The Impact of Iron Core Model on Dynamic Behavior of Three-Phase Power Transformer Dynamic Model

This paper deals with the evaluation of various dynamic models for modeling of three-limb core power transformers. Due to the specific construction of such transformers, the magnetic fluxes in individual core limbs are interdependent. For applications, such as simulations and testing protection devices and algorithms, adequate prediction of inrush currents waveforms is crucial and indispensable. In this paper, various different dynamic models are tested where the limitations of standard models that are available in commercial program packages are pointed out. Two groups of models are evaluated separately: standard three-phase models composed of three-single phase transformer models and advanced three-phase models, where the topology of the magnetic circuit is considered. Furthermore, in both transformer model groups, three different material descriptions are evaluated, where linear, non-linear, and hysteretic material properties are considered. The comparison between measured and calculated waveforms of inrush currents is used to evaluate individual models. The comparison of evaluated models shows that standard dynamic models cannot provide proper waveforms of inrush currents regardless of which magnetically non-linear behavior of the iron core is considered. For adequate modeling of discussed transformers the consideration of the topology of the magnetic circuit is crucial.

[1]  Drago Dolinar,et al.  Usage of a Simplified and Jiles–Atherton Model When Accounting for the Hysteresis Losses Within a Welding Transformer , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[2]  M. A. S. Masoum,et al.  Three-Phase Asymmetric Transformer Aging Considering Voltage-Current Harmonic Interactions, Unbalanced Nonlinear Loading, Magnetic Couplings, and Hysteresis , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[3]  D. Jiles,et al.  Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis , 1986 .

[4]  Jos Arrillaga,et al.  Power Systems Electromagnetic Transients Simulation , 2002 .

[5]  G. Stumberger,et al.  Parameter Identification of the Jiles–Atherton Hysteresis Model Using Differential Evolution , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[6]  F. de Leon,et al.  Complete transformer model for electromagnetic transients , 1994 .

[7]  A. Knight,et al.  Parameter Optimization and Study of Inverse J-A Hysteresis Model , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[8]  J. Milias-Argitis,et al.  Three-Phase Transformer Model Including Magnetic Hysteresis and Eddy Currents Effects , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[9]  Hermann W. Dommel,et al.  Digital Computer Solution of Electromagnetic Transients in Single-and Multiphase Networks , 1969 .

[10]  Drago Dolinar,et al.  Comparison between the simplified and the Jiles‐Atherton model when accounting for the hysteresis losses of a transformer , 2013 .

[11]  Paul S Moses,et al.  Dynamic Modeling of Three-Phase Asymmetric Power Transformers With Magnetic Hysteresis: No-Load and Inrush Conditions , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[12]  D. Muthumuni,et al.  Simulation of hysteresis and eddy current effects in a power transformer , 2006 .

[13]  B.A. Mork,et al.  Transformer modeling for low- and mid-frequency transients - a review , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[14]  R. Iravani,et al.  An accurate hysteresis model for ferroresonance analysis of a transformer , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.