Physics-Constrained Robustness Evaluation of Intelligent Security Assessment for Power Systems

Machine learning (ML) algorithms have been widely developed to enable real-time security assessment for large-scale electricity grids. However, it also has been extensively recognized that the ML models are vulnerable to adversarial examples, which are slightly perturbed instances that can mislead the classifications but cannot be distinguished by human eyes. Considering the adversarial examples against the ML-based security assessment, they must not only cause misclassification but also follow the power balance and transfer limits and bypass the bad data detection. To this end, this paper proposes a novel concept named physics-constrained robustness that aims to computing a lower-bound of adversarial perturbations, evaluating the vulnerability of the ML-based intelligent security assessment (ISA) for power systems. A general optimization problem is formulated to compute the physics-constrained robustness of ISA with the mislabeling, power balance, power limitation, and invisible constraints. The analytical results and comparing relationship of ISA’s robustness with different constraints are provided. By using the static security assessment as an example, we provide explicit formulations to evaluate the physics-constrained robustness of. Finally, extensive experiments are conducted to evaluate the physics-constrained robustness of ISA in static and dynamic cases with the real-world load profiles from New York State and provide suggestions to select the ML models and parameters.

[1]  Spyros Chatzivasileiadis,et al.  Physics-Informed Neural Networks for AC Optimal Power Flow , 2021, Electric Power Systems Research.

[2]  Georgios S. Misyris,et al.  Transient Stability Analysis with Physics-Informed Neural Networks , 2021, ArXiv.

[3]  David K. Y. Yau,et al.  Zero-Parameter-Information Data Integrity Attacks and Countermeasures in IoT-Based Smart Grid , 2021, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[4]  Yan Zheng,et al.  Vulnerability Assessment of Deep Reinforcement Learning Models for Power System Topology Optimization , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[5]  Michael Chertkov,et al.  Physics-Informed Graphical Neural Network for Parameter & State Estimations in Power Systems , 2021, ArXiv.

[6]  Goran Strbac,et al.  A Confidence-Aware Machine Learning Framework for Dynamic Security Assessment , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Adnan M. Abu-Mahfouz,et al.  A Review of Machine Learning Approaches to Power System Security and Stability , 2020, IEEE Access.

[8]  Zuyi Li,et al.  Dummy Data Attacks in Power Systems , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[9]  Yan Xu,et al.  Transfer Learning-Based Power System Online Dynamic Security Assessment: Using One Model to Assess Many Unlearned Faults , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  G. S. Misyris,et al.  Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Power Systems , 2019, 2020 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM).

[11]  Spyros Chatzivasileiadis,et al.  Verification of Neural Network Behaviour: Formal Guarantees for Power System Applications , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[12]  Goran Strbac,et al.  A Deep Learning-Based Feature Extraction Framework for System Security Assessment , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[13]  Cho-Jui Hsieh,et al.  Robustness Verification of Tree-based Models , 2019, NeurIPS.

[14]  Qusay A. Al-Gburi,et al.  Dynamic Security Assessment for Power System Under Cyber-Attack , 2019, Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology.

[15]  Paris Perdikaris,et al.  Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations , 2019, J. Comput. Phys..

[16]  Rong Yan,et al.  Fast Transient Stability Batch Assessment Using Cascaded Convolutional Neural Networks , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Weiming Xiang,et al.  Verification for Machine Learning, Autonomy, and Neural Networks Survey , 2018, ArXiv.

[18]  Deepjyoti Deka,et al.  Is Machine Learning in Power Systems Vulnerable? , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm).

[19]  Benjamin Edwards,et al.  Adversarial Robustness Toolbox v0.2.2 , 2018, ArXiv.

[20]  Robert Eriksson,et al.  Efficient Database Generation for Data-Driven Security Assessment of Power Systems , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  Lamine Mili,et al.  A Generalized False Data Injection Attacks Against Power System Nonlinear State Estimator and Countermeasures , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[22]  Zhao Yang Dong,et al.  The 2015 Ukraine Blackout: Implications for False Data Injection Attacks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[23]  M. Pawlak,et al.  Prediction of the Transient Stability Boundary Based on Nonparametric Additive Modeling , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[24]  Dinesh Rangana Gurusinghe,et al.  Post-Disturbance Transient Stability Status Prediction Using Synchrophasor Measurements , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[25]  David A. Wagner,et al.  Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks , 2016, 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP).

[26]  Patrick D. McDaniel,et al.  Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samples , 2016, ArXiv.

[27]  Bo Wang,et al.  Power System Transient Stability Assessment Based on Big Data and the Core Vector Machine , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[28]  Seyed-Mohsen Moosavi-Dezfooli,et al.  DeepFool: A Simple and Accurate Method to Fool Deep Neural Networks , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[29]  J. Doug Tygar,et al.  Evasion and Hardening of Tree Ensemble Classifiers , 2015, ICML.

[30]  S. Brunton,et al.  Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Miao He,et al.  Robust Online Dynamic Security Assessment Using Adaptive Ensemble Decision-Tree Learning , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[32]  U. D. Annakkage,et al.  Support Vector Machine-Based Algorithm for Post-Fault Transient Stability Status Prediction Using Synchronized Measurements , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[33]  Zhao Yang Dong,et al.  Intelligent systems for power system dynamic security assessment: Review and classification , 2011, 2011 4th International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies (DRPT).

[34]  Peng Ning,et al.  False data injection attacks against state estimation in electric power grids , 2009, CCS.

[35]  Shie Mannor,et al.  Robustness and Regularization of Support Vector Machines , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[36]  B. Pal,et al.  Robust Control in Power Systems , 2005 .

[37]  Dejan J. Sobajic,et al.  Artificial Neural-Net Based Dynamic Security Assessment for Electric Power Systems , 1989, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[38]  A. Wills,et al.  Physics-informed machine learning , 2021, Nature Reviews Physics.