Evidence amalgamation, plausibility, and cancer research
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Rui Chen,et al. Promise of personalized omics to precision medicine , 2013, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.
[2] H. Boushey,et al. Asthmatics with exacerbation during acute respiratory illness exhibit unique transcriptional signatures within the nasal mucosa , 2014, Genome Medicine.
[3] G. Longo,et al. In search of principles for a Theory of Organisms , 2015, Journal of Biosciences.
[4] Robert S. Cohen,et al. On Scientific Discovery , 1981 .
[5] John Worrall,et al. Why There's No Cause to Randomize , 2007, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[6] D. Vaux. Response to “The tissue organization field theory of cancer: A testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory” DOI: 10.1002/bies.201100025 , 2011, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.
[7] Steven A. Roberts,et al. Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes , 2013 .
[8] Wesley C. Salmon,et al. The Appraisal of Theories: Kuhn Meets Bayes , 1990, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.
[9] P. Stanford. Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives , 2006 .
[10] Marta Bertolaso,et al. Philosophy of Cancer , 2016 .
[11] Hilary Putnam,et al. Mathematics, Matter and Method: Philosophical Papers , 1979 .
[12] Mirela Rigo-Lemini,et al. Epistemic States of Convincement. A Conceptualization from the Practice of Mathematicians and Neurobiology , 2017 .
[13] Jing Zhang,et al. Identifying driver mutations from sequencing data of heterogeneous tumors in the era of personalized genome sequencing , 2014, Briefings Bioinform..
[14] S. Rosenfeld. Are the Somatic Mutation and Tissue Organization Field Theories of Carcinogenesis Incompatible? , 2013, Cancer informatics.
[15] Alessandro Giuliani,et al. Biological uncertainty , 2008, Theory in Biosciences.
[16] Stefan M Willems,et al. Tumor heterogeneity and personalized cancer medicine: are we being outnumbered? , 2014, Future oncology.
[17] D. Gillies. Philosophical Theories of Probability , 2000 .
[18] P. Laplace. A Philosophical Essay On Probabilities , 1902 .
[19] M. Eisen,et al. Gene expression informatics —it's all in your mine , 1999, Nature Genetics.
[20] Cristian S. Calude,et al. Classical, quantum and biological randomness as relative unpredictability , 2015, Natural Computing.
[21] C. Sonnenschein,et al. The tissue organization field theory of cancer: A testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory , 2011, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.
[22] C. Sonnenschein,et al. Carcinogenesis explained within the context of a theory of organisms. , 2016, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.
[23] A. Gelman,et al. Beyond subjective and objective in statistics , 2015, 1508.05453.
[24] P. D. Magnus,et al. What’s New about the New Induction? , 2004, Synthese.
[25] S. Baker. Recognizing paradigm instability in theories of carcinogenesis. , 2014 .
[26] Samuel Ruhmkorff. Some Difficulties for the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives , 2011, Philosophy of Science.
[27] S. Greenland,et al. Uncertainty in Clinical Medicine , 2011 .
[28] Herbert A. Simon,et al. Scientific discovery , 1993, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[29] Carlo Cellucci,et al. Rethinking Logic: Logic in Relation to Mathematics, Evolution, and Method , 2013 .
[30] Jan-Willem Romeijn. Philosophy of Statistics , 2014 .
[31] Jon Williamson,et al. In Defence of Objective Bayesianism , 2010 .
[32] John L. Pollock,et al. Epistemology and probability , 1983, Synthese.
[33] G. Polya,et al. Heuristic Reasoning and the Theory of Probability , 1941 .
[34] Re: a cancer theory kerfuffle can lead to new lines of research. , 2015, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[35] R. Weinberg. Coming Full Circle—From Endless Complexity to Simplicity and Back Again , 2014, Cell.
[36] H. Putnam. Mathematics, Matter, And Method , 1975 .
[37] S. Psillos,et al. Grasping At Realist Straws , 2009 .
[38] S. Ruphy,et al. SMT or TOFT? How the Two Main Theories of Carcinogenesis are Made (Artificially) Incompatible , 2015, Acta biotheoretica.
[39] Volker Heun,et al. Bioinformatics advances biology and medicine by turning big data troves into knowledge , 2017, Informatik-Spektrum.
[40] I. Tannock,et al. Limits to Personalized Cancer Medicine. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.
[41] J. Worrall. Evidence in Medicine and Evidence‐Based Medicine , 2007 .
[42] S. Shostak. Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science , 2013 .
[43] Asoke K. Talukder,et al. Genomics 3.0: Big-data in Precision Medicine , 2015, BDA.
[44] E. Dougherty,et al. Big data need big theory too , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[45] M. Bizzarri,et al. SMT and TOFT: Why and How They are Opposite and Incompatible Paradigms , 2016, Acta biotheoretica.
[46] Giuseppe Longo,et al. The Biological Consequences of the Computational World: Mathematical Reflections on Cancer Biology , 2017, 1701.08085.
[47] S. Goodman. Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics. 1: The P Value Fallacy , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[48] K. Kinzler,et al. Evaluating the evaluation of cancer driver genes , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[49] H. D. De Kanter. [The philosophy of statistics]. , 1972, Ginecología y Obstetricia de México.
[50] David Papineau,et al. The Virtues of Randomization , 1994, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[51] J. Schupbach. STUDIES IN THE LOGIC OF EXPLANATORY POWER , 2011 .
[52] Peter Urbach,et al. Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach , 1989 .
[53] Lawrence B. Sklar. DO UNBORN HYPOTHESES HAVE RIGHTS , 1981 .
[54] Alla Katsnelson,et al. Momentum grows to make 'personalized' medicine more 'precise' , 2013, Nature Medicine.
[55] Niko Beerenwinkel,et al. Computational approaches for the identification of cancer genes and pathways , 2016, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.
[56] Finnur Dellsén. Scientific progress: Knowledge versus understanding. , 2016, Studies in history and philosophy of science.
[57] Carlo Cellucci,et al. Models of Science and Models in Science , 2016 .
[58] P. Kyle Stanford,et al. Exceeding Our Grasp , 2006 .
[59] Hallam Stevens,et al. Life Out of Sequence: A Data-Driven History of Bioinformatics , 2013 .
[60] M. Stratton,et al. The cancer genome , 2009, Nature.
[61] S. Goodman,et al. Of P-values and Bayes: a modest proposal. , 2001, Epidemiology.
[62] Vladimir A. Kuznetsov,et al. Big genomics and clinical data analytics strategies for precision cancer prognosis , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[63] Fulvio Mazzocchi,et al. Could Big Data be the end of theory in science? , 2015, EMBO reports.
[64] G. Halliday,et al. Inhibitor treatment of peripheral mononuclear cells from Parkinson’s disease patients further validates LRRK2 dephosphorylation as a pharmacodynamic biomarker , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[65] Carlo Cellucci,et al. The Heuristic View , 2017 .
[66] Benjamin J. Raphael,et al. Identifying driver mutations in sequenced cancer genomes: computational approaches to enable precision medicine , 2014, Genome Medicine.
[67] Alan Musgrave,et al. Popper and Hypothetico-deductivism , 2011, Inductive Logic.
[68] Cristian Claude,et al. Information and Randomness: An Algorithmic Perspective , 1994 .
[69] Emiliano Ippoliti,et al. Models and Inferences in Science , 2016 .
[70] James F. Allen,et al. In silico veritas , 2001, EMBO reports.
[71] D. Vaux,et al. In defense of the somatic mutation theory of cancer , 2011, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.
[72] K. Popper,et al. The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1960 .
[73] Darrell P. Rowbottom,et al. Extending the argument from unconceived alternatives: observations, models, predictions, explanations, methods, instruments, experiments, and values , 2019, Synthese.
[74] Malcolm R. Forster,et al. Philosophy of Statistics: An Introduction , 2011 .
[75] S. Baker. A cancer theory kerfuffle can lead to new lines of research. , 2014, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[76] David Teira. Frequentist versus Bayesian Clinical Trials , 2011 .
[77] J. Worrall. Evidence: philosophy of science meets medicine. , 2010, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.
[78] Philosophy of Cancer. A Dynamic and Relational View. , 2017, Anticancer research.
[79] Charles Anderson,et al. The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete , 2008 .
[80] Han Liu,et al. Challenges of Big Data Analysis. , 2013, National science review.
[81] Van Fraassen,et al. Laws and symmetry , 1989 .
[82] Immanuel Kant,et al. Lectures on Logic , 1992 .
[83] Andrey Alexeyenko,et al. Distinguishing between driver and passenger mutations in individual cancer genomes by network enrichment analysis , 2014, BMC Bioinformatics.
[84] Stuart G. Baker,et al. The questionable premises underlying the search for cancer driver mutations and cancer susceptibility genes , 2017 .
[85] B. Bedessem,et al. SMT and TOFT Integrable After All: A Reply to Bizzarri and Cucina , 2017, Acta biotheoretica.
[86] Moti Mizrahi. Historical Inductions, Unconceived Alternatives, and Unconceived Objections , 2016 .
[87] Alexander Bird,et al. Systematicity, knowledge, and bias. How systematicity made clinical medicine a science , 2017, Synthese.
[88] Cristian S. Calude,et al. The Deluge of Spurious Correlations in Big Data , 2016, Foundations of Science.
[89] C. Sonnenschein,et al. Response to “In defense of the somatic mutation theory of cancer” DOI: 10.1002/bies.201100022 , 2011, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.
[90] R. Bluhm,et al. Evidence-based medicine , 2011 .
[91] The Problem of Unconceived Objections , 2014 .