Attentional control and the relatedness proportion effect in semantic priming.

In 2 experiments, participants completed both an attentional control battery (OSPAN, antisaccade, and Stroop tasks) and a modified semantic priming task. The priming task measured relatedness proportion (RP) effects within subjects, with the color of the prime indicating the probability that the to-be-named target would be related. In Experiment 2, participants were cued before each trial with the probability of a related target. Stimulus onset asynchronies traditionally thought to tap automatic processing (267 ms) versus controlled processing (1,240 ms) were used. Across experiments, principal component analysis on the battery revealed a general attentional control component. Moreover, the RP effect increased linearly with attentional control in both experiments. It is concluded that RP effects produced in this paradigm depend purely upon the effortful process of expectancy generation, which renders them sensitive to individual differences in attentional control.

[1]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Does the proportion of associatively related pairs modulate the associative priming effect at very brief stimulus-onset asynchronies? , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[2]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[3]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Capacity demands of automatic processes in semantic priming , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[5]  M. Gazzaniga.  The cognitive neurosciences, 3rd edition , 2004 .

[6]  P. Tibbetts.  :Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind , 2009 .

[7]  D. Balota,et al.  Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  Anthony D. Wagner,et al.  Cognitive Control, Semantic Memory, and Priming: Contributions from Prefrontal Cortex. , 2004 .

[9]  C. Price,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of the Semantic System: Divisible by What? , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Obligatory role of the LIFG in synonym generation: evidence from PET and cortical stimulation , 1997, Neuroreport.

[11]  A. Nobre,et al.  The anatomy and time course of semantic priming investigated by fMRI and ERPs , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[14]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior Technical Report No. 8006. , 1980 .

[15]  D. Balota,et al.  Depth of Automatic Spreading Activation: Mediated Priming Effects in Pronunciation but Not in Lexical Decision , 1986 .

[16]  James H. Neely,et al.  When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition. , 1995 .

[17]  K. Heyer,et al.  On the nature of the proportion effect in semantic priming , 1985 .

[18]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[19]  M. Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition , 1995 .

[20]  Cynthia P. May,et al.  Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. , 1999 .

[21]  K. Fukushima,et al.  Voluntary control of saccadic eye movement in patients with frontal cortical lesions and Parkinsonian patients in comparison with that in Schizophrenics , 1994, Biological Psychiatry.

[22]  Sharon L. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Dissociating semantic and phonological maintenance using fMRI , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[23]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[24]  J. Driver,et al.  Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII , 2000 .

[25]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[26]  C. A. Becker.  Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[27]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  On the Control of Control: The Role of Dopamine in Regulating Prefrontal Function and Working Memory , 2007 .

[28]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[29]  Jesse J. Bengson,et al.  Variability in response criteria affects estimates of conscious identification and unconscious semantic priming , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[30]  T. Carr,et al.  Implications of measures of reliability for theories of priming: Activity in semantic memory is inherently noisy and uncoordinated , 2005 .

[31]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  The role of prefrontal regions in the Stroop task , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Semantic priming in the pronunciation task: The role of prospective prime-generated expectancies , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[33]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[34]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[35]  Keith A Hutchison,et al.  Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  R. Engle,et al.  The role of working memory capacity in retrieval. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  Keith A Hutchison,et al.  With great expectations, can two "wrongs" prime a "right"? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  P. T. Fox,et al.  Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing , 1988, Nature.

[40]  R. Davidson,et al.  Consciousness and Self-Regulation: Advances in Research and Theory IV , 1976 .

[41]  D. Balota,et al.  Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[43]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Interaction of prime repetition with visual degradation: Is priming a retrieval phenomenon? , 1990 .

[44]  A. D. Groot,et al.  Primed Lexical Decision: Combined Effects of the Proportion of Related Prime-Target Pairs and the Stimulus-Onset Asynchrony of Prime and Target , 1984 .

[45]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Working Memory Capacity , 2005 .

[46]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Predicting semantic priming at the item level , 2008 .

[47]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  An Event-Related Brain Potential Analysis of Visual Word Priming Effects , 2000, Brain and Language.

[49]  D. Besner,et al.  Levels of representation in visual word recognition: a dissociation between morphological and semantic processing. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  Charles D. Smith,et al.  Dissociation of Automatic and Strategic Lexical-Semantics: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence for Differing Roles of Multiple Frontotemporal Regions , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  R. Engle,et al.  The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[52]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Working memory capacity, indirect semantic priming, and stroop interference: pattern of interindividual prefrontal performance differences in healthy volunteers. , 2005, Neuropsychology.

[53]  D. Balota,et al.  Automatic and attentional priming in young and older adults: reevaluation of the two-process model. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  R W Schvaneveldt,et al.  Semantic-context effects on word recognition: Influence of varying the proportion of items presented in an appropriate context , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[55]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  A functional account of age differences in memory , 2016 .

[56]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Brain activation during automatic and controlled processing of semantic relations: a priming experiment using lexical-decision , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[57]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination , 1994 .

[58]  S. Dornič,et al.  Attention and performance V , 1976 .

[59]  D. Deacon,et al.  Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[60]  Gary L. Dannenbring,et al.  Strategic factors in a lexical-decision task: Evidence for automatic and attention-driven processes , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[61]  R. Martin.  Components of Short-Term Memory and Their Relation to Language Processing , 2005 .

[62]  L. Hasher,et al.  Automatic and effortful processes in memory. , 1979 .

[63]  Jeanette Altarriba,et al.  Depth of spreading activation revisited: Semantic mediated priming occurs in lexical decisions , 1988 .

[64]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[65]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[66]  C. Burgess,et al.  Mediated priming in high-dimensional semantic space: No effect of direct semantic relationships or co-occurrence. , 1998 .

[67]  D. Balota,et al.  Conceptualizing control in social cognition: how executive functioning modulates the expression of automatic stereotyping. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[68]  M. Mintun,et al.  Positron emission tomography study of voluntary saccadic eye movements and spatial working memory. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[69]  Derek Besner,et al.  Role of set in visual word recognition: Activation and activation blocking as nonautomatic processes. , 1996 .

[70]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Time course of conscious and unconscious semantic brain activation , 2000, Neuroreport.

[71]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[72]  J. Henry,et al.  A meta-analytic review of verbal fluency performance following focal cortical lesions. , 2004, Neuropsychology.

[73]  A. Benton,et al.  Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology , 1981 .

[74]  D. Gopher,et al.  Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application. , 1999 .

[75]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[76]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[77]  T. Shallice,et al.  Dual-Process Model in Semantic Priming: A Functional Imaging Perspective , 1999, NeuroImage.

[78]  C. Bushell,et al.  Dissociated Identity and Semantic Priming in Broca's Aphasia: How Controlled Processing Produces Inhibitory Semantic Priming , 1996, Brain and Language.

[79]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Effects of Automatic Associative Activation on Explicit and Implicit Memory Tests , 1992 .

[80]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[81]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event related potentials and language comprehension. , 1995 .

[82]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Spreading activation versus compound cue accounts of priming: mediated priming revisited. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[83]  R. Heaton,et al.  Diagnostic utility of the Thurstone Word Fluency Test in neuropsychological evaluations. , 1982, Journal of clinical neuropsychology.

[84]  David A. Balota,et al.  Bringing Computational Models of Word Naming Down to the Item Level , 1997 .

[85]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Semantic Context Effects on Visual Word Processing: A Hybrid Prospective-Retrospective Processing Theory , 1989 .

[86]  R. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[87]  M. Masson,et al.  Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[88]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[89]  M. Masson,et al.  Masked Repetition Priming of Words and Nonwords: Evidence for a Nonlexical Basis for Priming , 1997 .