Thinking about Arabs and Muslims makes Americans shoot faster: Effects of category accessibility on aggressive responses in a shooter paradigm

Is the same person perceived as more dangerous if the perceiver is induced to think about Arab and Muslim categories versus no category? Using the shooter paradigm, this study investigated the effects of the accessibility of ethnic (Arab) versus religious (Muslim) categories versus no category on spontaneous aggressive responses toward a target with an ambiguous appearance. Results demonstrated that shooting reactions toward armed targets were faster than non-shooting reactions toward unarmed targets, especially if the target was a man. Despite these main effects, participants made faster decisions to shoot an ambiguous armed target if primed with the category Arab or Muslim (versus no category priming). The findings indicate that the mere priming of these social categories is sufficient to facilitate aggressive responses, even if the targets themselves are ambiguous. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  E. Plant,et al.  Selective Responses to Threat , 2011, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[2]  Joshua Correll,et al.  Target prototypicality moderates racial bias in the decision to shoot , 2011 .

[3]  M. K. Ahluwalia,et al.  Sikh men post-9/11: Misidentification, discrimination, and coping. , 2010 .

[4]  Jason R. Popan,et al.  Ingroup Identification and Group-Level Narcissism as Predictors of U.S. Citizens’ Attitudes and Behavior Toward Arab Immigrants , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[5]  Sally O. Hastings,et al.  Perceived Arab Ethnicity on Willingness to Help: An Application of the Lost-Letter Technique , 2010 .

[6]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Implicit (and explicit) racial attitudes barely changed during Barack Obama’s presidential campaign and early presidency , 2010, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

[7]  E. Higgins,et al.  The Ecology of Automaticity , 2010, Psychological science.

[8]  Sherman A. Lee,et al.  The Islamophobia Scale: Instrument Development and Initial Validation , 2009 .

[9]  Thomas F. Denson,et al.  The turban effect: The influence of Muslim headgear and induced affect on aggressive responses in the shooter bias paradigm , 2008 .

[10]  Joshua Correll,et al.  The influence of stereotypes on decisions to shoot , 2007 .

[11]  C. Judd,et al.  Across the thin blue line: police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Jaihyun Park,et al.  Implicit Attitudes Toward Arab-Muslims and the Moderating Effects of Social Information , 2007 .

[13]  Joseph Cesario,et al.  Automatic social behavior as motivated preparation to interact. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Debra L. Oswald,et al.  Understanding Anti‐Arab Reactions Post‐9/11: The Role of Threats, Social Categories, and Personal Ideologies1 , 2005 .

[15]  Paul G. Davies,et al.  Seeing black: race, crime, and visual processing. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  J. Archer Sex Differences in Aggression in Real-World Settings: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2004 .

[17]  Brad J. Bushman,et al.  You've got mail: Using e-mail to examine the effect of prejudiced attitudes on discrimination against Arabs , 2004 .

[18]  Adrian C. North,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: Representations of Islam and Muslims in Psychological Publications , 2004 .

[19]  A. Dijksterhuis,et al.  Effect of Social Category Priming on Personal Attitudes , 2003, Psychological science.

[20]  Jack G. Shaheen Reel Bad Arabs: How Hollywood Vilifies a People , 2003 .

[21]  C. Judd,et al.  The police officer's dilemma: using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  L Cosmides,et al.  Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  R. Petty,et al.  The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: a review of possible mechanisms. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Prejudice and perception: the role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  J. Bargh,et al.  Nonconscious Behavioral Confirmation Processes: The Self-Fulfilling Consequences of Automatic Stereotype Activation , 1997 .

[26]  T. E. Ford,et al.  Effects of stereotypical television portrayals of African-Americans on person perception , 1997 .

[27]  Tanya L. Chartrand,et al.  Automatic Activation of Impression Formation and Memorization Goals: Nonconscious Goal Priming Reproduces Effects of Explicit Task Instructions , 1996 .

[28]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  A. Elliot,et al.  Are Racial Stereotypes Really Fading? The Princeton Trilogy Revisited , 1995 .

[30]  B. Malle,et al.  Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. , 1994 .

[31]  Joshua Correll,et al.  Dangerous Enough: Moderating Racial Bias with Contextual Threat Cues. , 2011, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[32]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  P. Devine Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[34]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  Category accessibility and impression formation , 1977 .