiliano Valeriani,et al.  The effects of aging on selective attention to touch: a reduced inhibitory control in elderly subjects? , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[45]  S. Hillyard,et al.  The division of attention and the human auditory evoked potential , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  Christopher D Wickens,et al.  Processing Resources in Attention, Dual Task Performance, and Workload Assessment. , 1981 .

[47]  Ralph Huonker,et al.  Modality-independent reduction mechanisms of primary sensory evoked fields in a one-back task , 2016, NeuroImage.

[48]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Visuotactile learning and body representation: An erp study with rubber hands and rubber objects , 2008 .

[49]  Jon Driver,et al.  Cross-Modal Interactions between Audition, Touch, and Vision in Endogenous Spatial Attention: ERP Evidence on Preparatory States and Sensory Modulations , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  R. Parasuraman,et al.  Auditory evoked potentials and divided attention. , 1978, Psychophysiology.

[51]  John W. Lane,et al.  Receptive Field (RF) Properties of the Macaque Second Somatosensory Cortex: RF Size, Shape, and Somatotopic Organization , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Audiovisual Integration of Letters in the Human Brain , 2000, Neuron.

[53]  F Mauguière,et al.  Activation of a distributed somatosensory cortical network in the human brain: a dipole modelling study of magnetic fields evoked by median nerve stimulation. Part II: Effects of stimulus rate, attention and stimulus detection. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[54]  Gijsbertus Mulder,et al.  An electrophysiological investigation of the spatial distribution of attention to colored stimuli in focused and divided attention conditions , 1989, Biological Psychology.

[55]  Franck-Emmanuel Roux,et al.  Functional architecture of the somatosensory homunculus detected by electrostimulation , 2017, The Journal of physiology.

[56]  S A Hillyard,et al.  Spatial gradients of visual attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[57]  Hiroshi Shibasaki,et al.  Attention modulates both primary and second somatosensory cortical activities in humans: a magnetoencephalographic study. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  J. Huttunen,et al.  Intracortical modulation of somatosensory evoked fields during movement: Evidence for selective suppression of postsynaptic inhibition , 2012, Brain Research.

[59]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Dynamics of within-, inter-, and cross-modal attentional modulation. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[60]  T. Kida,et al.  Modulation of somatosensory processing in dual tasks: an event-related brain potential study , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[61]  Ernst Niebur,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective attention in the somatosensory system. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[62]  Emi Tanaka,et al.  Time-varying cortical activations related to visual-tactile cross-modal links in spatial selective attention. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[63]  J C Craig,et al.  The effect of spatial orientation on the perception of moving tactile stimuli , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[64]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: An electrophysiological analysis , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[65]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[66]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attentional modulation of orientation perception in somatosensation , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[67]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The attentional selection of spatial and non-spatial attributes in touch: ERP evidence for parallel and independent processes , 2004, Biological Psychology.

[68]  Hiroki Nakata,et al.  Centrifugal regulation of task-relevant somatosensory signals to trigger a voluntary movement , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[69]  J. Huttunen In search of augmentation at human SI: Somatosensory cortical responses to stimulus trains and their modulation by motor activity , 2010, Brain Research.

[70]  T. Wasaka,et al.  Resource allocation and somatosensory P300 amplitude during dual task: effects of tracking speed and predictability of tracking direction , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[71]  S. Kameyama,et al.  Effect of Changes in Stimulus Site on Activation of the Posterior Parietal Cortex , 2015, Brain Topography.

[72]  F. Mauguière,et al.  Somatosensory responses during selective spatial attention: The N120‐to‐N140 trasition , 1995 .

[73]  Emi Tanaka,et al.  Change-driven cortical activation in multisensory environments: An MEG study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[74]  G. Shulman,et al.  Spatial determinants of the distribution of attention , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[75]  Koji Inui,et al.  Centrifugal regulation of human cortical responses to a task-relevant somatosensory signal triggering voluntary movement , 2006, NeuroImage.

[76]  Y. Tong,et al.  The duality of selection: excitatory and inhibitory processes in auditory selective attention. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[77]  Hiroki Nakata,et al.  Passive enhancement of the somatosensory P100 and N140 in an active attention task using deviant alone condition , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[78]  S. Kameyama,et al.  Effect of the number of pins and inter-pin distance on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following mechanical tactile stimulation , 2013, Brain Research.

[79]  Olaf Blanke,et al.  Human finger somatotopy in areas 3b, 1, and 2: A 7T fMRI study using a natural stimulus , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[80]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[81]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[82]  Y. Tong,et al.  Control of working memory: Effects of attention training on target recognition and distractor salience in an auditory selection task , 2012, Brain Research.

[83]  F. Mauguière,et al.  Mapping study of somatosensory evoked potentials during selective spatial attention. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[84]  P Berg,et al.  Magnetic source imaging of tactile input shows task‐independent attention effects in SII , 2000, Neuroreport.