A STANDARDIZED GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION MEASURE

Abstract Interpretation of genetic differentiation values is often problematic because of their dependence on the level of genetic variation. For example, the maximum level of GST is less than the average within population homozygosity so that for highly variable loci, even when no alleles are shared between subpopulations, GST may be low. To remedy this difficulty, a standardized measure of genetic differentiation is introduced here, one which has the same range, 0–1, for all levels of genetic variation. With this measure, the magnitude is the proportion of the maximum differentiation possible for the level of subpopulation homozygosity observed. This is particularly important for situations in which the mutation rate is of the same magnitude or higher than the rate of gene flow. The standardized measure allows comparison between loci with different levels of genetic variation, such as allozymes and microsatellite loci, or mtDNA and Y-chromosome genes, and for genetic differentiation for organisms with different effective population sizes.

[1]  Christian Brochmann,et al.  Refugia, differentiation and postglacial migration in arctic‐alpine Eurasia, exemplified by the mountain avens (Dryas octopetala L.) , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[2]  Henrik Mosegaard,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL CORRELATES OF POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION IN ATLANTIC HERRING , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  M. Hammer,et al.  Global patterns of human mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosome structure are not influenced by higher migration rates of females versus males , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Laurent Excoffier,et al.  Analysis of Population Subdivision , 2004 .

[5]  H. Hattemer,et al.  Genetic distance between populations , 1982, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[6]  R. Chakraborty,et al.  Heterozygote deficiency, population substructure and their implications in DNA fingerprinting , 2004, Human Genetics.

[7]  Nicholas H. Barton,et al.  The Effects of Genetic and Geographic Structure on Neutral Variation , 2003 .

[8]  J. Long,et al.  Human Genetic Diversity and the Nonexistence of Biological Races , 2003, Human biology.

[9]  F. Balloux,et al.  The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[10]  P. Hedrick.  PERSPECTIVE: HIGHLY VARIABLE LOCI AND THEIR INTERPRETATION IN EVOLUTION AND CONSERVATION , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  Eric Minch,et al.  Genetic evidence for a higher female migration rate in humans , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[12]  B. Charlesworth.  Measures of divergence between populations and the effect of forces that reduce variability. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[13]  T. Nagylaki,et al.  Fixation indices in subdivided populations. , 1998, Genetics.

[14]  Li Jin,et al.  Population structure, stepwise mutations, heterozygote deficiency and their implications in DNA forensics , 1995, Heredity.

[15]  M. Nei.  Molecular Evolutionary Genetics , 1987 .

[16]  Sewall Wright,et al.  Variability within and among natural populations , 1978 .

[17]  M. Nei.  Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  S. Wright.  THE INTERPRETATION OF POPULATION STRUCTURE BY F‐STATISTICS WITH SPECIAL REGARD TO SYSTEMS OF MATING , 1965 .

[19]  R. Lewontin.  The Interaction of Selection and Linkage. I. General Considerations; Heterotic Models. , 1964, Genetics.

[20]  S WRIGHT,et al.  Genetical Structure of Populations , 1950, British medical journal.

[21]  S WRIGHT,et al.  Genetical structure of populations. , 1950, Nature.

[22]  S. Wright,et al.  Isolation by Distance. , 1943, Genetics.